World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Richard L. Hellmich

Richard L. Hellmich

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
50
Citations
11078
World Ranking
17519
National Ranking
7194

Richard L. Hellmich publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard L. Hellmich sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 207 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Richard L. Hellmich D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard L. Hellmich sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard L. Hellmich is affiliated with Iowa State University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with particular attention to Insect Science, Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology, and Nature and Landscape Conservation.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Insect and Pesticide Research
  • Plant and animal studies
  • Insect Resistance and Genetics
  • Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
  • Insect Pest Control Strategies
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change

Richard L. Hellmich has published several papers on monarch butterfly biology and pesticide effects, including:

  • "Assessing Field-Scale Risks of Foliar Insecticide Applications to Monarch Butterfly (Danaus plexippus) Larvae," 2020, Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
  • "Monarch Butterfly (Danaus plexippus) Life-Stage Risks from Foliar and Seed-Treatment Insecticides," 2021, Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
  • "Estimating arthropod survival probability from field counts: a case study with monarch butterflies," 2020, Ecosphere
  • "Estimates of common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca) utilization by monarch larvae (Danaus plexippus) and the significance of larval movement," 2020, Journal of Insect Conservation
  • "Monarch Butterfly Ecology, Behavior, and Vulnerabilities in North Central United States Agricultural Landscapes," 2022, BioScience

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Richard L. Hellmich include:

  • Steven P. Bradbury
  • Niranjana Krishnan
  • Joel R. Coats
  • Keith G. Bidne
  • Yang Zhang

Their publications have appeared in journals such as:

  • Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
  • Ecosphere
  • Plant Direct
  • Journal of Stored Products Research
  • Journal of Insect Conservation

Best Publications

  • Areawide Suppression of European Corn Borer with Bt Maize Reaps Savings to Non-Bt Maize Growers

    W. D. Hutchison;E. C. Burkness;P. D. Mitchell;R. D. Moon

  • Impact of Bt corn pollen on monarch butterfly populations: A risk assessment

    Mark K. Sears;Richard L. Hellmich;Diane E. Stanley-Horn;Karen S. Oberhauser

  • Assessment of risk of insect-resistant transgenic crops to nontarget arthropods

    Jörg Romeis;Detlef Bartsch;Franz Bigler;Marco P Candolfi

  • Comparison of Fumonisin Concentrations in Kernels of Transgenic Bt Maize Hybrids and Nontransgenic Hybrids.

    Gary P. Munkvold;Richard L. Hellmich;Larry G. Rice

  • Monarch larvae sensitivity to Bacillus thuringiensis- purified proteins and pollen

    Richard L. Hellmich;Blair D. Siegfried;Mark K. Sears;Diane E. Stanley-Horn

  • Reduced fusarium ear rot and symptomless infection in kernels of maize genetically engineered for European corn borer resistance.

    Gary P. Munkvold;Richard L. Hellmich;W. B. Showers

  • Corn pollen deposition on milkweeds in and near cornfields

    John M. Pleasants;Richard L. Hellmich;Galen P. Dively;Mark K. Sears

  • Recommendations for the design of laboratory studies on non-target arthropods for risk assessment of genetically engineered plants

    Jörg Romeis;Richard L. Hellmich;Marco P. Candolfi;Keri Carstens

  • Climate change impacts on mycotoxin risks in US maize

    F. Wu;D. Bhatnagar;T. Bui-Klimke;I. Carbone

  • Effects on Monarch Butterfly Larvae (Lepidoptera: Danaidae) After Continuous Exposure to Cry1Ab-Expressing Corn During Anthesis

    Galen P. Dively;Robyn Rose;Mark K. Sears;Richard L. Hellmich

  • Partial mitochondrial genome sequences of Ostrinia nubilalis and Ostrinia furnicalis.

    Brad S. Coates;Douglas V. Sumerford;Richard L. Hellmich;Leslie C. Lewis

  • Frequency of Resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis Toxin Cry1Ab in an Iowa Population of European Corn Borer (Lepidoptera: Crambidae)

    D. A. Andow;D. M. Olson;D. M. Olson;Richard L. Hellmich;D. N. Alstad

  • Seeds of Change: Corn Seed Mixtures for Resistance Management and Integrated Pest Management

    David W. Onstad;Paul D. Mitchell;Terrance M. Hurley;Jonathan G. Lundgren

  • Selection for high and low pollenhoarding honey bees

    Richard L. Hellmich;Jovan M. Kulincevic;Walter C. Rothenbuhler

  • Deriving criteria to select arthropod species for laboratory tests to assess the ecological risks from cultivating arthropod-resistant genetically engineered crops.

    Joerg Romeis;Alan Raybould;Franz Bigler;Marco P. Candolfi

  • Effects of Living Mulches on Predator Abundance and Sentinel Prey in a Corn–Soybean–Forage Rotation

    Jarrad R Prasifka;Nicholas P. Schmidt;Keith A Kohler;Matthew E. O'Neal

  • Male reproductive parasitism: a factor in the africanization of European honey-bee populations

    Thomas E. Rinderer;Richard L. Hellmich;Robert G. Danka;Anita M. Collins

  • Aggregation and Dispersal Behavior of Marked and Released European Corn Borer (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) Adults

    William B. Showers;Richard L. Hellmich;M. Ellison Derrick-Robinson;M. Ellison Derrick-Robinson;William H. Hendrix

  • Early Detection and Mitigation of Resistance to Bt Maize by Western Corn Rootworm (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)

    David A. Andow;Steven G. Pueppke;Arthur W. Schaafsma;Aaron J. Gassmann

  • Understanding successful resistance management: the European corn borer and Bt corn in the United States.

    Blair D. Siegfried;Richard L. Hellmich

Frequent Co-Authors

Blair D. Siegfried
Blair D. Siegfried Pennsylvania State University
Jörg Romeis
Jörg Romeis University of Bern
Gary P. Munkvold
Gary P. Munkvold Iowa State University
Diane M. Debinski
Diane M. Debinski Montana State University
Galen P. Dively
Galen P. Dively University of Maryland, College Park
Bruce A. Babcock
Bruce A. Babcock University of California, Riverside
Larry L. Murdock
Larry L. Murdock Purdue University West Lafayette
Angharad M. R. Gatehouse
Angharad M. R. Gatehouse Newcastle University
Xuguo Zhou
Xuguo Zhou University of Kentucky
Richard T. Roush
Richard T. Roush Pennsylvania State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry opens doors to a variety of rewarding career paths in healthcare, research, and wellness. Many students are now turning to flexible learning formats, such as the accelerated biology degree, which allows you to earn your qualification faster and join the workforce sooner.

If you are interested in direct patient care, consider pursuing an online asn. This pathway prepares you for essential nursing roles and provides solid job prospects in hospitals, clinics, and community health settings.

Nutrition is another growing field closely linked to biology. The best online nutrition programs equip graduates with the expertise needed to advise individuals and communities on healthy living through diet and lifestyle.

For those interested in management roles within healthcare or research organizations, top cahme-accredited mha programs offer specialized training in healthcare administration, preparing you for leadership and decision-making positions.

Best Scientists Citing Richard L. Hellmich

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles