World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
42
Citations
6305
World Ranking
7446
National Ranking
2653

Richard Kleeman publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Kleeman sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 74 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Richard Kleeman D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Kleeman sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard Kleeman is affiliated with the Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences in the United States. This institution is known for its contributions to applied mathematics, computer science, and related scientific fields.

The available data does not include recent publications, co-authors, or specific fields of study that Kleeman has contributed to. There is likewise no information on awards or book publications associated with this researcher.

Since no detailed information is provided about their specific research areas, topics, or subfields, the profile focuses on their institutional affiliation as a primary point of reference.

Best Publications

  • A review of the predictability and prediction of ENSO

    Mojib Latif;D. Anderson;T. Barnett;M. Cane

  • Rectification of the Madden-Julian Oscillation into the ENSO Cycle.

    William S. Kessler;Richard Kleeman

  • Stochastic Forcing of ENSO by the Intraseasonal Oscillation

    Andrew M. Moore;Richard Kleeman

  • A mechanism for generating ENSO decadal variability

    Richard Kleeman;Julian P. McCreary;Barry A. Klinger

  • Greenhouse Warming, Decadal Variability, or El Niño? An Attempt to Understand the Anomalous 1990s

    Mojib Latif;Richard Kleeman;Christian Eckert

  • Measuring Dynamical Prediction Utility Using Relative Entropy

    Richard Kleeman

  • The dynamics of error growth and predictability in a coupled model of ENSO

    Andrew M. Moore;Richard Kleeman

  • A Theory for the Limitation of ENSO Predictability Due to Stochastic Atmospheric Transients

    Richard Kleeman;Andrew M. Moore

  • A new intermediate coupled model for El Niño simulation and prediction

    Rong Hua Zhang;Rong Hua Zhang;Stephen E. Zebiak;Richard Kleeman;Noel Keenlyside

  • The Linear Response of ENSO to the Madden–Julian Oscillation

    Javier Zavala-Garay;C. Zhang;A. M. Moore;R. Kleeman

  • A mathematical framework for quantifying predictability through relative entropy

    David Cai;Richard Kleeman;Andrew Majda

  • Annual cycle of equatorial zonal currents in the Pacific

    Noel Keenlyside;Richard Kleeman

  • Retrospective El Niño Forecasts Using an Improved Intermediate Coupled Model

    Rong Hua Zhang;Stephen E. Zebiak;Richard Kleeman;Noel Keenlyside

  • Epochal changes in Indian Monsoon-ENSO precursors

    K. Krishna Kumar;R. Kleeman;Mark A. Cane;Balaji Rajagopalan

  • Information Theory and Dynamical System Predictability

    Richard Kleeman

  • On the Dependence of Hindcast Skill on Ocean Thermodynamics in a Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere Model

    Richard Kleeman

  • Assimilation of Subsurface Thermal Data into a Simple Ocean Model for the Initialization of an Intermediate Tropical Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere Forecast Model

    Richard Kleeman;Andrew M. Moore;Neville R. Smith

  • The Response of a Coupled Model of ENSO to Observed Estimates of Stochastic Forcing

    Javier Zavala-Garay;A. M. Moore;C. L. Perez;R. Kleeman

  • The Nonnormal Nature of El Niño and Intraseasonal Variability

    Andrew M. Moore;Richard Kleeman

  • A Comparison of the Influence of Additive and Multiplicative Stochastic Forcing on a Coupled Model of ENSO

    Christina L. Perez;Andrew M. Moore;Javier Zavala-Garay;Richard Kleeman

  • Interannual and Decadal Variability in an Intermediate Coupled Model of the Pacific Region

    A. M. Y. Solomon;Julian P. Mccreary;Richard Kleeman;Barry A. Klinger

  • The BMRC Coupled General Circulation Model ENSO Forecast System

    Guomin Wang;Richard Kleeman;Neville Smith;Faina Tseitkin

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew M. Moore
Andrew M. Moore University of California, Santa Cruz
Scott B. Power
Scott B. Power Bureau of Meteorology
Jérôme Vialard
Jérôme Vialard Université Paris Cité
Andrew J. Majda
Andrew J. Majda Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
Noel Keenlyside
Noel Keenlyside University of Bergen
Mojib Latif
Mojib Latif GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel
Mark A. Cane
Mark A. Cane Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Julian P. McCreary
Julian P. McCreary University of Hawaii at Manoa
Stephen E. Zebiak
Stephen E. Zebiak Columbia University
Anthony Rosati
Anthony Rosati National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related fields can broaden career opportunities. For instance, programs like the dsw programs offer advanced knowledge that combines social aspects with environmental justice, preparing graduates for impactful social work within environmental contexts.

If you're looking for flexibility and cost-efficiency, some of the cheapest online general studies degree programs provide a versatile foundation. These degrees allow students to tailor their coursework toward environmental topics while gaining broad interdisciplinary skills.

For those aiming for a smoother educational path, certain easiest bachelor degree programs include options that emphasize environmental studies. These can be ideal for balancing work, life, and study commitments without compromising on learning quality.

Specific to the sciences, pursuing a degree in geosciences or geology can complement environmental expertise. The geoscience online degree programs offer specialized knowledge about Earth systems, critical for a career in environmental consulting or research.

Exploring these related online degrees can expand your understanding of environmental issues and enhance career pathways in sustainability, conservation, policy, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Richard Kleeman

Recently Published Articles