World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 60 1460 1303 272 246 183 14371

Celia Kitzinger publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Celia Kitzinger between 1985 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Celia Kitzinger published across 40 years, from 1985 to 2024, averaging 4.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2007. 2 of the 189 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2007. 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 9 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 16 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 1 publication
1985 2024

189 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Celia Kitzinger: publications per year, 1985 to 2024
Year Publications
1985 1
1986 1
1987 0
1988 0
1989 3
1990 0
1991 3
1992 6
1993 8
1994 9
1995 6
1996 7
1997 3
1998 7
1999 6
2000 5
2001 4
2002 7
2003 3
2004 6
2005 9
2006 5
2007 16
2008 6
2009 2
2010 4
2011 3
2012 5
2013 7
2014 7
2015 11
2016 5
2017 4
2018 7
2019 5
2020 3
2021 3
2022 0
2023 1
2024 1
Total 189
Download as CSV

Celia Kitzinger publications per year - data summary

  • Celia Kitzinger, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from University of York, has 189 publications recorded across 40 years, from 1985 to 2024.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1985 and the most recent to 2024.
  • The most productive year is 2007, with 16 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1985, 1986, 2023 and 2024, with 1 publication each.
  • 4 of the 40 years in the span carry no publications at all (1987, 1988, 1990 and 2022).
  • The rate of publication averages 4.7 papers per year over the whole span, or 5.3 per year counting only the 36 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2020-2024) hold 8 publications, 4% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1985-1998: 54 publications (3.9 per year); 1999-2012: 81 publications (5.8 per year); 2013-2024: 54 publications (4.5 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is broadly steady.

Celia Kitzinger publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Celia Kitzinger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 174–183 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 183 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313 183
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Celia Kitzinger publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 54 ranges running from 44–53 to 570+ publications.
  • Celia Kitzinger, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from University of York, records 183 publications - the 57th percentile of the discipline.
  • 57% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Celia Kitzinger, and about 43% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 164–173 publications range, and Celia Kitzinger ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 114–123 publications, holding 474 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 174–183 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 570 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Celia Kitzinger D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Celia Kitzinger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106 60
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Celia Kitzinger D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 71 ranges running from 30 to 100+ D-Index.
  • Celia Kitzinger, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from University of York, records 60 D-Index - the 82nd percentile of the discipline.
  • 82% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Celia Kitzinger, and about 18% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 45 D-Index range, and Celia Kitzinger ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 42 D-Index, holding 313 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more, 97 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

Celia Kitzinger is affiliated with the University of York in the United Kingdom, and their academic work spans multiple fields primarily within medicine and social sciences. The main areas of their research include medicine with a focus on public health, environmental and occupational health, as well as sociology, political science, pediatrics, perinatology, child health, and clinical psychology.

Their research topics cover significant aspects of healthcare and ethics, including:

  • Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies
  • Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
  • Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Ethics in Medical Practice

Celia Kitzinger has collaborated frequently with several co-authors throughout their career. Notable frequent collaborators include:

  • Jenny Kitzinger
  • Jocelyn Downie
  • Ben White
  • Lindy Willmott
  • Penney Lewis

Their publication record indicates an interdisciplinary approach, combining medical research with social science perspectives to explore complex ethical and legal issues related to healthcare. This includes work on multicultural legal studies and pediatric healthcare ethics, reflecting a blend of clinical and societal concerns in their scholarship.

The diversity in fields such as pediatrics, clinical psychology, and general health professions demonstrates the breadth of Kitzinger's scope within health-related disciplines, emphasizing both practical and theoretical topics in their research.

Best Publications

  • Anonymising interview data: challenges and compromise in practice

    Benjamin Saunders;Jenny Kitzinger;Celia Kitzinger

  • Heteronormativity in Action: Reproducing the Heterosexual Nuclear Family in After-hours Medical Calls

    Celia Kitzinger

  • Just Say No? The Use of Conversation Analysis in Developing a Feminist Perspective on Sexual Refusal:

    Celia Kitzinger;Hannah Frith

  • Representing the Other: A Feminism & Psychology Reader

    Sue Wilkinson;Celia Kitzinger

  • Doing Feminist Conversation Analysis

    Celia Kitzinger

  • 'The thief of womanhood': women's experience of polycystic ovarian syndrome.

    Celia Kitzinger;Jo Willmott

  • Surprise As an Interactional Achievement: Reaction Tokens in Conversation:

    Sue Wilkinson;Celia Kitzinger

  • Transitions from Heterosexuality to Lesbianism: The Discursive Production of Lesbian Identities.

    Celia Kitzinger;Sue Wilkinson

  • Changing Our Minds: Lesbian Feminism and Psychology

    Celia Kitzinger;Rachel Perkins

  • "Speaking as a heterosexual" : (How) does sexuality matter for talk-in-interaction?

    Celia Kitzinger

  • An open letter to The BMJ editors on qualitative research

    Trisha Greenhalgh;Ellen Annandale;Richard Ashcroft;James Barlow

  • Reformulating Sexual Script Theory: Developing a Discursive Psychology of Sexual Negotiation

    Hannah Frith;Celia Kitzinger

  • Thinking differently about thinking positive: a discursive approach to cancer patients’ talk

    Sue Wilkinson;Celia Kitzinger

  • Heterosexuality : a feminism & psychology reader

    Sue Wilkinson;Celia Kitzinger

  • Theorizing representing the other

    Celia Kitzinger;Sue Wilkinson

  • 'Kids are just cruel anyway': lesbian and gay parents' talk about homophobic bullying.

    Victoria Clarke;Celia Kitzinger;Jonathan Potter

  • "Emotion work" as a participant resource: a feminist analysis of young women's talk-in-interaction

    Hannah Frith;Celia Kitzinger

  • Speaking as a Lesbian: Correcting the Heterosexist Presumption

    Victoria Land;Celia Kitzinger

  • Attitudes towards lesbians and gay men and support for lesbian and gay human rights among psychology students.

    Sonja J Ellis;Celia Kitzinger;Sue Wilkinson

  • Feminism and Discourse Psychological Perspectives

    Sue Wilkinson;Celia Kitzinger

  • 'The thief of womanhood': women'sexperience of polycys tic ovarian syndrome

    Celia Kitzinger;Jo Willmott

Frequent Co-Authors

Jenny Kitzinger
Jenny Kitzinger Cardiff University
Sue Wilkinson
Sue Wilkinson Loughborough University
Derick T Wade
Derick T Wade Oxford Brookes University
Victoria Clarke
Victoria Clarke University of the West of England
Virginia Braun
Virginia Braun University of Auckland
Sarah Nettleton
Sarah Nettleton University of York
David J. Hunter
David J. Hunter Harvard University
Janice M. Morse
Janice M. Morse University of Utah
Trisha Greenhalgh
Trisha Greenhalgh University of Oxford
Sharon E. Straus
Sharon E. Straus University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students interested in Social Sciences and Humanities have a wealth of online degree opportunities that can fast-track their professional journey. For those committed to social work, accelerated msw programs make it possible to earn a master’s degree in less time, opening doors to advanced roles in community service and clinical work.

If you’re fascinated by human behavior and mental processes, the fastest online psychology degree options offer flexibility—for both new students and working professionals—while providing a strong foundation in psychological research and applications.

Aspiring counselors can benefit from the best online cacrep counseling programs, which meet rigorous accreditation standards, supporting direct entry into licensure pathways. Similarly, those focusing on family and relationship dynamics may pursue one of the top online marriage and family therapy masters programs, preparing for rewarding careers in therapeutic settings.

Whether you want to serve communities, counsel individuals, or support families, these online pathways provide flexibility, affordability, and respected credentials for a variety of impactful careers.

Best Scientists Citing Celia Kitzinger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles