World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
54
Citations
13421
World Ranking
4517
National Ranking
16

Jussara M. Almeida publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jussara M. Almeida sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 270 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jussara M. Almeida D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jussara M. Almeida sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jussara M. Almeida is affiliated with the Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais in Brazil. Their research spans the intersection of social sciences and computer science, with significant contributions to sociology and political science, information systems, artificial intelligence, computer networks and communications, and transportation.

The main topics addressed in Almeida's work include:

  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Spam and Phishing Detection
  • Social Media and Politics
  • Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
  • Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Psychological and Educational Research Studies

Among the recent papers authored or co-authored by Almeida are:

  • "Infodemics and health misinformation: a systematic review of reviews," 2022, Bulletin of the World Health Organization
  • "On the cost-effectiveness of neural and non-neural approaches and representations for text classification: A comprehensive comparative study," 2021, Information Processing & Management
  • "A hierarchical network-oriented analysis of user participation in misinformation spread on WhatsApp," 2021, Information Processing & Management
  • "A Dataset of Fact-Checked Images Shared on WhatsApp During the Brazilian and Indian Elections," 2020, Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • "On network backbone extraction for modeling online collective behavior," 2022, PLoS ONE

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Almeida include:

  • Carlos H. G. Ferreira
  • Ana Paula Couto da Silva
  • Fabrício Benevenuto
  • Júlio C. S. Reis
  • Marcos André Gonçalves

Almeida's publications often appear in venues such as:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Information Processing & Management
  • Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • PLoS ONE

Best Publications

  • Summary cache: a scalable wide-area web cache sharing protocol

    Li Fan;Pei Cao;Jussara Almeida;Andrei Z. Broder

  • Using early view patterns to predict the popularity of youtube videos

    Henrique Pinto;Jussara M. Almeida;Marcos A. Gonçalves

  • The tube over time: characterizing popularity growth of youtube videos

    Flavio Figueiredo;Fabrício Benevenuto;Jussara M. Almeida

  • Detecting spammers and content promoters in online video social networks

    Fabrício Benevenuto;Tiago Rodrigues;Virgílio Almeida;Jussara Almeida

  • Analysis of educational media server workloads

    Jussara M. Almeida;Jeffrey Krueger;Derek L. Eager;Mary K. Vernon

  • Identifying user behavior in online social networks

    Marcelo Maia;Jussara Almeida;Virgílio Almeida

  • (Mis)Information Dissemination in WhatsApp: Gathering, Analyzing and Countermeasures

    Gustavo Resende;Philipe Melo;Hugo Sousa;Johnnatan Messias

  • Analyzing client interactivity in streaming media

    Cristiano P. Costa;Italo S. Cunha;Alex Borges;Claudiney V. Ramos

  • Characterizing a spam traffic

    Luiz Henrique Gomes;Cristiano Cazita;Jussara M. Almeida;Virgílio Almeida

  • A Picture of Instagram is Worth More Than a Thousand Words: Workload Characterization and Application

    Thiago H. Silva;Pedro O. S. Vaz de Melo;Jussara M. Almeida;Juliana Salles

  • Identifying video spammers in online social networks

    Fabricio Benevenuto;Tiago Rodrigues;Virgilio Almeida;Jussara Almeida

  • We know where you live: privacy characterization of foursquare behavior

    Tatiana Pontes;Marisa Vasconcelos;Jussara Almeida;Ponnurangam Kumaraguru

  • Joint admission control and resource allocation in virtualized servers

    Jussara Almeida;Virgílio Almeida;Danilo Ardagna;ítalo Cunha

  • Resource Management in the Autonomic Service-Oriented Architecture

    J. Almeida;V. Almeida;D. Ardagna;C. Francalanci

  • Measuring the Behavior of a World-Wide Web Server

    Jussara M. Almeida;Virgilio Almeida;David J. Yates

  • The effects of wide-area conditions on WWW server performance

    Erich M. Nahum;Marcel-Catalin Rosu;Srinivasan Seshan;Jussara Almeida

  • Video interactions in online video social networks

    Fabrício Benevenuto;Tiago Rodrigues;Virgilio Almeida;Jussara Almeida

  • Understanding video interactions in youtube

    Fabricio Benevenuto;Fernando Duarte;Tiago Rodrigues;Virgilio A.F. Almeida

  • Self-Adaptive SLA-Driven Capacity Management for Internet Services

    B. Abrahao;V. Almeida;J. Almeida;A. Zhang

  • Large-scale study of city dynamics and urban social behavior using participatory sensing

    Thiago H. Silva;Pedro O. S. Vaz De Melo;Jussara M. Almeida;Antonio A. F. Loureiro

  • Detecting Spammers and Content Promoters in Online Video Social Networks

    Fabricio Benevenuto;Tiago Rodrigues;Jussara Almeida;Marcos Goncalves

Frequent Co-Authors

Marcos André Gonçalves
Marcos André Gonçalves Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Virgilio Almeida
Virgilio Almeida Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Fabrício Benevenuto
Fabrício Benevenuto Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Antonio A. F. Loureiro
Antonio A. F. Loureiro Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Wagner Meira
Wagner Meira Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Danilo Ardagna
Danilo Ardagna Polytechnic University of Milan
Luís M. A. Bettencourt
Luís M. A. Bettencourt University of Chicago
Marco Mellia
Marco Mellia Polytechnic University of Turin
Edleno Silva de Moura
Edleno Silva de Moura Federal University of Amazonas
Nivio Ziviani
Nivio Ziviani Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education opens diverse opportunities for those interested in Computer Science. Many choose to start with an associate's degree online, a flexible and cost-effective entry point for foundational skills and faster workforce entry.

Those aiming for advanced roles may consider programs ranked among the most useful graduate degrees, including Computer Science master’s and specialized IT concentrations. These in-demand qualifications offer strong career growth and earning potential.

Financial accessibility matters too. Choosing affordable online courses ensures learners can develop new skills without incurring overwhelming debt. Many reputable institutions provide high-quality computer science training at accessible prices.

Admission flexibility is also improving. Today there are many online schools that accept low gpa, making it easier for non-traditional students to start or advance their education. Combined, these pathways make a Computer Science education more accessible than ever before.

Best Scientists Citing Jussara M. Almeida

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles