World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Helena J. Teede

Helena J. Teede

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 100 8211 7720 240 235 577 41878

Helena J. Teede publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Helena J. Teede between 1993 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Helena J. Teede published across 34 years, from 1993 to 2026, averaging 25.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 94 publications in 2024. 62 of the 864 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 94. Peak 94 publications in 2024. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 27 publications 2012: 21 publications 2013: 27 publications 2014: 28 publications 2015: 39 publications 2016: 40 publications 2017: 54 publications 2018: 64 publications 2019: 55 publications 2020: 68 publications 2021: 55 publications 2022: 58 publications 2023: 69 publications 2024: 94 publications 2025: 59 publications 2026: 3 publications
1993 2026

864 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Helena J. Teede: publications per year, 1993 to 2026
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 2
1998 7
1999 2
2000 8
2001 7
2002 3
2003 6
2004 7
2005 6
2006 4
2007 10
2008 7
2009 15
2010 18
2011 27
2012 21
2013 27
2014 28
2015 39
2016 40
2017 54
2018 64
2019 55
2020 68
2021 55
2022 58
2023 69
2024 94
2025 59
2026 3
Total 864
Download as CSV

Helena J. Teede publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Helena J. Teede sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 561–580 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 577 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504 577
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Helena J. Teede D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Helena J. Teede sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 100–101 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 100 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611 100
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2017 - Fellow of the Australian Academy of Health and Medical Science

Overview

Helena J. Teede is affiliated with Monash University in Australia and has an extensive publication record primarily within the field of Medicine. Their research spans several subfields including Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism.

Their main research topics cover ovarian function and disorders, gestational diabetes research and management, reproductive biology and fertility, pregnancy and preeclampsia studies, bariatric surgery and outcomes, ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment, and birth, development, and health.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Helena J. Teede include:

  • Joanne Enticott
  • Aya Mousa
  • Lisa Moran
  • Jacqueline Boyle
  • Chau Thien Tay

The scientist has published extensively in several prominent venues, with notable publication counts in:

  • BMJ Open (16 publications)
  • Human Reproduction (13 publications)
  • Clinical Endocrinology (12 publications)
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (11 publications)
  • EClinicalMedicine (11 publications)

Selected recent papers include:

  • "Recommendations From the 2023 International Evidence-based Guideline for the Assessment and Management of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome," 2023, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
  • "Recommendations from the 2023 international evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome," 2023, European Journal of Endocrinology
  • "Polycystic ovary syndrome," 2022, The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology
  • "Impact of age at type 2 diabetes mellitus diagnosis on mortality and vascular complications: systematic review and meta-analyses," 2020, Diabetologia
  • "Treatment of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Diagnosed Early in Pregnancy," 2023, New England Journal of Medicine

Helena J. Teede was awarded the Fellowship of the Australian Academy of Health and Medical Science in 2017.

Best Publications

  • Recommendations from the international evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome

    Helena J. Teede;Helena J. Teede;Marie L. Misso;Marie L. Misso;Michael F. Costello;Anuja Dokras

  • Polycystic ovary syndrome: a complex condition with psychological, reproductive and metabolic manifestations that impacts on health across the lifespan

    Helena Teede;Amanda Deeks;Lisa Moran

  • Association of Gestational Weight Gain With Maternal and Infant Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    R.F. Goldstein;S.K. Abell;S. Ranasinha;M. Misso

  • Polycystic ovary syndrome.

    Ricardo Azziz;Enrico Carmina;Zijiang Chen;Andrea Dunaif

  • Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy: An Endocrine Society Scientific Statement

    Richard J. Santen;D. Craig Allred;Stacy P. Ardoin;David F. Archer

  • Lifestyle changes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome

    Lisa J Moran;Samantha K Hutchison;Robert J Norman;Helena J Teede

  • Women with polycystic ovary syndrome have intrinsic insulin resistance on euglycaemic–hyperinsulaemic clamp

    Nigel Keith Stepto;Samantha Cassar;Anju Elizabeth Joham;Samantha Kate Hutchison

  • The management of anovulatory infertility in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: an analysis of the evidence to support the development of global WHO guidance

    Adam H. Balen;Lara C. Morley;Marie Misso;Stephen Franks

  • Treatment of obesity in polycystic ovary syndrome: a position statement of the Androgen Excess and Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Society.

    Lisa Jane Moran;Renato Pasquali;Helena Jane Teede;Kathleen M Hoeger

  • Effect of diet and physical activity based interventions in pregnancy on gestational weight gain and pregnancy outcomes: meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised trials

    Ewelina Rogozinska;Nadine Marlin;Ana Pilar Betran;Arne Astrup

  • Assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome: summary of an evidence-based guideline

    Helena J Teede;Marie L Misso;Amanda A Deeks;Lisa J Moran

  • Metabolic features of the reproductive phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome

    Lisa Jane Moran;Helena Jane Teede

  • Gestational weight gain across continents and ethnicity: systematic review and meta-analysis of maternal and infant outcomes in more than one million women

    Rebecca F. Goldstein;Sally K. Abell;Sanjeeva Ranasinha;Marie L. Misso

  • Dietary soy has both beneficial and potentially adverse cardiovascular effects: a placebo-controlled study in men and postmenopausal women.

    Helena J. Teede;Fabien S. Dalais;Dimitra Kotsopoulos;Yu-Lu Liang

  • Delayed Diagnosis and a Lack of Information Associated With Dissatisfaction in Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.

    Melanie Gibson-Helm;Helena Teede;Andrea Dunaif;Anuja Dokras

  • Longitudinal weight gain in women identified with polycystic ovary syndrome: results of an observational study in young women

    Helena Jane Teede;Anju Elizabeth Joham;Eldho Paul;Lisa Jane Moran

  • Overweight Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Have Evidence of Subclinical Cardiovascular Disease

    Caroline Meyer;Barry Patrick McGrath;Helena Jane Teede

  • Non-invasive measurements of arterial structure and function: repeatability, interrelationships and trial sample size.

    Yu-Lu Liang;Helena J Teede;Dimitra Kotsopoulos;Louise M Shiel

  • Exercise therapy in polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review

    Cheryce L Harrison;Catherine B Lombard;Lisa J Moran;Helena J Teede

  • Metformin and lifestyle modification in polycystic ovary syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Negar Naderpoor;Soulmaz Shorakae;Barbora de Courten;Marie Louise Misso

Frequent Co-Authors

Sophia Zoungas
Sophia Zoungas Monash University
Robert J. Norman
Robert J. Norman University of Adelaide
Helen Skouteris
Helen Skouteris Monash University
Wendy J. Brown
Wendy J. Brown University of Queensland
Gavin W. Lambert
Gavin W. Lambert Swinburne University of Technology
Ben Willem J. Mol
Ben Willem J. Mol Monash University
Flavia M. Cicuttini
Flavia M. Cicuttini Monash University
Henry G. Burger
Henry G. Burger Hudson Institute of Medical Research
James D. Cameron
James D. Cameron Monash University
Gita D. Mishra
Gita D. Mishra University of Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in healthcare can open new doors for those interested in advancing their medical careers, even if you are not pursuing a traditional MD route. One important consideration is choosing the right program accreditation. If you’re looking into healthcare administration, it’s crucial to know which online healthcare administration programs have CAHME accreditation? Accreditation ensures that your degree is recognized and meets high industry standards.

For registered nurses seeking to boost their qualifications, options like an RN to BSN online without clinicals provide flexibility—ideal for working professionals. Completing your BSN can be a stepping stone toward leadership roles or further education.

Those aiming for advanced practice roles may consider pursuing a Doctor of Nursing Practice. Comprehensive guides are available to help you choose the fastest DNP program or the easiest DNP programs online. These programs are designed for efficiency and may be ideal for healthcare professionals with demanding schedules.

Whether your interests lie in healthcare administration, nursing leadership, or clinical care, these online degree options offer accessible, accredited, and flexible pathways to advance your medical career in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Helena J. Teede

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles