World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
49
Citations
6424
World Ranking
5374
National Ranking
1964

Christopher A. Edwards publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christopher A. Edwards sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 140 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Christopher A. Edwards D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christopher A. Edwards sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Christopher A. Edwards is affiliated with the University of California, Santa Cruz in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Earth and Planetary Sciences, particularly within the domains of Environmental Science and Oceanography.

Edwards's work encompasses several key subfields including:

  • Oceanography
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Physiology
  • Ecology

The main topics addressed in their research include:

  • Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Marine and coastal ecosystems
  • Climate variability and models
  • Marine and fisheries research
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Marine Biology and Ecology Research
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics

Their recent papers highlight work related to marine systems and forecasting. Some notable publications are:

  • "A Dynamically Downscaled Ensemble of Future Projections for the California Current System," 2021, Frontiers in Marine Science
  • "Seasonal-to-interannual prediction of North American coastal marine ecosystems: Forecast methods, mechanisms of predictability, and priority developments," 2020, Progress In Oceanography
  • "Regional and basin scale applications of ensemble adjustment Kalman filter and 4D-Var ocean data assimilation systems," 2020, Progress In Oceanography
  • "The Inner-Shelf Dynamics Experiment," 2020, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • "Dissimilar Sensitivities of Ocean Acidification Metrics to Anthropogenic Carbon Accumulation in the Central North Pacific Ocean and California Current Large Marine Ecosystem," 2022, Geophysical Research Letters

Christopher A. Edwards frequently collaborates with the following researchers:

  • Andrew M. Moore
  • Jérôme Fiechter
  • Jonathan G. Izett
  • Mercedes Pozo Buil
  • Michael G. Jacox

Edwards publishes regularly in several scientific venues, with a concentration in journals related to marine and atmospheric sciences. Their frequent publication outlets include:

  • Frontiers in Marine Science
  • Ocean Modelling
  • Progress In Oceanography
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Deep Sea Research Part II Topical Studies in Oceanography

Best Publications

  • Impacts of the 2015–2016 El Niño on the California Current System: Early assessment and comparison to past events

    Michael G. Jacox;Michael G. Jacox;Elliott L. Hazen;Katherine D. Zaba;Daniel L. Rudnick

  • Coastal Upwelling Revisited: Ekman, Bakun, and Improved Upwelling Indices for the U.S. West Coast

    Michael G. Jacox;Michael G. Jacox;Christopher A. Edwards;Elliott L. Hazen;Steven J. Bograd

  • Individual-based models of copepod populations in coastal upwelling regions: implications of physiologically and environmentally influenced diel vertical migration on demographic success and nearshore retention

    Harold P. Batchelder;Christopher A. Edwards;Thomas M. Powell

  • The Regional Ocean Modeling System (ROMS) 4-dimensional variational data assimilation systems: Part II – Performance and application to the California Current System

    Andrew M. Moore;Hernan G. Arango;Gregoire Broquet;Chris Edwards

  • Regional Ocean Data Assimilation

    Christopher A. Edwards;Andrew M. Moore;Ibrahim Hoteit;Bruce D. Cornuelle

  • Modeling environmental DNA transport in the coastal ocean using Lagrangian particle tracking

    Elizabeth A Andruszkiewicz;Jeffrey R Koseff;Oliver B Fringer;Nicholas T Ouellette

  • Sustainable agricultural systems

    C. Edwards;Rattan Lal;P. Madden;R. Miller

  • ENSO and the California Current coastal upwelling response

    Michael G. Jacox;Jerome Fiechter;Andrew M. Moore;Christopher A. Edwards

  • The Regional Ocean Modeling System (ROMS) 4-dimensional variational data assimilation systems Part III - Observation impact and observation sensitivity in the California Current System

    Andrew M. Moore;Hernan G. Arango;Gregoire Broquet;Chris Edwards

  • Abundance and distribution of major groups of diazotrophic cyanobacteria and their potential contribution to N2 fixation in the tropical Atlantic Ocean

    Nicole L. Goebel;Kendra A. Turk;Katherine M. Achilles;Ryan Paerl

  • Scale of inference: on the sensitivity of habitat models for wide-ranging marine predators to the resolution of environmental data

    Kylie L. Scales;Kylie L. Scales;Elliott L. Hazen;Michael G. Jacox;Michael G. Jacox;Christopher A. Edwards

  • Advancing marine biogeochemical and ecosystem reanalyses and forecasts as tools for monitoring and managing ecosystem health

    Katja Fennel;Marion Gehlen;Pierre Brasseur;Christopher Brown

  • Spatially resolved upwelling in the California Current System and its connections to climate variability

    M. G. Jacox;A. M. Moore;C. A. Edwards;J. Fiechter

  • An historical analysis of the California Current circulation using ROMS 4D-Var: System configuration and diagnostics

    Emilie Neveu;Andrew M. Moore;Christopher A. Edwards;Jérôme Fiechter

  • A central California coastal ocean modeling study: 1. Forward model and the influence of realistic versus climatological forcing

    M. Veneziani;C. A. Edwards;J. D. Doyle;D. Foley

  • Application of 4D-Variational data assimilation to the California Current System

    G. Broquet;C.A. Edwards;A.M. Moore;B.S. Powell

  • A Dynamically Downscaled Ensemble of Future Projections for the California Current System

    Mercedes Pozo Buil;Mercedes Pozo Buil;Michael G. Jacox;Michael G. Jacox;Michael G. Jacox;Jerome Fiechter;Michael A. Alexander

  • Moving Towards Dynamic Ocean Management: How Well Do Modeled Ocean Products Predict Species Distributions?

    Elizabeth A. Becker;Karin A. Forney;Paul C. Fiedler;Jay Barlow

  • Integrating Dynamic Subsurface Habitat Metrics Into Species Distribution Models

    Stephanie Brodie;Stephanie Brodie;Michael G. Jacox;Michael G. Jacox;Michael G. Jacox;Steven J. Bograd;Steven J. Bograd;Heather Welch;Heather Welch

  • Demonstration of a fully-coupled end-to-end model for small pelagic fish using sardine and anchovy in the California Current

    Kenneth A. Rose;Jerome Fiechter;Enrique N. Curchitser;Kate Hedstrom

  • Seasonal-to-interannual prediction of North American coastal marine ecosystems: Forecast methods, mechanisms of predictability, and priority developments

    Michael G. Jacox;Michael G. Jacox;Michael A. Alexander;Samantha Siedlecki;Ke Chen

  • GROWTH AND CARBON CONTENT OF THREE DIFFERENT‐SIZED DIAZOTROPHIC CYANOBACTERIA OBSERVED IN THE SUBTROPICAL NORTH PACIFIC1

    Nicole L. Goebel;Christopher A. Edwards;Brandon J. Carter;Katherine M. Achilles

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew M. Moore
Andrew M. Moore University of California, Santa Cruz
Michael G. Jacox
Michael G. Jacox National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Herman M. Presby
Herman M. Presby Nokia (Finland)
Elliott L. Hazen
Elliott L. Hazen National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Steven J. Bograd
Steven J. Bograd National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Arthur J. Miller
Arthur J. Miller University of California, San Diego
Jonathan P. Zehr
Jonathan P. Zehr University of California, Santa Cruz
Emanuele Di Lorenzo
Emanuele Di Lorenzo Georgia Institute of Technology
James D. Doyle
James D. Doyle United States Naval Research Laboratory
Henry A. Ruhl
Henry A. Ruhl Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can broaden your career opportunities. For example, pursuing a fully funded DSW program is ideal for professionals aiming to combine social work with environmental policy and community health.

If you’re looking for budget-friendly options, a cheap online general studies degree provides a flexible and affordable foundation that can complement specialized environmental courses. This route is especially useful for students wanting a broad understanding before diving deeper into specific fields.

For those seeking an accessible yet meaningful degree, consider some of the easiest bachelor degree programs that still offer valuable insights into environmental topics. These programs can help build essential skills without overwhelming academic demands.

Specialized study in earth sciences is another excellent pathway. A geology degree online offers focused knowledge in subjects like soil, minerals, and earth processes, which are critical in environmental assessments and conservation efforts.

Together, these diverse educational paths can equip students with the tools needed for a variety of careers in environmental research, policy, education, and beyond.

Explore more about these options through the following resources: fully funded dsw programs, cheap online general studies degree, easiest bachelor degree, and geology degree online.

Best Scientists Citing Christopher A. Edwards

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles