World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
39
Citations
5789
World Ranking
6392
National Ranking
658

Richard J. Payne publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard J. Payne sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 150 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Richard J. Payne D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard J. Payne sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard J. Payne was affiliated with the University of York in the United Kingdom. Their research was primarily situated within Environmental Science, with significant contributions also in Earth and Planetary Sciences. Specific subfields of study included Ecology, Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Plant Science, and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics.

The main topics explored in their research comprised Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology, Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics, Geology and Paleoclimatology Research, Fire effects on ecosystems, Climate change and permafrost, Protist diversity and phylogeny, and Geological formations and processes.

Frequent publication venues for Richard J. Payne included:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Nature Climate Change
  • Quaternary Science Reviews
  • Journal of Ecology
  • Nature Communications

Key recent papers authored or co-authored by Payne were:

  • Expert assessment of future vulnerability of the global peatland carbon sink, 2020, Nature Climate Change
  • Environmental drivers of Sphagnum growth in peatlands across the Holarctic region, 2020, Journal of Ecology
  • Recent climate change has driven divergent hydrological shifts in high-latitude peatlands, 2022, Nature Communications
  • Developing a continental-scale testate amoeba hydrological transfer function for Asian peatlands, 2021, Quaternary Science Reviews
  • Key periods of peatland development and environmental changes in the middle taiga zone of Western Siberia during the Holocene, 2021, AMBIO

Richard J. Payne collaborated frequently with a number of researchers, including:

  • Yuri Mazei
  • Andrey N. Tsyganov
  • Mariusz Lamentowicz
  • Graeme T. Swindles
  • Kirill V. Babeshko

Best Publications

  • Expert assessment of future vulnerability of the global peatland carbon sink

    J. Loisel;A. V. Gallego-Sala;Matthew J. Amesbury;Matthew J. Amesbury;G. Magnan

  • Looking forward through the past: Identification of 50 priority research questions in palaeoecology

    Alistair W. R. Seddon;Alistair W. R. Seddon;Anson W. Mackay;Ambroise G. Baker;H. John B. Birks;H. John B. Birks;H. John B. Birks

  • Widespread drying of European peatlands in recent centuries

    Graeme T. Swindles;Graeme T. Swindles;Graeme T. Swindles;Paul J. Morris;Donal J. Mullan;Richard J. Payne

  • How many is enough? Determining optimal count totals for ecological and palaeoecological studies of testate amoebae

    Richard J. Payne;Edward A. D. Mitchell

  • Nitrogen deposition and plant biodiversity: past, present, and future

    Richard John Payne;Nancy B. Dise;Christopher D Field;Anthony Dore

  • Soil protistology rebooted: 30 fundamental questions to start with

    Stefan Geisen;Edward A. D. Mitchell;David M. Wilkinson;Sina Adl

  • Impact of nitrogen deposition at the species level

    Richard J. Payne;Nancy B. Dise;Carly J. Stevens;David J. Gowing

  • Development of a new pan-European testate amoeba transfer function for reconstructing peatland palaeohydrology

    Matthew J. Amesbury;Graeme T. Swindles;Anatoly Bobrov;Dan J. Charman

  • An unexpected role for mixotrophs in the response of peatland carbon cycling to climate warming

    Vincent E. J. Jassey;Vincent E. J. Jassey;Constant Signarbieux;Constant Signarbieux;Stephan Hättenschwiler;Luca Bragazza;Luca Bragazza

  • Potential implications of differential preservation of testate amoeba shells for paleoenvironmental reconstruction in peatlands

    Edward A. D. Mitchell;Richard J. Payne;Mariusz Lamentowicz

  • The Role of Nitrogen Deposition in Widespread Plant Community Change Across Semi-natural Habitats

    Chris D. Field;Nancy B. Dise;Richard J. Payne;Richard J. Payne;Andrea J. Britton

  • Widespread global peatland establishment and persistence over the last 130,000 y

    Claire C. Treat;Claire C. Treat;Thomas Kleinen;Nils Broothaerts;April S. Dalton

  • Ecology of testate amoebae (protista) in south-central Alaska peatlands: Building transfer-function models for palaeoenvironmental studies

    Richard Payne;Keiko Kishaba;Jeffrey J Blackford;Edward A D Mitchell

  • Taxonomic and functional turnover are decoupled in European peat bogs

    Bjorn J. M. Robroek;Bjorn J. M. Robroek;Vincent E. J. Jassey;Richard J. Payne;Richard J. Payne;Magalí Martí

  • Seven Reasons Why Protists Make Useful Bioindicators

    Richard J. Payne

  • Ecology of Testate Amoebae from Mires in the Central Rhodope Mountains, Greece and Development of a Transfer Function for Palaeohydrological Reconstruction

    Richard J. Payne;Edward A.D. Mitchell

  • The Holocene paleoenvironmental history of central European Russia reconstructed from pollen, plant macrofossil, and testate amoeba analyses of the Klukva peatland, Tula region

    Elena Yu. Novenko;Elena Yu. Novenko;Andrey N. Tsyganov;Elena M. Volkova;Kirill V. Babeshko

  • Can testate amoeba‐based palaeohydrology be extended to fens?

    Richard J. Payne

  • Environmental drivers of Sphagnum growth in peatlands across the Holarctic region

    Fia Bengtsson;Håkan Rydin;Jennifer L. Baltzer;Luca Bragazza;Luca Bragazza

  • Ecology of testate amoebae in peatlands of central China and development of a transfer function for paleohydrological reconstruction

    Yangmin Qin;Edward A. D. Mitchell;Mariusz Lamentowicz;Richard J. Payne

  • Testate amoebae in pollen slides

    Richard J. Payne;Richard J. Payne;Mariusz Lamentowicz;W.O. van der Knaap;Jacqueline F.N. van Leeuwen

Frequent Co-Authors

Edward A. D. Mitchell
Edward A. D. Mitchell University of Neuchâtel
Mariusz Lamentowicz
Mariusz Lamentowicz Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań
Carly J. Stevens
Carly J. Stevens Lancaster University
Nancy B. Dise
Nancy B. Dise Manchester Metropolitan University
Graeme T. Swindles
Graeme T. Swindles Queen's University Belfast
Vincent E. J. Jassey
Vincent E. J. Jassey Federal University of Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées
Elena Novenko
Elena Novenko Lomonosov Moscow State University
Dan J. Charman
Dan J. Charman University of Exeter
Luca Bragazza
Luca Bragazza Agroscope
Dmitri Mauquoy
Dmitri Mauquoy University of Aberdeen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a career in Ecology and Evolution, there are several related online degrees and learning pathways worth exploring. Many non profit colleges offer flexible, accredited programs in the life sciences and related fields, ensuring you receive quality education with strong institutional support.

Online learning can be especially beneficial for active military members, veterans, and their families. The best online colleges for military often provide tailored resources and support networks, making it easier to balance studies with service commitments or transitions to civilian careers.

Those interested in expanding their expertise in areas of human impact on the environment might consider programs outside the traditional biology path. For example, the online MSW programs combine social work with environmental advocacy, while the fast track masters in psychology can provide insights into human behavior’s effects on ecological systems.

By exploring these related degrees, you can broaden your career options across research, advocacy, consulting, education, and policy, making a meaningful impact in both science and society.

Best Scientists Citing Richard J. Payne

Recently Published Articles