World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
55
Citations
12149
World Ranking
3823
National Ranking
1460

Andrew M. Moore publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew M. Moore sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 153 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Andrew M. Moore D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew M. Moore sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andrew M. Moore is affiliated with the University of California, Santa Cruz in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Earth and Planetary Sciences, particularly within the fields of Oceanography and Environmental Science.

The scientist's work covers several key subfields, including:

  • Oceanography
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • General Health Professions

Major topics of their research include:

  • Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Climate variability and models
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Marine and coastal ecosystems
  • Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Marine Biology and Ecology Research

Andrew M. Moore has authored multiple publications in prominent scientific venues. These include a notable presence in the journal Ocean Modelling, with 10 publications, as well as contributions to the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Progress In Oceanography, Frontiers in Marine Science, and the International Journal of Social Policy and Education.

Recent papers by Moore include:

  • Regional and basin scale applications of ensemble adjustment Kalman filter and 4D-Var ocean data assimilation systems, 2020, Progress In Oceanography

Other recent relevant papers in related areas authored by collaborators include:

  • Ocean biogeochemical modelling, 2022, Nature Reviews Methods Primers
  • Current Challenges and Future Directions in Data Assimilation and Reanalysis, 2022, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • A data-assimilative model reanalysis of the U.S. Mid Atlantic Bight and Gulf of Maine: Configuration and comparison to observations and global ocean models, 2022, Progress In Oceanography
  • The Inner-Shelf Dynamics Experiment, 2020, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society

Frequent collaborators in Moore's research include John Wilkin, Hernan G. Arango, Christopher A. Edwards, Julia Levin, and Katja Fennel, indicating a network of collaboration primarily in oceanographic and atmospheric sciences.

Best Publications

  • Coupled ocean–atmosphere dynamics in the Indian Ocean during 1997–98

    Peter J. Webster;Andrew M. Moore;Johannes P. Loschnigg;Robert R. Leben

  • Ocean forecasting in terrain-following coordinates: Formulation and skill assessment of the Regional Ocean Modeling System

    D. B. Haidvogel;H. Arango;W. P. Budgell;B. D. Cornuelle

  • Impacts of the 2015–2016 El Niño on the California Current System: Early assessment and comparison to past events

    Michael G. Jacox;Michael G. Jacox;Elliott L. Hazen;Katherine D. Zaba;Daniel L. Rudnick

  • Stochastic Forcing of ENSO by the Intraseasonal Oscillation

    Andrew M. Moore;Richard Kleeman

  • The Regional Ocean Modeling System (ROMS) 4-dimensional variational data assimilation systems Part I - System overview and formulation

    Andrew M. Moore;Hernan G. Arango;Gregoire Broquet;Brian S. Powell

  • A comprehensive ocean prediction and analysis system based on the tangent linear and adjoint of a regional ocean model

    Andrew M. Moore;Hernan G. Arango;Emanuele Di Lorenzo;Bruce D. Cornuelle

  • The dynamics of error growth and predictability in a coupled model of ENSO

    Andrew M. Moore;Richard Kleeman

  • A Theory for the Limitation of ENSO Predictability Due to Stochastic Atmospheric Transients

    Richard Kleeman;Andrew M. Moore

  • The Regional Ocean Modeling System (ROMS) 4-dimensional variational data assimilation systems: Part II – Performance and application to the California Current System

    Andrew M. Moore;Hernan G. Arango;Gregoire Broquet;Chris Edwards

  • Regional Ocean Data Assimilation

    Christopher A. Edwards;Andrew M. Moore;Ibrahim Hoteit;Bruce D. Cornuelle

  • Nutrient and salinity decadal variations in the central and eastern North Pacific

    E. Di Lorenzo;J. Fiechter;N. Schneider;A. Bracco

  • ENSO and the California Current coastal upwelling response

    Michael G. Jacox;Jerome Fiechter;Andrew M. Moore;Christopher A. Edwards

  • The Regional Ocean Modeling System (ROMS) 4-dimensional variational data assimilation systems Part III - Observation impact and observation sensitivity in the California Current System

    Andrew M. Moore;Hernan G. Arango;Gregoire Broquet;Chris Edwards

  • 4DVAR data assimilation in the Intra-Americas Sea with the Regional Ocean Modeling System (ROMS)

    B. S. Powell;Hernan Arango;A. M. Moore;E. Di Lorenzo

  • Interdecadal modulation of Australian rainfall

    J. M. Arblaster;G. A. Meehl;A. M. Moore

  • Synthesis of Ocean Observations Using Data Assimilation for Operational, Real-Time and Reanalysis Systems: A More Complete Picture of the State of the Ocean.

    Andrew M. Moore;Matthew J. Martin;Santha Akella;Hernan G. Arango

  • Weak and strong constraint data assimilation in the inverse Regional Ocean Modeling System (ROMS): Development and application for a baroclinic coastal upwelling system

    Emanuele Di Lorenzo;Andrew M. Moore;Hernan G. Arango;Bruce D. Cornuelle

  • Ocean biogeochemical modelling

    Unknown

  • The Linear Response of ENSO to the Madden–Julian Oscillation

    Javier Zavala-Garay;C. Zhang;A. M. Moore;R. Kleeman

  • Spatially resolved upwelling in the California Current System and its connections to climate variability

    M. G. Jacox;A. M. Moore;C. A. Edwards;J. Fiechter

  • Application of 4D-Variational data assimilation to the California Current System

    G. Broquet;C.A. Edwards;A.M. Moore;B.S. Powell

Frequent Co-Authors

Christopher A. Edwards
Christopher A. Edwards University of California, Santa Cruz
Richard Kleeman
Richard Kleeman Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
Michael G. Jacox
Michael G. Jacox National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Bruce D. Cornuelle
Bruce D. Cornuelle University of California, San Diego
Arthur J. Miller
Arthur J. Miller University of California, San Diego
Jérôme Vialard
Jérôme Vialard Université Paris Cité
Emanuele Di Lorenzo
Emanuele Di Lorenzo Georgia Institute of Technology
John Wilkin
John Wilkin Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Thomas M. Powell
Thomas M. Powell University of California, Berkeley
Grant Branstator
Grant Branstator National Center for Atmospheric Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Many opt for affordable and flexible options, such as a cheap online general studies degree, which provides a broad foundation that can complement specialized environmental knowledge.

If you are looking for a less intensive path that still enhances your qualifications, consider fields noted for being manageable, like those highlighted in the easiest bachelor degree programs list. These degrees can help balance study load while progressing toward your career goals.

More focused study options include geology and geology-related programs, which deepen understanding of earth systems — crucial for environmental science careers. The best online geology degree programs offer robust curricula tailored for aspiring environmental professionals.

Additionally, mastery of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) is increasingly valuable. Pursuing one of the top gis masters programs enhances skills in spatial data analysis, essential for roles in environmental planning and natural resource management.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew M. Moore

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles