World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 61 1160 1066 314 274 319 11945

George G. Kennedy publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by George G. Kennedy between 1971 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. George G. Kennedy published across 55 years, from 1971 to 2025, averaging 6 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2000. 7 of the 328 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1971 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2000. 1971: 1 publication 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 3 publications 1975: 5 publications 1976: 8 publications 1977: 2 publications 1978: 7 publications 1979: 5 publications 1980: 7 publications 1981: 4 publications 1982: 6 publications 1983: 6 publications 1984: 6 publications 1985: 10 publications 1986: 7 publications 1987: 9 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 8 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 10 publications 1992: 8 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 8 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 12 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 12 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 5 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 6 publications
1971 2025

328 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
George G. Kennedy: publications per year, 1971 to 2025
Year Publications
1971 1
1972 0
1973 0
1974 3
1975 5
1976 8
1977 2
1978 7
1979 5
1980 7
1981 4
1982 6
1983 6
1984 6
1985 10
1986 7
1987 9
1988 5
1989 8
1990 2
1991 10
1992 8
1993 6
1994 1
1995 8
1996 9
1997 9
1998 6
1999 2
2000 12
2001 9
2002 5
2003 11
2004 8
2005 12
2006 5
2007 5
2008 9
2009 6
2010 3
2011 4
2012 5
2013 6
2014 1
2015 5
2016 8
2017 3
2018 11
2019 3
2020 9
2021 5
2022 11
2023 5
2024 1
2025 6
Total 328
Download as CSV

George G. Kennedy publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George G. Kennedy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 316–320 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 319 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29 319
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

George G. Kennedy D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George G. Kennedy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59 61
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Ecology
  • Botany
  • Insect

George G. Kennedy mainly investigates Botany, Ecology, PEST analysis, Horticulture and Resistance. Trichome, Thrips, Thripidae, Lycopersicon and Lepidoptera genitalia are among the areas of Botany where the researcher is concentrating his efforts. He works mostly in the field of Lycopersicon, limiting it down to topics relating to Manduca sexta and, in certain cases, Wild tomato and Colorado potato beetle, as a part of the same area of interest.

His Ecology research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Genetic variability and Biological dispersal. His studies in PEST analysis integrate themes in fields like Genetics, Host, Harmonia axyridis, Coccinellidae and Biotechnology. His work on Gelechiidae and Melon as part of general Horticulture study is frequently connected to Stylet and Active component, therefore bridging the gap between diverse disciplines of science and establishing a new relationship between them.

His most cited work include:

  • Tomato, Pests, Parasitoids, and Predators: Tritrophic Interactions Involving the Genus Lycopersicon (266 citations)
  • Integration of Insect-Resistant Genetically Modified Crops within IPM Programs (227 citations)
  • 2-Tridecanone: A Naturally Occurring Insecticide from the Wild Tomato Lycopersicon hirsutum f.glabratum (216 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Botany, Agronomy, Horticulture, PEST analysis and Thrips. Botany is represented through his Leptinotarsa, Larva, Lycopersicon, Lepidoptera genitalia and Trichome research. His study in Agronomy is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Overwintering and European corn borer.

The concepts of his Horticulture study are interwoven with issues in Plant virus, Imidacloprid and Sex pheromone. In general PEST analysis study, his work on Colorado potato beetle often relates to the realm of Bacillus thuringiensis, thereby connecting several areas of interest. George G. Kennedy interconnects Host and Frankliniella tritici in the investigation of issues within Thrips.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Botany (40.56%)
  • Agronomy (28.51%)
  • Horticulture (27.71%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2015-2020)?

  • Thrips (18.07%)
  • Neonicotinoid (4.82%)
  • Horticulture (27.71%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of investigation include Thrips, Neonicotinoid, Horticulture, Imidacloprid and Agronomy. The Thrips study combines topics in areas such as PEST analysis, Host and Crop. His work deals with themes such as Pesticide, Herbivore and Intensive farming, which intersect with PEST analysis.

His work carried out in the field of Neonicotinoid brings together such families of science as Gossypium, Larva and Seedling. His research integrates issues of Toxicology and Resistance in his study of Imidacloprid. His Trichome research entails a greater understanding of Botany.

Between 2015 and 2020, his most popular works were:

  • Frankliniella fusca resistance to neonicotinoid insecticides: an emerging challenge for cotton pest management in the eastern United States. (44 citations)
  • Differential and Synergistic Functionality of Acylsugars in Suppressing Oviposition by Insect Herbivores. (32 citations)
  • Insecticide Resistance Signals Negative Consequences of Widespread Neonicotinoid Use on Multiple Field Crops in the U.S. Cotton Belt. (16 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Ecology
  • Botany
  • Insect

George G. Kennedy focuses on Thrips, Neonicotinoid, Agronomy, Imidacloprid and Thiamethoxam. His Thrips study incorporates themes from PEST analysis, Crop and Gossypium. His research in PEST analysis intersects with topics in Intensive farming, Canopy, Herbivore, Pesticide and Frankliniella tritici.

His Gossypium research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Integrated pest management and Resistance. His studies examine the connections between Imidacloprid and genetics, as well as such issues in Toxicology, with regards to Cyantraniliprole and Bifenthrin. The various areas that George G. Kennedy examines in his Acylsugar study include Whitefly, Exudate, Botany, Plant breeding and Bioassay.

Best Publications

  • Tomato, Pests, Parasitoids, and Predators: Tritrophic Interactions Involving the Genus Lycopersicon

    George G. Kennedy

  • 2-Tridecanone: A Naturally Occurring Insecticide from the Wild Tomato Lycopersicon hirsutum f.glabratum

    W. G. Williams;George G. Kennedy;Robert T. Yamamoto;J. D. Thacker

  • Quantifying food consumption and growth in insects

    Robert R. Farrar;James D. Barbour;George G. Kennedy

  • Life systems of polyphagous arthropod pests in temporally unstable cropping systems.

    George G. Kennedy;Nicholas P. Storer

  • Integration of Insect-Resistant Genetically Modified Crops within IPM Programs

    George G. Kennedy

  • Effects of natural enemies on the rate of herbivore adaptation to resistant host plants

    F. Gould;G.G. Kennedy;M.T. Johnson

  • Methomyl Induced Outbreak of Liriomyza sativaeon Tomato

    E. R. Oatman;G. G. Kennedy

  • The Role of Weed Hosts and Tobacco Thrips, Frankliniella fusca, in the Epidemiology of Tomato spotted wilt virus.

    R. L. Groves;J. F. Walgenbach;J. W. Moyer;G. G. Kennedy

  • Ecological, agricultural, genetic, and commercial considerations in the deployment of insect-resistant germplasm

    George G. Kennedy;Fred Gould;O. M. B. Deponti;R. E. Stinner

  • Viral genetic determinants for thrips transmission of Tomato spotted wilt virus

    Sang-Hoon Sin;Brian C. McNulty;George G. Kennedy;James W. Moyer

  • Resistance variation in natural and managed systems.

    G. G. Kennedy;J. D. Barbour;R. S. Fritz;E. L. Simms

  • GENETIC VARIATION IN PLANT-INSECT ASSOCIATIONS: SURVIVAL OF LEPTINOTARSA DECEMLINEATA POPULATIONS ON SOLANUM CAROLINENSE.

    J. Daniel Hare;George G. Kennedy

  • THE ROLE OF GLANDULAR TRICHOMES IN THE RESISTANCE OF LYCOPERSICON HIRSUTUM F. GLABRATUM TO HELIOTHIS ZEA

    Michael B. Dimock;George G. Kennedy

  • Spatial Processes in the Evolution of Resistance in Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to Bt Transgenic Corn and Cotton in a Mixed Agroecosystem: a Biology-rich Stochastic Simulation Model

    Nicholas P. Storer;Steven L. Peck;Fred Gould;John W. Van Duyn

  • Life history traits of Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on non-Bt and Bt transgenic corn hybrids in eastern North Carolina

    Nicholas P. Storer;John W. Van Duyn;George G. Kennedy

  • Ecological and agricultural considerations in the management of twospotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae Koch).

    Brandenburg Rl;Kennedy Gg

  • INTERCROP RELATIONSHIPS AND SPIDER MITE DISPERSAL IN A CORN/PEANUT AGRO‐ECOSYSTEM

    R. L. Brandenburg;G. G. Kennedy

  • Overwintering of Frankliniella fusca (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on Winter Annual Weeds Infected with Tomato spotted wilt virus and Patterns of Virus Movement Between Susceptible Weed Hosts.

    R. L. Groves;J. F. Walgenbach;J. W. Moyer;G. G. Kennedy

  • Role of Glandular Trichomes in the Resistance of Lycopersicon hirsutum f. glabratum to Colorado Potato Beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)

    G. G. Kennedy;C. F. Sorenson

  • Photo-oriented aerial-dispersal behavior of Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) enhances escape from the leaf surface

    D. R. Smitley;G. G. Kennedy

  • Relationship Between Trichome Density in Tomato and Parasitism of Heliothis spp. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Eggs by Trichogramma spp. (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae)

    William C. Kauffman;George G. Kennedy

  • Effects of Production Practices on Soil-Borne Entomopathogens in Western North Carolina Vegetable Systems

    Robert L. Hummel;James F. Walgenbach;Mary E. Barbercheck;George G. Kennedy

  • Movement of the twospotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae, among hosts in a corn‐peanut agroecosystem

    David C. Margolies;George G. Kennedy

Frequent Co-Authors

Fred Gould
Fred Gould North Carolina State University
Brian A. Nault
Brian A. Nault Cornell University
Katja Poveda
Katja Poveda Cornell University
Coby Schal
Coby Schal North Carolina State University
Edward L. Vargo
Edward L. Vargo Texas A&M University
Martha A. Mutschler
Martha A. Mutschler Cornell University
David L. Jordan
David L. Jordan North Carolina State University
Graham P. Head
Graham P. Head Bayer (United States)
G. Craig Yencho
G. Craig Yencho North Carolina State University
Linda Hanley-Bowdoin
Linda Hanley-Bowdoin North Carolina State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing George G. Kennedy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles