World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 54 2138 1944 1030 924 141 13111

Fahui Wang publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Fahui Wang between 1995 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Fahui Wang published across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025, averaging 8.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 42 publications in 2023. 38 of the 251 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 42. Peak 42 publications in 2023. 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 5 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 5 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 42 publications 2024: 16 publications 2025: 22 publications
1995 2025

251 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Fahui Wang: publications per year, 1995 to 2025
Year Publications
1995 1
1996 1
1997 0
1998 1
1999 5
2000 1
2001 2
2002 2
2003 3
2004 4
2005 6
2006 11
2007 1
2008 5
2009 8
2010 11
2011 9
2012 8
2013 3
2014 12
2015 10
2016 2
2017 8
2018 8
2019 8
2020 10
2021 14
2022 17
2023 42
2024 16
2025 22
Total 251
Download as CSV

Fahui Wang publications per year - data summary

  • Fahui Wang, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from Louisiana State University, has 251 publications recorded across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1995 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2023, with 42 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1995, 1996, 1998, 2000 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 1 of the 31 years in the span carries no publications at all (1997).
  • The rate of publication averages 8.1 papers per year over the whole span, or 8.4 per year counting only the 30 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 111 publications, 44% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1995-2005: 26 publications (2.4 per year); 2006-2016: 80 publications (7.3 per year); 2017-2025: 145 publications (16.1 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Fahui Wang publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fahui Wang sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 134–143 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 141 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434 141
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Fahui Wang publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 54 ranges running from 44–53 to 570+ publications.
  • Fahui Wang, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from Louisiana State University, records 141 publications - the 37th percentile of the discipline.
  • 37% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Fahui Wang, and about 63% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 164–173 publications range, and Fahui Wang ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 114–123 publications, holding 474 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 174–183 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 570 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Fahui Wang D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fahui Wang sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131 54
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Fahui Wang D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 71 ranges running from 30 to 100+ D-Index.
  • Fahui Wang, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from Louisiana State University, records 54 D-Index - the 73rd percentile of the discipline.
  • 73% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Fahui Wang, and about 27% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 45 D-Index range, and Fahui Wang ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 42 D-Index, holding 313 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more, 97 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

Fahui Wang is affiliated with Louisiana State University in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on engineering and social sciences. Within these domains, their work concentrates on subfields such as transportation, materials chemistry, electrical and electronic engineering, oncology, and epidemiology.

The scientist's research topics highlight a strong emphasis on various aspects of transport and health-related spatial analysis. Key topics include:

  • Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
  • Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
  • Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Transportation Planning and Optimization
  • Combustion and flame dynamics
  • Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies

Fahui Wang has contributed research papers to several notable publication venues, with a significant presence in:

  • International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
  • LSU Digital Commons (Louisiana State University)
  • Annals of GIS
  • Transactions in GIS
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Among recent research outputs, selected papers include:

  • "From 2SFCA to i2SFCA: integration, derivation and validation" (2020), published in International Journal of Geographical Information Systems
  • "Equalizing the spatial accessibility of emergency medical services in Shanghai: A trade-off perspective" (2021), published in Computers Environment and Urban Systems
  • "Network optimization approach to delineating health care service areas: Spatially constrained Louvain and Leiden algorithms" (2020), published in Transactions in GIS
  • "Gd2O3 nanoparticles modified g-C3N4 with enhanced photocatalysis activity for degradation of organic pollutants" (2021), published in Journal of Rare Earths
  • "Estimating a large drive time matrix between ZIP codes in the United States: A differential sampling approach" (2020), published in Journal of Transport Geography

The scientist has also worked collaboratively with frequently co-authoring researchers including Tracy Onega, Lingbo Liu, Changzhen Wang, Guoyan Chen, and Haoxin Deng. These partnerships have resulted in repeated collaborative publications, supporting interdisciplinary research efforts.

Best Publications

  • Measures of Spatial Accessibility to Health Care in a GIS Environment: Synthesis and a Case Study in the Chicago Region

    Unknown

  • Assessing spatial and nonspatial factors for healthcare access: towards an integrated approach to defining health professional shortage areas.

    Fahui Wang;Wei Luo

  • Measurement, Optimization, and Impact of Health Care Accessibility: A Methodological Review

    Fahui Wang

  • Exploring the network structure and nodal centrality of China’s air transport network: A complex network approach

    Jiaoe Wang;Huihui Mo;Fahui Wang;Fengjun Jin

  • Street centrality and densities of retail and services in Bologna, Italy

    S. Porta;V. Latora;Fahui Wang;E. Strano

  • Urban land uses and traffic 'source-sink areas': Evidence from GPS-enabled taxi data in Shanghai

    Yu Liu;Yu Liu;Fahui Wang;Yu Xiao;Song Gao

  • Quantitative methods and applications in GIS

    Fahui Wang

  • Street Centrality and the Location of Economic Activities in Barcelona

    Sergio Porta;Vito Latora;Fahui Wang;Fahui Wang;Salvador Rueda

  • Geographic Disparities in Accessibility to Food Stores in Southwest Mississippi

    Dajun Dai;Fahui Wang;Fahui Wang

  • Late-Stage Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Health Care Access in Illinois.

    Fahui Wang;Sara McLafferty;Veronica Escamilla;Lan Luo

  • Estimating O–D travel time matrix by Google Maps API: implementation, advantages, and implications

    Fahui Wang;Yanqing Xu

  • Modelling Urban Population Densities in Beijing 1982-90: Suburbanisation and its Causes:

    Fahui Wang;Yixing Zhou

  • Street centrality and land use intensity in Baton Rouge, Louisiana

    Fahui Wang;Anzhelika Antipova;Sergio Porta

  • Modeling Commuting Patterns in Chicago in a GIS Environment: A Job Accessibility Perspective

    Unknown

  • Why public health needs GIS: a methodological overview

    Fahui Wang

  • Urban land uses, socio-demographic attributes and commuting: A multilevel modeling approach

    Anzhelika Antipova;Fahui Wang;Fahui Wang;Chester Wilmot

  • Spatiotemporal evolution of China's railway network in the 20th century: An accessibility approach

    Jiaoe Wang;Jiaoe Wang;Fengjun Jin;Huihui Mo;Fahui Wang

  • Rural reversal? Rural-urban disparities in late-stage cancer risk in Illinois.

    Sara McLafferty;Fahui Wang

  • Location analysis of retail stores in Changchun, China: A street centrality perspective

    Fahui Wang;Fahui Wang;Chen Chen;Chunliang Xiu;Pingyu Zhang

  • Where the Jobs Are: Employment Access and Crime Patterns in Cleveland

    Fahui Wang;W. William Minor

  • Evolution of air transport network of China 1930–2012

    Jiaoe Wang;Huihui Mo;Fahui Wang;Fahui Wang

  • Exploring the network structure and nodal centrality of China

    J E Wang;H H Mo;F H Wang;F J Jin

Frequent Co-Authors

Sara L McLafferty
Sara L McLafferty University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Yu Liu
Yu Liu Peking University
Vito Latora
Vito Latora Queen Mary University of London
Salvatore Scellato
Salvatore Scellato Google (United States)
Mei-Po Kwan
Mei-Po Kwan Chinese University of Hong Kong
Song Gao
Song Gao University of Wisconsin–Madison
Deborah Schrag
Deborah Schrag Harvard University
Ming Wen
Ming Wen University of Hong Kong
David W. S. Wong
David W. S. Wong George Mason University
Laura Liberman
Laura Liberman Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a future in Social Sciences and Humanities, there are several flexible online options to accelerate your career. Pursuing a masters degree online is a popular pathway, enabling students to advance their expertise without pausing their professional or personal life. Many of these programs are designed to fit a variety of schedules and can be completed faster than traditional degrees.

For those beginning their academic journey, an online bachelor's degree can provide a solid foundation in social sciences or humanities, often with accelerated courses so you can graduate sooner.

Social work is another increasingly popular field. Affordable online msw programs affordable make it easier for aspiring social workers to gain specialized training and meet licensure requirements.

Those interested in behavioral analysis can explore bcba certification online cost to learn about budget-friendly online certification options. These programs can lead to impactful roles in education, healthcare, and community services.

With these diverse online learning options, students can customize their educational path toward meaningful careers in the social sciences and humanities fields.

Best Scientists Citing Fahui Wang

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles