World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
54
Citations
14337
World Ranking
4531
National Ranking
2518

Lisa M. Diamond publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa M. Diamond sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 128 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Lisa M. Diamond D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa M. Diamond sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lisa M. Diamond is affiliated with the University of Utah in the United States, contributing extensively to research at the intersection of psychology and medicine. Their body of work includes 24 publications in psychology and 14 in medicine, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach.

The scientist's research spans several subfields, including social psychology, general health professions, gender studies, experimental and cognitive psychology, and clinical psychology. These focus areas establish a broad foundation for addressing complex issues related to human behavior, health, and identity.

Main topics investigated by Lisa M. Diamond include LGBTQ health, identity, and policy; adolescent sexual and reproductive health; gender roles and identity studies; evolutionary psychology and human behavior; sexual function and dysfunction studies; child abuse and trauma; and attachment and relationship dynamics. These topics illustrate the emphasis on understanding diversity in sexuality and gender, as well as health-related outcomes within these populations.

The scientist's frequent publication venues mirror this focus, with multiple contributions to the Archives of Sexual Behavior and The SAGE Encyclopedia of LGBTQ Studies. Other notable venues include Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, Child Development Perspectives, and the International Journal of Sexual Health.

Key co-authors collaborating with Lisa M. Diamond include Jenna Alley, Virginia Jenkins, Bethany G. Everett, Amy S. McDonnell, and Janna A. Dickenson, indicating sustained collaborative efforts within their research fields.

Representative recent publications encompass:

  • "Rethinking minority stress: A social safety perspective on the health effects of stigma in sexually-diverse and gender-diverse populations" (2022), Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • "Gender Fluidity and Nonbinary Gender Identities Among Children and Adolescents" (2020), Child Development Perspectives
  • "The Health Benefits of Sexual Expression" (2021), International Journal of Sexual Health
  • "Systemic inflammation as a driver of health disparities among sexually-diverse and gender-diverse individuals" (2021), Psychoneuroendocrinology
  • "The New Genetic Evidence on Same-Gender Sexuality: Implications for Sexual Fluidity and Multiple Forms of Sexual Diversity" (2021), The Journal of Sex Research

Best Publications

  • What does sexual orientation orient? A biobehavioral model distinguishing romantic love and sexual desire.

    Lisa M. Diamond

  • Female bisexuality from adolescence to adulthood: results from a 10-year longitudinal study.

    Lisa M. Diamond

  • Sexual Identity Trajectories Among Sexual-Minority Youths: Gender Comparisons

    Ritch C. Savin-Williams;Lisa M. Diamond

  • Sexual Fluidity: Understanding Women's Love and Desire

    Lisa M. Diamond

  • Emotion Regulation Across the Life Span: An Integrative Perspective Emphasizing Self-Regulation, Positive Affect, and Dyadic Processes

    Lisa M. Diamond;Lisa G. Aspinwall

  • Sexual Orientation, Controversy, and Science:

    J. Michael Bailey;Paul L. Vasey;Lisa M. Diamond;S. Marc Breedlove

  • Sexual identity, attractions, and behavior among young sexual-minority women over a 2-year period.

    Lisa M. Diamond

  • Was it a phase? Young women's relinquishment of lesbian/bisexual identities over a 5-year period.

    Lisa M. Diamond

  • Questioning Gender and Sexual Identity: Dynamic Links Over Time

    Lisa M. Diamond;Molly Butterworth

  • Emerging Perspectives on Distinctions Between Romantic Love and Sexual Desire

    Lisa M. Diamond

  • Development of sexual orientation among adolescent and young adult women.

    Lisa M. Diamond

  • Rethinking minority stress: A social safety perspective on the health effects of stigma in sexually-diverse and gender-diverse populations

    Unknown

  • The Place of Attachment in Human Mating

    Cindy Hazan;Lisa M. Diamond

  • Every time you go away: changes in affect, behavior, and physiology associated with travel-related separations from romantic partners.

    Lisa M. Diamond;Angela M. Hicks;Kimberly D. Otter-Henderson

  • A NEW VIEW OF LESBIAN SUBTYPES: STABLE VERSUS FLUID IDENTITY TRAJECTORIES OVER AN 8‐YEAR PERIOD

    Lisa M. Diamond

  • ‘I’m Straight, but I Kissed a Girl’: The Trouble with American Media Representations of Female-Female Sexuality:

    Lisa M. Diamond

  • Desegregating Sexuality Research: Cultural and Biological Perspectives on Gender and Desire

    Deborah L. Tolman;Lisa M. Diamond

  • Explaining Diversityin the Development of Same-Sex Sexuality Among Young Women

    Lisa M. Diamond;Ritch C. Savin-Williams

  • Is Good Sex Good for You? Rethinking Sexuality and Health

    Lisa M. Diamond;David M. Huebner

  • Physiological evidence for repressive coping among avoidantly attached adults

    Lisa M. Diamond;Angela M. Hicks;Kimberly Otter-Henderson

  • Contributions of Psychophysiology to Research on Adult Attachment: Review and Recommendations:

    Lisa M. Diamond

  • Emotion Regulation Across the Life Span: An Integrative Perspective Emphasizing Self-Regulation, Positive Affect,

    Lisa M. Diamond;Lisa G. Aspinwall

Frequent Co-Authors

Ritch C. Savin-Williams
Ritch C. Savin-Williams Cornell University
Deborah L. Tolman
Deborah L. Tolman City University of New York
Paul L. Vasey
Paul L. Vasey University of Lethbridge
Eric Vilain
Eric Vilain George Washington University
S. Marc Breedlove
S. Marc Breedlove Michigan State University
Lisa G. Aspinwall
Lisa G. Aspinwall University of Utah
Sari M. van Anders
Sari M. van Anders Queen's University
J. Michael Bailey
J. Michael Bailey Northwestern University
David M. Huebner
David M. Huebner George Washington University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens up a range of related online programs in fields like counseling, mental health, and social work. Many students look for flexible options that allow them to study remotely, while still gaining practical skills relevant to their career goals.

There is growing interest in areas such as clinical counseling, school psychology, and substance abuse therapy. For example, students seeking practical experience and local accreditation often review the popular counseling programs in Florida. Similarly, if ranking and program quality matter, the best-ranked counseling degree programs in Georgia offer a strong foundation.

Massachusetts is known for universities with a clinical focus. The popular counseling degrees in Massachusetts highlight programs with innovative approaches to research and therapy. In the Midwest, the top-ranked counseling degree programs in Michigan are valued for professional development and licensure pathways.

No matter where you choose to study, online degrees can provide flexibility and access to diverse career pathways, supporting ambitions in fields like counseling, therapy, and behavioral health.

Best Scientists Citing Lisa M. Diamond

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles