World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
37
Citations
7887
World Ranking
6160
National Ranking
440

Thomas Kalliath publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Kalliath sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 123 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Thomas Kalliath D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Kalliath sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas Kalliath is affiliated with the Australian National University in Australia and has contributed extensively to research in the fields of Social Sciences and Business, Management and Accounting. Their work primarily intersects areas such as Sociology and Political Science, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Gender Studies, and Public Administration.

The main topics covered in Thomas Kalliath's research include:

  • Work-Family Balance Challenges
  • Emotional Labor in Professions
  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Workaholism, burnout, and well-being
  • Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
  • Social Work Education and Practice

Their recent publications demonstrate a focus on the dynamics of work and family interaction, emotional labor, and organizational behavior within social work contexts. Notable papers include:

  • "Enhancing job satisfaction through work-family enrichment and perceived supervisor support: the case of Australian social workers," 2020, published in Personnel Review
  • "When the boss is blue: examining the effects of supervisors' negative emotions on subordinates' cognitive work engagement and family undermining," 2020, published in Personnel Review
  • "Keeping Work and Family Separate: A Serial Mediation Analysis of Social Workers' Work-Family Segmentation, Work-Family Enrichment and Job Performance in Australia," 2020, published in The British Journal of Social Work
  • "Examining the mediating role of self-efficacy in the relationship between perceived organizational support and work-family enrichment," 2022, published in International Journal of Stress Management
  • "Examining work-home segmentation as a coping strategy for frontline workers: a mixed method study of social workers across Australia," 2022, published in The International Journal of Human Resource Management

Thomas Kalliath frequently collaborates with several researchers, including:

  • Xi Wen Chan
  • Parveen Kalliath
  • Christopher Chan
  • David C. Cheng
  • Paula Brough

Their research has been published repeatedly in venues such as Personnel Review, The British Journal of Social Work, International Journal of Stress Management, and The International Journal of Human Resource Management, reflecting the interdisciplinary nature of their scholarly contributions.

Best Publications

  • Work–life balance: A review of the meaning of the balance construct

    Thomas Kalliath;Paula Brough

  • Polychronicity and the Inventory of Polychronic Values (IPV): The development of an instrument to measure a fundamental dimension of organizational culture

    Allen C. Bluedorn;Thomas J. Kalliath;Michael J Strube;Gregg D. Martin

  • Family-Responsive Interventions, Perceived Organizational and Supervisor Support, Work-Family Conflict, and Psychological Strain

    Michael Patrick O'Driscoll;Steven Poelmans;Paul E. Spector;Thomas Kalliath

  • Work–life balance: a longitudinal evaluation of a new measure across Australia and New Zealand workers

    Paula Brough;Carolyn Timms;Michael Patrick O'Driscoll;Thomas Kalliath

  • Role resources and work-family enrichment : the role of work engagement

    Oi-Ling Siu;Jia-fang Lu;Paula Brough;Chang-qin Lu

  • A test of value congruence effects

    Thomas J. Kalliath;Allen C. Bluedorn;Michael J Strube

  • Job satisfaction among nurses: a predictor of burnout levels

    Thomas Kalliath;Rita Morris

  • The ability of 'family friendly' organizational resources to predict work-family conflict and job and family satisfaction

    Paula Brough;Michael Patrick O'Driscoll;Thomas Kalliath

  • A test of the Maslach Burnout Inventory in three samples of healthcare professionals

    Thomas J. Kalliath;Michael P. O'Driscoll;David F. Gillespie;Allen C. Bluedorn

  • Stress and coping

    Michael Patrick O'Driscoll;Paula Brough;Thomas Kalliath

  • Flexible work arrangements, work engagement, turnover intentions and psychological health

    Carolyn Timms;Paula Brough;Michael Patrick O'Driscoll;Thomas Kalliath

  • A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Competing Values Instrument.

    Thomas J. Kalliath;Allen C. Bluedorn;David F. Gillespie

  • Work/Family Conflict, Psychological Well-Being, Satisfaction and Social Support: A Longitudinal Study in New Zealand

    Michael Patrick O'Driscoll;Paula Brough;Thomas Kalliath

  • Work–family enrichment and satisfaction: the mediating role of self-efficacy and work–life balance

    Xi Wen Chan;Thomas Kalliath;Paula Brough;Oi-Ling Siu

  • A confirmatory factor analysis of the General Health Questionnaire-12

    Thomas Kalliath;Michael Patrick O'Driscoll;Paula Brough

  • Is the Path to Burnout and Turnover Paved by a Lack of Supervisory Support? A Structural Equations Test

    Thomas J. Kalliath;Alexandra Beck

  • The relationship of social support with well-being outcomes via work–family conflict: Moderating effects of gender, dependants and nationality

    Suzie Drummond;Michael P. O’Driscoll;Paula Brough;Thomas Kalliath

  • Validation of the Job Demands-Resources model in cross-national samples: Cross-sectional and longitudinal predictions of psychological strain and work engagement

    Paula Brough;Carolyn Timms;Oi-Ling Siu;Thomas Kalliath

  • Achieving employee wellbeing in a changing work environment An expert commentary on current scholarship

    Ellen Ernst Kossek;Thomas Kalliath;Parveen Kalliath

  • Workplace Psychological Health: Current Research and Practice

    Paula Brough;Michael Patrick O'Driscoll;Thomas Kalliath;Cary L. Cooper

  • Self-efficacy and work engagement: test of a chain model

    Xi Wen Chan;Thomas Kalliath;Paula Brough;Michael O’Driscoll

Frequent Co-Authors

Paula Brough
Paula Brough Griffith University
Michael P. O'Driscoll
Michael P. O'Driscoll University of Waikato
Oi Ling Siu
Oi Ling Siu Lingnan University
Steven Poelmans
Steven Poelmans University of Antwerp
Cindy H.P. Sit
Cindy H.P. Sit Chinese University of Hong Kong
Cary L. Cooper
Cary L. Cooper University of Manchester
Michael J. Strube
Michael J. Strube Washington University in St. Louis
Arnold B. Bakker
Arnold B. Bakker Erasmus University Rotterdam
Tammy D. Allen
Tammy D. Allen University of South Florida
Juan I. Sanchez
Juan I. Sanchez Florida International University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens a variety of educational and professional opportunities. Online degrees are becoming increasingly popular, providing flexibility for both students and working professionals. Programs such as msw programs online allow learners to pursue a Master’s in Social Work at their own pace and often at a lower cost than on-campus options.

Those interested in behavior analysis can find bcba accredited programs online, which are essential for becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst. These programs meet the accreditation standards vital for future career advancement.

For those seeking to enter the workforce more quickly, accelerated online msw programs provide a fast-track path to a meaningful career in social services. Similarly, the fastest psychology degree programs enable students to complete their studies and specialize in fields such as counseling or human resources in less time.

Choosing the right online degree can open doors to diverse career paths in education, counseling, social work, and more—making it easier to align your studies with your personal and professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas Kalliath

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles