World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
34
Citations
4697
World Ranking
7600
National Ranking
2556

Peter C. Frederick publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter C. Frederick sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 134 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Peter C. Frederick D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter C. Frederick sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter C. Frederick is affiliated with the University of Florida in the United States. Their research spans the field of Environmental Science, with a focus on various subfields including Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Ecological Modeling, and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics.

Their main research topics include:

  • Avian ecology and behavior
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Mercury impact and mitigation studies
  • Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies
  • Marine and fisheries research
  • Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications

Peter C. Frederick has authored multiple scientific papers in prominent venues. Some recent papers include:

  • "A general deep learning model for bird detection in high-resolution airborne imagery" (2022) published in Ecological Applications
  • "Analysis of movement recursions to detect reproductive events and estimate their fate in central place foragers" (2020) published in Movement Ecology
  • "Mercury bioaccumulation in tropical bats from a region of active artisanal and small-scale gold mining" (2020) published in Ecotoxicology
  • "Quantifying Intertidal Habitat Relative Coverage in a Florida Estuary Using UAS Imagery and GEOBIA" (2020) published in Remote Sensing
  • "Trends in Oyster Populations in the Northeastern Gulf of Mexico: An Assessment of River Discharge and Fishing Effects over Time and Space" (2020) published in Marine and Coastal Fisheries

The scientist has frequently published in venues such as:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Birds of the World
  • Ecotoxicology
  • Marine and Coastal Fisheries

Peter C. Frederick collaborates extensively with several co-authors, including:

  • Lindsey Garner
  • Glenda M. Yenni
  • Ethan P. White
  • S. K. Morgan Ernest
  • Ben Weinstein

Best Publications

  • Altered pairing behaviour and reproductive success in white ibises exposed to environmentally relevant concentrations of methylmercury

    Peter Frederick;Nilmini Jayasena;Nilmini Jayasena

  • Nesting success of five ciconiiform species in relation to water conditions in the Florida Everglades

    Peter C. Frederick;Michael W. Collopy

  • METHYLMERCURY ACCUMULATION IN TISSUES AND ITS EFFECTS ON GROWTH AND APPETITE IN CAPTIVE GREAT EGRETS

    Marilyn G. Spalding;Peter C. Frederick;Heather C. McGill;Shannon N. Bouton

  • The White Ibis and Wood Stork as indicators for restoration of the everglades ecosystem

    Peter Frederick;Dale E. Gawlik;John C. Ogden;Mark I. Cook

  • Restoring the eastern oyster: how much progress has been made in 53 years?

    Ada Bersoza Hernández;Robert D Brumbaugh;Peter Frederick;Raymond Grizzle

  • HISTOLOGIC, NEUROLOGIC, AND IMMUNOLOGIC EFFECTS OF METHYLMERCURY IN CAPTIVE GREAT EGRETS

    Marilyn G. Spalding;Peter C. Frederick;Heather C. McGill;Shannon N. Bouton

  • Effects of chronic, low concentrations of dietary methylmercury on the behavior of juvenile great egrets

    Shannon N. Bouton;Peter C. Frederick;Marilyn G. Spalding;Heather McGill

  • Wading birds as bioindicators of mercury contamination in Florida, USA: Annual and geographic variation

    Peter C. Frederick;Marilyn G. Spalding;Robert Dusek

  • Extrapair Copulations in the Mating System of White Ibis (Eudocimus Albus)

    Peter C. Frederick

  • FRESHWATER WETLANDS, RAINFALL, AND THE BREEDING ECOLOGY OF WHITE IBISES IN COASTAL SOUTH CAROLINA

    Keith L. Bildstein;William Post;James Johnston;Peter Frederick

  • The use of genetic markers to estimate the frequency of successful alternative reproductive tactics

    David F. Westneat;Peter C. Frederick;R. Haven Wiley

  • Accuracy and variation in estimates of large numbers of birds by individual observers using an aerial survey simulator

    Peter C. Frederick;Becky Hylton;Julie A. Heath;Martin Ruane

  • Waterbirds as indicators of ecosystem health in the coastal marine habitats of southern Florida: 1. Selection and justification for a suite of indicator species

    John C. Ogden;John D. Baldwin;Oron L. Bass;Joan A. Browder

  • Decadal changes in oyster reefs in the Big Bend of Florida's Gulf Coast

    J. R. Seavey;W. E. Pine;P. Frederick;L. Sturmer

  • The role of predation in determining reproductive success of colonially nesting wading birds in the Florida Everglades

    Peter C. Frederick;Michael W. Collopy

  • Relationships Among Mercury Concentrations, Hormones, and Nesting Effort of White Ibises (Eudocimus albus) in the Florida Everglades

    Julie A. Heath;Peter C. Frederick

  • Feeding patterns and aggressive behavior in juvenile and adult american flamingos

    Keith L. Bildstein;Peter C. Frederick;Marilyn G. Spalding

  • Subchronic effects of methylmercury on plasma and organ biochemistries in great egret nestlings

    David J. Hoffman;Marilyn G. Spalding;Peter C. Frederick

  • PULSED BREEDING OF LONG-LEGGED WADING BIRDS AND THE IMPORTANCE OF INFREQUENT SEVERE DROUGHT CONDITIONS IN THE FLORIDA EVERGLADES

    Peter C. Frederick;John C. Ogden

  • Exposure of great egret (Ardea albus) nestlings to mercury through diet in the everglades ecosystem

    Peter C Frederick;Marilyn G. Spalding;Maria S. Sepalveda;Gary E. Williams

  • A historical record of mercury contamination in Southern Florida (USA) as inferred from avian feather tissue

    Peter C. Frederick;Becky Hylton;Julie A. Heath;Marilyn G. Spalding

Frequent Co-Authors

Marilyn G. Spalding
Marilyn G. Spalding University of Florida
Keith L. Bildstein
Keith L. Bildstein Hawk Mountain Sanctuary
John C. Ogden
John C. Ogden University of South Florida
Diego Rubolini
Diego Rubolini University of Milan
Joel C. Trexler
Joel C. Trexler Florida International University
William H. Orem
William H. Orem United States Geological Survey
Louis J. Guillette
Louis J. Guillette Medical University of South Carolina
Cynthia C. Gilmour
Cynthia C. Gilmour Smithsonian Environmental Research Center
Alan L. Wright
Alan L. Wright University of Florida
Yuncong Li
Yuncong Li University of Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Ecology and Evolution in the USA opens up a wide range of online degree options and interdisciplinary career paths. Many students look to enhance their scientific background with additional skills by exploring related programs.

For learners interested in environmental design and sustainability, an architect online degree can provide valuable expertise in eco-friendly architecture and urban planning. Similarly, pursuing an online math bachelor's degree strengthens your analytical and quantitative abilities, crucial for ecological modeling and data analysis.

For those with a creative edge, online graphic design schools offer skills in visual communication—essential for conveying scientific ideas to diverse audiences. Alternatively, students seeking flexibility may consider one of the most affordable online interdisciplinary studies programs, allowing them to tailor coursework to specific career goals in areas like conservation, policy, or education.

Exploring these online degrees not only diversifies your knowledge but also increases employability in the evolving fields of ecology, sustainability, and science communication.

Best Scientists Citing Peter C. Frederick

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles