World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
96
Citations
32299
World Ranking
9712
National Ranking
378

Frank H. de Jong publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank H. de Jong sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 311 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Frank H. de Jong D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank H. de Jong sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 96 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frank H. de Jong is affiliated with Erasmus University Rotterdam in the Netherlands. Their research spans multiple areas primarily within medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a focus on endocrinology, diabetes, and metabolism.

The scientist's recent publications cover topics relevant to endocrinology and related medical fields. Notable papers include:

  • Levoketoconazole, the 2S,4R Enantiomer of Ketoconazole, a New Steroidogenesis Inhibitor for Cushing's Syndrome Treatment (2021, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism)
  • CYP11B1 variants influence skeletal maturation via alternative splicing (2021, Communications Biology)
  • Lessons Learned from 17 Years of Multidisciplinary Care for Differences of Sex Development Patients at a Single Indonesian Center (2023, Sexual Development)
  • 028 Fertility and ovarian function in high-dose estrogen-treated tall women (2022, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology)
  • Secondary Erythrocytosis in Patients With Heart Failure on SGLT2 Inhibitors: Insights from a Multicenter "Real World" Study (2025, The American Journal of Cardiology)

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Richard A. Feelders (2 co-authored works)
  • Leo J. Hofland (2 co-authored works)
  • Johannes Hofland (2 co-authored works)
  • Sara G Creemers (1 co-authored work)
  • Gaston J H Franssen (1 co-authored work)

Frank H. de Jong's research has appeared in several notable venues, including:

  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
  • Communications Biology
  • Sexual Development
  • European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
  • The American Journal of Cardiology

The main fields of study comprising their body of work are:

  • Medicine
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

More detailed subfields of research activity consist of:

  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Molecular Biology
  • Surgery
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
  • Genetics

The primary scientific topics addressed in their work include:

  • Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors
  • Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
  • Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
  • Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
  • Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension
  • Birth, Development, and Health
  • Sexual Differentiation and Disorders

Best Publications

  • Control of primordial follicle recruitment by anti-Müllerian hormone in the mouse ovary.

    Alexandra L. L. Durlinger;Piet Kramer;Bas Karels;Frank H. de Jong

  • Antimüllerian hormone serum levels: a putative marker for ovarian aging.

    Annemarie de Vet;Joop S.E. Laven;Frank H. de Jong;Axel P.N. Themmen

  • Anti-Müllerian hormone: a new marker for ovarian function

    Jenny A Visser;Frank H de Jong;Joop S E Laven;Axel P N Themmen

  • Anti-Müllerian Hormone Attenuates the Effects of FSH on Follicle Development in the Mouse Ovary

    Alexandra L. L. Durlinger;Maria J. G. Gruijters;Piet Kramer;Bas Karels

  • Measures of bioavailable serum testosterone and estradiol and their relationships with muscle strength, bone density, and body composition in elderly men.

    Annewieke W. van den Beld;Frank H. de Jong;Diederick E. Grobbee;Huibert A. P. Pols

  • Low levels of endogenous androgens increase the risk of atherosclerosis in elderly men : the Rotterdam Study

    A. Elisabeth Hak;Jacqueline C. M. Witteman;Frank H. de Jong;Mirjam I. Geerlings

  • Serum antimüllerian hormone levels best reflect the reproductive decline with age in normal women with proven fertility: A longitudinal study

    Ilse A.J. van Rooij;Frank J.M. Broekmans;Gabrielle J. Scheffer;Caspar W.N. Looman

  • Anti-Müllerian Hormone Serum Concentrations in Normoovulatory and Anovulatory Women of Reproductive Age

    Joop S. E. Laven;Annemarie G. M. G. J. Mulders;Jenny A. Visser;Axel P. Themmen

  • Corticosteroid therapy in severe illness

    Steven W.J. Lamberts;Hajo A. Bruining;Frank H. de Jong

  • Anti-Müllerian Hormone Levels in the Spontaneous Menstrual Cycle Do Not Show Substantial Fluctuation

    Wouter J. K. Hehenkamp;Caspar W. N. Looman;Axel P. N. Themmen;Frank H. de Jong

  • Predictors of poor ovarian response in in vitro fertilization: a prospective study comparing basal markers of ovarian reserve

    László F.J.M.M Bancsi;Frank J.M Broekmans;Marinus J.C Eijkemans;Frank H de Jong

  • Phase I study of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with [111In-DTPA0]octreotide: The rotterdam experience

    Roelf Valkema;Marion de Jong;Willem H. Bakker;Wout A.P. Breeman

  • Serum Anti-Müllerian Hormone Levels Reflect the Size of the Primordial Follicle Pool in Mice

    Marlies E. Kevenaar;Mohamed F. Meerasahib;Piet Kramer;Brigitte M. N. van de Lang-Born

  • Serum Inhibin B as a Marker of Spermatogenesis

    Frank H. Pierik;Jan T. M. Vreeburg;Theo Stijnen;Frank H. de Jong

  • Identification of the BclI polymorphism in the glucocorticoid receptor gene: association with sensitivity to glucocorticoids in vivo and body mass index

    Elisabeth F C van Rossum;Jan W Koper;Annewieke W van den Beld;André G Uitterlinden

  • A Polymorphism in the Glucocorticoid Receptor Gene, Which Decreases Sensitivity to Glucocorticoids In Vivo, Is Associated With Low Insulin and Cholesterol Levels

    Elisabeth F.C. van Rossum;Jan W. Koper;Nannette A.T.M. Huizenga;André G. Uitterlinden

  • Anti-müllerian Hormone Is a Promising Predictor for the Occurrence of the Menopausal Transition

    Ilse A.J. van Rooij;Isolde den Tonkelaar;Frank J.M. Broekmans;Caspar W.N. Looman

  • Growth patterns of nondominant ovarian follicles during the normal menstrual cycle

    Thierry D. Pache;Juriy W. Wladimiroff;Frank H. de Jong;Wim C. Hop

  • Loss of ovarian reserve after uterine artery embolization: a randomized comparison with hysterectomy

    Wouter J.K. Hehenkamp;Nicole A. Volkers;Frank J.M. Broekmans;Frank H. de Jong

  • Melatonin and melatonin-progestin combinations alter pituitary-ovarian function in women and can inhibit ovulation

    B. C. G. Voordouw;R. Euser;R. E. R. Verdonk;B. T. Alberda

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven W. J. Lamberts
Steven W. J. Lamberts Erasmus University Rotterdam
Bart C.J.M. Fauser
Bart C.J.M. Fauser Utrecht University
Axel P. N. Themmen
Axel P. N. Themmen Erasmus University Rotterdam
André G. Uitterlinden
André G. Uitterlinden Erasmus University Rotterdam
Huibert A. P. Pols
Huibert A. P. Pols Erasmus University Rotterdam
Joop S.E. Laven
Joop S.E. Laven Erasmus University Rotterdam
Albert Hofman
Albert Hofman Harvard University
Albert O. Brinkmann
Albert O. Brinkmann Erasmus University Rotterdam
Diederick E. Grobbee
Diederick E. Grobbee Utrecht University
Marinus J.C. Eijkemans
Marinus J.C. Eijkemans Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative pathways and online degrees is an excellent way to diversify your medical career options in the USA. For those interested in advanced nursing roles, consider the least expensive dnp programs, which prepare nurses for leadership and specialized clinical practice without breaking the bank.

If pharmacy is your calling, you can now find fully recognized pharmacy school online accredited options, providing flexibility and often lower costs than on-campus degrees.

Beyond direct patient care, the rise of digital health is fueling demand for technology-savvy professionals. Accredited health information technology programs online can prepare you for critical roles managing patient data, compliance, and information systems.

For a faster entry into the healthcare workforce, you might consider the average cost of medical billing and coding program and explore how this field blends medical knowledge with administrative expertise.

These online pathways can offer flexible, affordable alternatives or supplements to a traditional medical degree, supporting a wide range of career aspirations within healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Frank H. de Jong

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles