World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Albert K. Culbreath

Albert K. Culbreath

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 43 3270 3047 823 735 228 6501

Albert K. Culbreath publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Albert K. Culbreath between 1990 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Albert K. Culbreath published across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025, averaging 6.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2008. 11 of the 237 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2008. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 4 publications 1992: 10 publications 1993: 9 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 8 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 6 publications
1990 2025

237 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Albert K. Culbreath: publications per year, 1990 to 2025
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 4
1992 10
1993 9
1994 4
1995 8
1996 7
1997 3
1998 4
1999 7
2000 3
2001 5
2002 9
2003 4
2004 2
2005 4
2006 6
2007 5
2008 15
2009 6
2010 8
2011 11
2012 6
2013 9
2014 4
2015 8
2016 5
2017 8
2018 11
2019 12
2020 5
2021 15
2022 2
2023 6
2024 5
2025 6
Total 237
Download as CSV

Albert K. Culbreath publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Albert K. Culbreath sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 226–230 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 228 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58 228
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Albert K. Culbreath D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Albert K. Culbreath sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219 43
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Botany
  • Gene
  • Agronomy

His main research concerns Arachis hypogaea, Agronomy, Botany, Cultivar and Tospovirus. The Arachis hypogaea study combines topics in areas such as Quantitative trait locus, Food science and Arachis. His Agronomy study frequently draws connections between related disciplines such as Genetic linkage.

His Botany research incorporates elements of GenBank, Host and Horticulture. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Tomato spotted wilt virus and Resistance. His Tospovirus research includes elements of Pathogenesis-related protein and Nicotiana tabacum.

His most cited work include:

  • Epidemiology and management of tomato spotted wilt in peanut (137 citations)
  • Registration of ‘Tifguard’ Peanut (117 citations)
  • An integrated genetic linkage map of cultivated peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.) constructed from two RIL populations (94 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Albert K. Culbreath mostly deals with Agronomy, Cultivar, Arachis hypogaea, Horticulture and Leaf spot. His work deals with themes such as Plant disease resistance and Tomato spotted wilt virus, which intersect with Agronomy. His research in Cultivar intersects with topics in PEST analysis, Field plot, Seeding and Wilt disease.

His Arachis hypogaea study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Germplasm, Arachis, Tomato spotted wilt tospovirus and Genotype. His study looks at the relationship between Horticulture and topics such as Botany, which overlap with Tospovirus, Host and Pepper. The Leaf spot study combines topics in areas such as Fungicide and Spots.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Agronomy (46.20%)
  • Cultivar (34.78%)
  • Arachis hypogaea (32.61%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?

  • Horticulture (30.98%)
  • Leaf spot (23.91%)
  • Cultivar (34.78%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Albert K. Culbreath mainly investigates Horticulture, Leaf spot, Cultivar, Arachis hypogaea and Fungicide. His work on Pepper as part of general Horticulture research is frequently linked to Tifton and Potato dextrose agar, bridging the gap between disciplines. Leaf spot is a subfield of Botany that Albert K. Culbreath tackles.

The study incorporates disciplines such as Thrips, Genus and Sowing in addition to Cultivar. His Arachis hypogaea research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Quantitative trait locus, Marker-assisted selection, Resistance, Tomato spotted wilt virus and Arachis. The concepts of his Agronomy study are interwoven with issues in PEST analysis and Heteroptera.

Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Mapping Late Leaf Spot Resistance in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) Using QTL-seq Reveals Markers for Marker-Assisted Selection. (42 citations)
  • High-density genetic map using whole-genome resequencing for fine mapping and candidate gene discovery for disease resistance in peanut. (35 citations)
  • Nested‐association mapping (NAM)‐based genetic dissection uncovers candidate genes for seed and pod weights in peanut ( Arachis hypogaea ) (8 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Botany
  • Gene
  • Genetics

Albert K. Culbreath mainly focuses on Genetics, Quantitative trait locus, Arachis hypogaea, Horticulture and Cultivar. Albert K. Culbreath works in the field of Genetics, focusing on Plant disease resistance in particular. His study looks at the relationship between Quantitative trait locus and fields such as Candidate gene, as well as how they intersect with chemical problems.

As part of his studies on Arachis hypogaea, Albert K. Culbreath often connects relevant subjects like Marker-assisted selection. Leaf spot is closely connected to Arachis in his research, which is encompassed under the umbrella topic of Marker-assisted selection. In the field of Horticulture, his study on Fungicide and Thrips overlaps with subjects such as Tifton and Antibiosis.

Best Publications

  • Epidemiology and management of tomato spotted wilt in peanut

    A. K. Culbreath;J. W. Todd;S. L. Brown

  • Registration of ‘Tifguard’ Peanut

    C. Corley Holbrook;Patricia Timper;Albert K. Culbreath;Craig K. Kvien

  • Identification of QTLs associated with oil content and mapping FAD2 genes and their relative contribution to oil quality in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)

    Manish K Pandey;Manish K Pandey;Manish K Pandey;Ming Li Wang;Lixian Qiao;Lixian Qiao;Lixian Qiao;Suping Feng;Suping Feng;Suping Feng

  • An integrated genetic linkage map of cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) constructed from two RIL populations.

    Hongde Qin;Suping Feng;Suping Feng;Charles Chen;Yufang Guo

  • Overwintering hosts and wingform of thrips, Frankliniella spp., in Georgia (Thysanoptera: Thripidae): implications for management of spotted wilt disease.

    J. R. Chamberlin;J. W. Todd;R. J. Beshear;A. K. Culbreath

  • Peanut gene expression profiling in developing seeds at different reproduction stages during Aspergillus parasiticus infection

    Baozhu Guo;Xiaoping Chen;Phat Dang;Brian T Scully;Brian T Scully

  • Biological and molecular analyses of the acibenzolar-S-methyl-induced systemic acquired resistance in flue-cured tobacco against Tomato spotted wilt virus.

    B. Mandal;S. Mandal;A. S. Csinos;N. Martinez

  • Nested‐association mapping (NAM)‐based genetic dissection uncovers candidate genes for seed and pod weights in peanut ( Arachis hypogaea )

    Sunil S. Gangurde;Hui Wang;Hui Wang;Shasidhar Yaduru;Shasidhar Yaduru;Shasidhar Yaduru;Manish K. Pandey

  • Registration of ‘Tifrunner’ Peanut

    C. Corley Holbrook;Albert K. Culbreath

  • Mapping Late Leaf Spot Resistance in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) Using QTL-seq Reveals Markers for Marker-Assisted Selection.

    Josh Clevenger;Ye Chu;Carolina Chavarro;Stephanie Botton

  • High-density genetic map using whole-genome resequencing for fine mapping and candidate gene discovery for disease resistance in peanut.

    Gaurav Agarwal;Gaurav Agarwal;Gaurav Agarwal;Josh Clevenger;Manish K. Pandey;Hui Wang;Hui Wang

  • Genetic Mapping of QTLs Controlling Fatty Acids Provided Insights into the Genetic Control of Fatty Acid Synthesis Pathway in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)

    Ming Li Wang;Pawan Khera;Manish K. Pandey;Hui Wang

  • Field response of new peanut cultivar UF 91108 to tomato spotted wilt virus

    A. K. Culbreath;J. W. Todd;D. W. Gorbet;F. M. Shokes

  • Development of a method of risk assessment to facilitate integrated management of spotted wilt of peanut

    Steve L. Brown;Albert K. Culbreath;James W. Todd;Dan W. Gorbet

  • Toxicity of endophyte-infected tall fescue alkaloids and grass metabolites on Pratylenchus scribneri.

    Ada A Bacetty;Maurice E Snook;Anthony E Glenn;James P Noe

  • Epidemiology of spotted wilt disease of peanut caused by Tomato spotted wilt virus in the southeastern U.S.

    Albert K Culbreath;R Srinivasan

  • Fungicide dissipation and impact on metolachlor aerobic soil degradation and soil microbial dynamics

    Paul M. White;Thomas L. Potter;Albert K. Culbreath

  • Direct and indirect effects of a thrips‐transmitted Tospovirus on the preference and fitness of its vector, Frankliniella fusca

    Anita Shrestha;Rajagopalbabu Srinivasan;David G. Riley;Albert K. Culbreath

  • DYNAMICS OF VECTOR POPULATIONS AND PROGRESS OF SPOTTED WILT DISEASE RELATIVE TO INSECTICIDE USE IN PEANUTS

    J.W. Todd;A.K. Culbreath;S.L. Brown

  • Factors Affecting Mechanical Transmission of Tomato spotted wilt virus to Peanut (Arachis hypogaea)

    B Mandal;H R Pappu;A K Culbreath

  • Genetic mapping and quantitative trait loci analysis for disease resistance using F 2 and F 5 Generation‐based genetic maps derived from ‘Tifrunner’ × ‘GT‐C20’ in peanut

    Hui Wang;Manish K. Pandey;Manish K. Pandey;Lixian Qiao;Lixian Qiao;Hongde Qin

Frequent Co-Authors

C. Corley Holbrook
C. Corley Holbrook Agricultural Research Service
Robert C. Kemerait
Robert C. Kemerait University of Georgia
Baozhu Guo
Baozhu Guo Agricultural Research Service
Manish K. Pandey
Manish K. Pandey International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics
Rajeev K. Varshney
Rajeev K. Varshney Murdoch University
Peggy Ozias-Akins
Peggy Ozias-Akins University of Georgia
Ye Chu
Ye Chu University of Georgia
Ming Li Wang
Ming Li Wang Agricultural Research Service
Gerrit Hoogenboom
Gerrit Hoogenboom University of Florida
Xin Liu
Xin Liu Chinese Academy of Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Albert K. Culbreath

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles