World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
98
Citations
44527
World Ranking
8806
National Ranking
347

Joop S.E. Laven publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joop S.E. Laven sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 430 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Joop S.E. Laven D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joop S.E. Laven sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 98 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Joop S.E. Laven is affiliated with Erasmus University Rotterdam in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on medical sciences, with a significant concentration in reproductive medicine. They have contributed extensively to the study of ovarian function and disorders, reproductive biology and fertility, and related fields.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Medicine

Within this domain, their subfields of specialization cover:

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Molecular Biology

Joop S.E. Laven's research topics include:

  • Ovarian function and disorders
  • Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
  • Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
  • Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
  • Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Reproductive System and Pregnancy

Their recent scientific papers demonstrate a focus on polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), fertility preservation, and cancer survivorship related fertility issues. Notable publications include:

  • "Long-term cardiometabolic disease risk in women with PCOS: a systematic review and meta-analysis" (2020), published in Human Reproduction Update
  • "Recommendations from the 2023 International Evidence-based Guideline for the Assessment and Management of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome" (2023), published in Fertility and Sterility
  • "Polycystic ovary syndrome" (2024), published in Nature Reviews Disease Primers
  • "Fertility preservation for male patients with childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer: recommendations from the PanCareLIFE Consortium and the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group" (2021), published in The Lancet Oncology
  • "Fertility preservation for female patients with childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer: recommendations from the PanCareLIFE Consortium and the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group" (2021), published in The Lancet Oncology

The investigator has frequently collaborated with a core group of coauthors, including:

  • Yvonne V. Louwers
  • Régine P.M. Steegers-Theunissen
  • Geranne Jiskoot
  • Kim van der Ham
  • Sam Schoenmakers

Publication venues in which they have been regularly featured highlight the focus and influence of their work. These venues include:

  • Human Reproduction
  • Fertility and Sterility
  • Reproductive BioMedicine Online
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
  • Journal of the Endocrine Society

Best Publications

  • Consensus on women's health aspects of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): The Amsterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored 3rd PCOS Consensus Workshop Group

    Bart C.J.M. Fauser;Basil C. Tarlatzis;Robert W. Rebar;Richard S. Legro

  • Recommendations from the international evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome

    Helena J. Teede;Helena J. Teede;Marie L. Misso;Marie L. Misso;Michael F. Costello;Anuja Dokras

  • Anti‐Müllerian hormone expression pattern in the human ovary: potential implications for initial and cyclic follicle recruitment

    Christien Weenen;Joop S.E. Laven;Anne R.M. von Bergh;Mark Cranfield

  • Polycystic ovary syndrome.

    Ricardo Azziz;Enrico Carmina;Zijiang Chen;Andrea Dunaif

  • Ultrasound assessment of the polycystic ovary: international consensus definitions.

    Adam H Balen;Joop S. E. Laven;Seang Lin Tan;Didier Dewailly

  • Antimüllerian hormone serum levels: a putative marker for ovarian aging.

    Annemarie de Vet;Joop S.E. Laven;Frank H. de Jong;Axel P.N. Themmen

  • Anti-Müllerian hormone: a new marker for ovarian function

    Jenny A Visser;Frank H de Jong;Joop S E Laven;Axel P N Themmen

  • Scientific statement on the diagnostic criteria, epidemiology, pathophysiology, and molecular genetics of polycystic ovary syndrome

    Daniel A. Dumesic;Sharon E. Oberfield;Elisabet Stener-Victorin;John C. Marshall

  • Anti-Müllerian Hormone Serum Concentrations in Normoovulatory and Anovulatory Women of Reproductive Age

    Joop S. E. Laven;Annemarie G. M. G. J. Mulders;Jenny A. Visser;Axel P. Themmen

  • Association of Age at Onset of Menopause and Time Since Onset of Menopause With Cardiovascular Outcomes, Intermediate Vascular Traits, and All-Cause Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

    Taulant Muka;Clare Oliver-Williams;Setor K Kunutsor;Joop S E Laven

  • Anti-Müllerian hormone: ovarian reserve testing and its potential clinical implications.

    Simone L. Broer;Frank J.M. Broekmans;Joop S.E. Laven;Bart C.J.M. Fauser

  • Genomic analyses identify hundreds of variants associated with age at menarche and support a role for puberty timing in cancer risk

    Felix R. Day;Deborah J. Thompson;Hannes Helgason;Hannes Helgason;Daniel I. Chasman

  • Definition and significance of polycystic ovarian morphology: a task force report from the Androgen Excess and Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Society

    Didier Dewailly;Marla E Lujan;Enrico Carmina;Marcelle I Cedars

  • Thirty new loci for age at menarche identified by a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies

    Cathy E. Elks;John R B Perry;Patrick Sulem;Daniel I. Chasman

  • PCOS according to the Rotterdam consensus criteria: change in prevalence among WHO‐II anovulation and association with metabolic factors

    F. J. Broekmans;E. A. H. Knauff;O. Valkenburg;J. S. Laven

  • A meta-analysis of outcomes of conventional IVF in women with polycystic ovary syndrome

    E.M.E.W. Heijnen;M.J.C. Eijkemans;E.G. Hughes;J.S.E. Laven

  • Large-scale genome-wide meta-analysis of polycystic ovary syndrome suggests shared genetic architecture for different diagnosis criteria.

    Felix Day;Tugce Karaderi;Tugce Karaderi;Michelle R Jones;Cindy Meun

  • Anti-Müllerian Hormone Predicts Menopause: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study in Normoovulatory Women

    S.L. Broer;M.J. Eijkemans;G.J. Scheffer;I.A.L.M. van Rooij

  • Consensus on women's health aspects of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS)

    B. C. J. M. Fauser;B. C. Tarlatzis;R. W. Rebar;R. S. Legro

  • Genomic analyses identify hundreds of variants associated with age at menarche and support a role for puberty timing in cancer risk

    Day Fr;Thompson Dj;elgason H;Chasman Di

Frequent Co-Authors

Bart C.J.M. Fauser
Bart C.J.M. Fauser Utrecht University
Frank J.M. Broekmans
Frank J.M. Broekmans Utrecht University
Régine P.M. Steegers-Theunissen
Régine P.M. Steegers-Theunissen Erasmus University Rotterdam
Marinus J.C. Eijkemans
Marinus J.C. Eijkemans Utrecht University
Axel P. N. Themmen
Axel P. N. Themmen Erasmus University Rotterdam
Frank H. de Jong
Frank H. de Jong Erasmus University Rotterdam
André G. Uitterlinden
André G. Uitterlinden Erasmus University Rotterdam
Oscar H. Franco
Oscar H. Franco University Medical Center Utrecht
Nick S. Macklon
Nick S. Macklon University of Copenhagen
Ben Willem J. Mol
Ben Willem J. Mol Monash University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering alternative or complementary pathways to studying Medicine in the USA? A number of accredited online health-related degrees offer flexible options for those pursuing healthcare careers. For example, earning a healthcare administration associate degree online is a practical starting point for a career in hospital management, medical offices, or healthcare policy.

Nurses looking to expand their expertise can explore asn to np bridge programs, which enable registered nurses to advance directly to nurse practitioner roles, improving patient care and opening leadership opportunities.

Students passionate about diet, wellness, or preventive care should consider programs ranked among the best online nutrition programs. These degrees are perfect for aspiring nutritionists and health educators.

When choosing any healthcare program, it’s crucial to consider accreditation. Many seek out which online healthcare degree programs are recognized for their accreditation by cahme? This ensures the quality and credibility of your education, particularly in graduate-level healthcare administration.

Best Scientists Citing Joop S.E. Laven

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles