World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
30
Citations
7410
World Ranking
13854
National Ranking
5503

Salvatore Scellato publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Salvatore Scellato sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 40 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Salvatore Scellato D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Salvatore Scellato sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Salvatore Scellato is affiliated with Google in the United States, actively contributing to research in areas that intersect physics, social sciences, and geographic analysis. Their work predominantly focuses on complex network analysis and human mobility patterns, with a notable emphasis on location-based social networks and online social interactions.

The scientist's research spans several main fields of study including:

  • Physics and Astronomy
  • Social Sciences

Subfields of particular interest encompass statistical and nonlinear physics, transportation, computer science applications, computer networks and communications, and geography, planning, and development.

Within these domains, key research topics addressed by Salvatore Scellato include:

  • Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
  • Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
  • Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
  • Opportunistic and Delay-Tolerant Networks
  • Geographic Information Systems Studies
  • Social Media and Politics

Salvatore Scellato has multiple publications featured in the Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, illustrating consistent involvement with this venue. Some of the recent papers include:

  • "An Empirical Study of Geographic User Activity Patterns in Foursquare," 2021, Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • "Socio-Spatial Properties of Online Location-Based Social Networks," 2021, Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • "Exploiting Semantic Annotations for Clustering Geographic Areas and Users in Location-based Social Networks," 2021, Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • "The Length of Bridge Ties: Structural and Geographic Properties of Online Social Interactions," 2021, Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • "Where Online Friends Meet: Social Communities in Location-Based Networks," 2021, Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media

The scientist frequently collaborates with several other researchers, with notable co-authors being:

  • Cecilia Mascolo
  • Anastasios Noulas
  • Massimiliano Pontil
  • Renaud Lambiotte
  • Yana Volkovich

Salvatore Scellato's work centers on examining geographic user activity and socio-spatial properties within online networks, often exploring semantic annotations and structural properties related to social ties and communities. This research contributes to understanding spatial and social dynamics in digital environments, combining methods from physics and social sciences with applications to technology and social media platforms.

Best Publications

  • A tale of many cities: universal patterns in human urban mobility.

    Anastasios Noulas;Salvatore Scellato;Renaud Lambiotte;Massimiliano Pontil

  • An Empirical Study of Geographic User Activity Patterns in Foursquare.

    Anastasios Noulas;Salvatore Scellato;Cecilia Mascolo;Massimiliano Pontil

  • Exploiting place features in link prediction on location-based social networks

    Salvatore Scellato;Anastasios Noulas;Cecilia Mascolo

  • Socio-Spatial Properties of Online Location-Based Social Networks.

    Salvatore Scellato;Anastasios Noulas;Renaud Lambiotte;Cecilia Mascolo

  • Structural properties of planar graphs of urban street patterns.

    Alessio Cardillo;Salvatore Scellato;Vito Latora;Sergio Porta

  • Mining User Mobility Features for Next Place Prediction in Location-Based Services

    Anastasios Noulas;Salvatore Scellato;Neal Lathia;Cecilia Mascolo

  • NextPlace: a spatio-temporal prediction framework for pervasive systems

    Salvatore Scellato;Mirco Musolesi;Cecilia Mascolo;Vito Latora

  • Small-world behavior in time-varying graphs.

    J. Tang;S. Scellato;M. Musolesi;C. Mascolo

  • Geo-spotting: mining online location-based services for optimal retail store placement

    Dmytro Karamshuk;Anastasios Noulas;Salvatore Scellato;Vincenzo Nicosia

  • SIFT Features Tracking for Video Stabilization

    S. Battiato;G. Gallo;G. Puglisi;S. Scellato

  • Distance matters: geo-social metrics for online social networks

    Salvatore Scellato;Cecilia Mascolo;Mirco Musolesi;Vito Latora

  • YouTube around the world: geographic popularity of videos

    Anders Brodersen;Salvatore Scellato;Mirjam Wattenhofer

  • Exploiting semantic annotations for clustering geographic areas and users in location-based social networks

    Anastasios Noulas;Salvatore Scellato;Cecilia Mascolo;Massimiliano Pontil

  • A Random Walk around the City: New Venue Recommendation in Location-Based Social Networks

    Anastasios Noulas;Salvatore Scellato;Neal Lathia;Cecilia Mascolo

  • Evolution and sustainability of a wildlife monitoring sensor network

    Vladimir Dyo;Stephen A. Ellwood;David W. Macdonald;Andrew Markham

  • Track globally, deliver locally: improving content delivery networks by tracking geographic social cascades

    Salvatore Scellato;Cecilia Mascolo;Mirco Musolesi;Jon Crowcroft

  • WILDSENSING: Design and deployment of a sustainable sensor network for wildlife monitoring

    Vladimir Dyo;Stephen A. Ellwood;David W. Macdonald;Andrew Markham

  • Correction: A Tale of Many Cities: Universal Patterns in Human Urban Mobility

    Anastasios Noulas;Salvatore Scellato;Renaud Lambiotte;Massimiliano Pontil

  • Evolution of a location-based online social network: analysis and models

    Miltiadis Allamanis;Salvatore Scellato;Cecilia Mascolo

  • Traffic optimization in transport networks based on local routing

    Salvatore Scellato;Luigi Fortuna;Luigi Fortuna;Mattia Frasca;Mattia Frasca;Jesús Gómez-Gardeñes;Jesús Gómez-Gardeñes;Jesús Gómez-Gardeñes

  • Evaluating Temporal Robustness of Mobile Networks

    S. Scellato;I. Leontiadis;C. Mascolo;P. Basu

Frequent Co-Authors

Cecilia Mascolo
Cecilia Mascolo University of Cambridge
Vito Latora
Vito Latora Queen Mary University of London
Mirco Musolesi
Mirco Musolesi University College London
Jesús Gómez-Gardeñes
Jesús Gómez-Gardeñes University of Zaragoza
Ilias Leontiadis
Ilias Leontiadis Facebook (United States)
Fahui Wang
Fahui Wang Louisiana State University
Massimiliano Pontil
Massimiliano Pontil Italian Institute of Technology
Mattia Frasca
Mattia Frasca University of Catania
Renaud Lambiotte
Renaud Lambiotte University of Oxford
Sebastiano Battiato
Sebastiano Battiato University of Catania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens up a variety of related online degrees and career opportunities. Many students are now considering multidisciplinary fields to broaden their career options and expertise.

For those interested in sustainable technology, pursuing an environmental engineering degree can be a great choice, integrating computer science with environmental problem solving. Similarly, those looking for affordability and flexibility might explore the cheapest online master's mechanical engineering programs to combine computing skills with engineering innovation.

A strong foundation in science is also essential for tech careers. An online physics bachelor's degree provides analytical skills that are highly valued in software development and research.

Data-driven industries continue to grow, making data science an attractive pathway. If affordability is a priority, you may want to find out what is the cheapest data science course in the us? to kickstart your journey in this high-demand field.

Best Scientists Citing Salvatore Scellato

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles