World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 52 4395 4208 154 148 146 14573

Scott B. Power publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Scott B. Power between 1989 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Scott B. Power published across 37 years, from 1989 to 2025, averaging 4.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2011. 17 of the 171 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2011. 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 5 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 3 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 4 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 10 publications
1989 2025

171 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Scott B. Power: publications per year, 1989 to 2025
Year Publications
1989 1
1990 2
1991 1
1992 1
1993 1
1994 5
1995 5
1996 1
1997 2
1998 0
1999 3
2000 5
2001 1
2002 3
2003 0
2004 1
2005 4
2006 4
2007 4
2008 5
2009 6
2010 3
2011 13
2012 3
2013 5
2014 13
2015 4
2016 7
2017 10
2018 7
2019 9
2020 5
2021 4
2022 6
2023 10
2024 7
2025 10
Total 171
Download as CSV

Scott B. Power publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott B. Power sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 146 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541 146
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Scott B. Power D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott B. Power sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266 52
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Scott B. Power is affiliated with the Bureau of Meteorology in Australia and conducts research focused on environmental science and earth and planetary sciences. Their work spans several subfields, including global and planetary change, atmospheric science, oceanography, ecology, evolution, behavior and systematics, and water science and technology.

The scientist's primary research topics include climate variability and models, meteorological phenomena and simulations, tropical and extratropical cyclones research, hydrology and drought analysis, climate change impacts on agriculture, oceanographic and atmospheric processes, and hydrology and watershed management studies.

Scott B. Power has contributed to publications in various scientific venues, with frequent appearances in:

  • Climate Dynamics
  • Journal of Climate
  • Earth s Future
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Climatic Change

Their recent research papers include:

  • Insights From CMIP6 for Australia's Future Climate (2020, Earth s Future)
  • Evaluating Climate Models with the CLIVAR 2020 ENSO Metrics Package (2020, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society)
  • Decadal climate variability in the tropical Pacific: Characteristics, causes, predictability, and prospects (2021, Science)
  • More accurate quantification of model-to-model agreement in externally forced climatic responses over the coming century (2021, Nature Communications)
  • Climate Change Projections for the Australian Monsoon From CMIP6 Models (2020, Geophysical Research Letters)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Scott B. Power include:

  • Surendra Rauniyar
  • Sugata Narsey
  • Ghyslaine Boschat
  • Zoe E. Gillett
  • François Delage

Best Publications

  • Inter-decadal modulation of the impact of ENSO on Australia

    S. Power;T. Casey;C. Folland;A. Colman

  • The impact of global warming on the tropical Pacific Ocean and El Nino

    Mat Collins;Mat Collins;Soon Il An;Wenju Cai;Alexandre Ganachaud

  • Near-term climate change: Projections and predictability

    Ben Kirtman;Scott B. Power;Akintayo John Adedoyin;George J. Boer

  • El Niño–Southern Oscillation complexity

    Axel Timmermann;Axel Timmermann;Soon Il An;Jong Seong Kug;Fei Fei Jin

  • A Tripole Index for the Interdecadal Pacific Oscillation

    Benjamin J. Henley;Joelle Gergis;David J. Karoly;Scott Power

  • Robust twenty-first-century projections of El Niño and related precipitation variability

    Scott Power;François Delage;Christine Chung;Greg Kociuba

  • STOIC: a study of coupled model climatology and variability in tropical ocean regions

    M. K. Davey;M. Huddleston;K. R. Sperber;P. Braconnot

  • The Predictability of Interdecadal Changes in ENSO Activity and ENSO Teleconnections

    Scott Power;Malcolm Haylock;Rob Colman;Xiangdong Wang

  • ENSIP: The El Niño simulation intercomparison project

    Mojib Latif;K. Sperber;J. Arblaster;P. Braconnot

  • Insights from CMIP6 for Australia's future climate

    Michael Richard Grose;Sugata Narsey;Francois Delage;Andrew J. Dowdy

  • More extreme swings of the South Pacific convergence zone due to greenhouse warming

    Wenju Cai;Matthieu Lengaigne;Simon Borlace;Matthew Collins;Matthew Collins

  • Evaluating Climate Models with the CLIVAR 2020 ENSO Metrics Package

    Yann Y. Planton;Eric Guilyardi;Andrew T. Wittenberg;Jiwoo Lee

  • Weakening of the Walker Circulation and apparent dominance of El Niño both reach record levels, but has ENSO really changed?

    Scott B. Power;Ian N. Smith

  • Decadal climate variability in Australia during the twentieth century

    Scott Power;Faina Tseitkin;Vikram Mehta;Beth Lavery

  • Decadal climate variability in the tropical Pacific: Characteristics, causes, predictability, and prospects.

    Scott Power;Scott Power;Matthieu Lengaigne;Antonietta Capotondi;Antonietta Capotondi;Myriam Khodri

  • The eastward shift of the Walker Circulation in response to global warming and its relationship to ENSO variability

    Tobias Bayr;Dietmar Dommenget;Thomas Martin;Scott Brendan Power

  • Inability of CMIP5 Models to Simulate Recent Strengthening of the Walker Circulation: Implications for Projections

    Greg Kociuba;Scott B. Power

  • Attribution of the Late-Twentieth-Century Rainfall Decline in Southwest Australia

    Bertrand Timbal;Julie M. Arblaster;Scott Power

  • Towards operational predictions of the near-term climate

    Yochanan Kushnir;Adam A. Scaife;Adam A. Scaife;Raymond Arritt;Gianpaolo Balsamo

  • A multiproxy index of the El Niño–Southern Oscillation, A.D. 1525–1982

    Karl Braganza;Joëlle L. Gergis;Scott B. Power;James S. Risbey

Frequent Co-Authors

Shayne McGregor
Shayne McGregor Monash University
Neil J. Holbrook
Neil J. Holbrook University of Tasmania
Wenju Cai
Wenju Cai Ocean University of China
Robert Colman
Robert Colman Bureau of Meteorology
Eric Guilyardi
Eric Guilyardi Université Paris Cité
Richard Kleeman
Richard Kleeman Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
Gerald A. Meehl
Gerald A. Meehl National Center for Atmospheric Research
George J. Boer
George J. Boer Environment and Climate Change Canada
Axel Timmermann
Axel Timmermann Pusan National University
Julie M. Arblaster
Julie M. Arblaster National Center for Atmospheric Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to diverse career opportunities, often supported by complementary degrees. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) play a critical role in environmental analysis, making it valuable to explore the best GIS schools to gain specialized technical skills in mapping and spatial data.

Leadership and policy development are equally important as environmental challenges grow. Professionals looking to advance in public administration might consider fast-tracking their education through 1 year MPA online programs, providing practical governance expertise relevant to environmental regulation and sustainable development.

Understanding societal impacts and human behavior is essential for addressing environmental issues. Online degrees that deepen this knowledge, such as the best online bachelors in sociology programs, complement environmental science studies by highlighting social dynamics and community engagement tactics.

For those seeking advanced research or academic leadership roles, pursuing a doctoral degree can be achievable without traditional hurdles. The option of online doctoral programs without dissertation offers a flexible path to doctoral credentials, accommodating professionals balancing careers and further education.

Best Scientists Citing Scott B. Power

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles