World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
45
Citations
12360
World Ranking
6564
National Ranking
3563

Juan I. Sanchez publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Juan I. Sanchez sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 91 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Juan I. Sanchez D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Juan I. Sanchez sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Juan I. Sanchez is affiliated with Florida International University in the United States and conducts research primarily in the fields of Business, Management and Accounting as well as Social Sciences. Their scholarly contributions focus largely on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Education, and Economics and Econometrics.

The scientist's research topics include:

  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Management and Organizational Studies
  • International Student and Expatriate Challenges
  • Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
  • Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions

Sanchez has published in a range of academic venues, with frequent publications in:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Journal of World Business
  • Organizational Research Methods
  • European Management Journal
  • Australian Journal of Career Development

Recent papers authored by Juan I. Sanchez include:

  • Combining interpretivism and positivism in international business research: The example of the expatriate role (2022), Journal of World Business
  • Assessing Common-Metric Effect Sizes to Refine Mediation Models (2023), Organizational Research Methods
  • The role of mindfulness on the relationship between job complexity and job crafting: A self-regulation approach (2025), European Management Journal
  • A Meta-Analysis of Neglected Artifacts in Organizational Behavior Mediation Research (2020), Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Does "Putting People First" Pay Off? Institutional Logics and Substantive Employee-Centric Signals (2023), Academy of Management Proceedings

Frequent collaborators of Sanchez include:

  • Chen Wang
  • Ajay Rama Ponnapalli
  • Hock-Peng Sin
  • Javier Gil Anton
  • Juan Carlos de Carlos

Best Publications

  • The Role of Social Support in the Process of Work Stress: A Meta-Analysis

    Chockalingam Viswesvaran;Juan I. Sanchez;Jeffrey Fisher

  • THE PRACTICE OF COMPETENCY MODELING

    Jeffery S. Shippmann;Ronald A. Ash;Mariangela Batjtsta;Linda Carr

  • Outcomes of Perceived Discrimination Among Hispanic Employees: Is Diversity Management a Luxury or a Necessity?

    Juan I. Sanchez;Petra Brock

  • CROSS-NATIONAL DIFFERENCES IN RELATIONSHIPS OF WORK DEMANDS, JOB SATISFACTION, AND TURNOVER INTENTIONS WITH WORK-FAMILY CONFLICT

    Paul E. Spector;Tammy D. Allen;Steven A.Y. Poelmans;Laurent M. Lapierre

  • A CROSS‐NATIONAL COMPARATIVE STUDY OF WORK‐FAMILY STRESSORS, WORKING HOURS, AND WELL‐BEING: CHINA AND LATIN AMERICA VERSUS THE ANGLO WORLD

    Paul E. Spector;Cary L. Cooper;Steven A.Y. Poelmans;Tammy D. Allen

  • Family-Responsive Interventions, Perceived Organizational and Supervisor Support, Work-Family Conflict, and Psychological Strain

    Michael Patrick O'Driscoll;Steven Poelmans;Paul E. Spector;Thomas Kalliath

  • Locus of control and well-being at work: how generalizable are western findings

    Paul E. Spector;Cary L. Cooper;Juan I. Sanchez;Michael O'Driscoll

  • Family-supportive organization perceptions, multiple dimensions of work–family conflict, and employee satisfaction: A test of model across five samples

    Laurent M. Lapierre;Paul E. Spector;Tammy D. Allen;Steven Poelmans

  • Acculturative Stress Among Hispanics: A Bidimensional Model of Ethnic Identification

    Juan I. Sánchez;Diana M. Fernández

  • Do national levels of individualism and internal locus of control relate to well- being : an ecological level international study

    Paul E. Spector;Cary L. Cooper;Juan I. Sanchez;Michael O’Driscoll

  • Adapting to a boundaryless world: A developmental expatriate model

    Juan I. Sanchez;Paul E. Spector;Cary L. Cooper

  • Easing the inferential leap in competency modeling: The effects of task-related information and subject matter expertise

    Filip Lievens;Juan I. Sanchez;Wilfried De Corte

  • Arabinoxylan-oligosaccharides (AXOS) affect the protein/carbohydrate fermentation balance and microbial population dynamics of the Simulator of Human Intestinal Microbial Ecosystem

    J.I. Sanchez;M. Marzorati;C. Grootaert;M. Baran

  • Corporate support in the aftermath of a natural disaster: Effects on employee strains

    Juan I. Sanchez;William P. Korbin;Diana M. Viscarra

  • Cross-Cultural Differences on Work-to-Family Conflict and Role Satisfaction: A Taiwanese-British Comparison

    Luo Lu;Cary L. Cooper;Shu-Fang Kao;Shu-Fang Kao;Ting-Ting Chang

  • What is (or should be) the difference between competency modeling and traditional job analysis

    Juan I. Sanchez;Edward L. Levine

  • The Rise and Fall of Job Analysis and the Future of Work Analysis

    Juan I. Sanchez;Edward L. Levine

  • An international comparative study of work-family stress and occupational strain

    Paul E. Spector;Tammy D. Allen;Steven Poelmans;Cary L. Cooper

  • Eastern versus Western Control Beliefs at Work: An Investigation of Secondary Control, Socioinstrumental Control, and Work Locus of Control in China and the US

    Paul E. Spector;Juan I. Sanchez;Oi Ling Siu;Jesus Salgado

  • The Effects of Diversity Awareness Training on Differential Treatment

    Juan I. Sanchez;Nohora Medkik

  • A cross-national comparative study of work-family stress

    Paul E. Spector;Cary L. Cooper;Steven A. Y. Poelmans;Tammy D. Allen

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul E. Spector
Paul E. Spector University of South Florida
Cary L. Cooper
Cary L. Cooper University of Manchester
Michael P. O'Driscoll
Michael P. O'Driscoll University of Waikato
Steven Poelmans
Steven Poelmans University of Antwerp
Tammy D. Allen
Tammy D. Allen University of South Florida
Luo Lu
Luo Lu National Taiwan University
Oi Ling Siu
Oi Ling Siu Lingnan University
Paula Brough
Paula Brough Griffith University
Jesús F. Salgado
Jesús F. Salgado University of Santiago de Compostela
Chockalingam Viswesvaran
Chockalingam Viswesvaran Florida International University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online psychology degrees have become a popular option for students seeking flexibility and accessibility. These programs cater to a diverse range of learners, from working professionals to those unable to relocate. Students can choose from top-rated programs across the country, such as the online psychology programs in California and the best online psychology program rankings in Illinois, both of which offer a wide variety of concentrations and specializations.

For those planning to advance their careers, pursuing a doctorate can open doors to research, academia, or clinical practice. The best online doctorate in psychology degree programs ranking in America highlights institutions that deliver quality doctoral education fully online.

Whether you aim for a bachelor’s or advanced degree, selecting the right program is crucial for career progression. Regions such as Massachusetts offer strong choices, with the best online psychology program rankings in Massachusetts showcasing leading options for students. By comparing rankings and program strengths, students can align their education with clear career pathways in counseling, therapy, research, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Juan I. Sanchez

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles