World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
39
Citations
4768
World Ranking
8455
National Ranking
3013

David Fee publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Fee sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 186 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

David Fee D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Fee sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

David Fee is affiliated with the University of Alaska Fairbanks in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Earth and Planetary Sciences with substantial contributions also in Computer Science. Within these broader fields, their work spans several subfields including Geophysics, Artificial Intelligence, Atmospheric Science, Ocean Engineering, and interdisciplinary areas involving Management, Monitoring, Policy, and Law.

The scientist's research topics notably emphasize Seismic Waves and Analysis, Seismology and Earthquake Studies, Earthquake Detection and Analysis, earthquake and tectonic studies, Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques, Landslides and related hazards, as well as Geophysical Methods and Applications.

David Fee has published in multiple frequent venues which highlight the focus and impact of their work. These venues include:

  • Bulletin of Volcanology
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
  • Seismological Research Letters
  • Frontiers in Earth Science
  • Geophysical Journal International

They have collaborated extensively with several frequent coauthors. These include:

  • J. J. Lyons (23 publications)
  • M. M. Haney (21 publications)
  • Robin S. Matoza (18 publications)
  • Alexandra M. Iezzi (15 publications)
  • A. Wech (10 publications)

Among their recent notable publications are:

  • Atmospheric waves and global seismoacoustic observations of the January 2022 Hunga eruption, Tonga (2022), published in Science
  • Did ice-charging generate volcanic lightning during the 2016-2017 eruption of Bogoslof volcano, Alaska? (2020), published in Bulletin of Volcanology
  • Reconstruction of the 2018 tsunamigenic flank collapse and eruptive activity at Anak Krakatau based on eyewitness reports, seismo-acoustic and satellite observations (2020), published in Earth and Planetary Science Letters
  • Local Explosion Detection and Infrasound Localization by Reverse Time Migration Using 3-D Finite-Difference Wave Propagation (2021), published in Frontiers in Earth Science
  • Infrasound generated by the 2016-2017 shallow submarine eruption of Bogoslof volcano, Alaska (2020), published in Bulletin of Volcanology

Best Publications

  • Atmospheric waves and global seismoacoustic observations of the January 2022 Hunga eruption, Tonga

    Unknown

  • An overview of volcano infrasound: From hawaiian to plinian, local to global

    David Fee;Robin S. Matoza

  • Infrasound from Tungurahua Volcano 2006–2008: Strombolian to Plinian eruptive activity

    David Fee;Milton Garces;Andrea Steffke

  • Infrasonic jet noise from volcanic eruptions

    R. S. Matoza;D. Fee;M. A. Garcés;J. M. Seiner

  • Infrasonic harmonic tremor and degassing bursts from Halema'uma'u Crater, Kilauea Volcano, Hawaii

    David Fee;David Fee;Milton Garcés;Matt Patrick;Bernard Chouet

  • Acoustic source inversion to estimate volume flux from volcanic explosions

    Keehoon Kim;Keehoon Kim;David Fee;Akihiko Yokoo;Jonathan M. Lees

  • Overview of the 2009 and 2011 Sayarim Infrasound Calibration Experiments

    David Fee;Roger Waxler;Jelle Assink;Yefim Gitterman

  • Detecting hidden volcanic explosions from Mt. Cleveland Volcano, Alaska with infrasound and ground-coupled airwaves

    Silvio De Angelis;David Fee;Matthew Haney;David Schneider

  • Infrasonic tremor in the diffraction zone

    David Fee;Milton Garcés

  • Volcanic tremor and plume height hysteresis from Pavlof Volcano, Alaska

    David Fee;Matthew M. Haney;Robin S. Matoza;Alexa R. Van Eaton

  • Mantle transition zone topography and structure beneath the Yellowstone hotspot

    David Fee;Ken Dueker

  • Characterization of the 2008 Kasatochi and Okmok eruptions using remote infrasound arrays

    David Fee;David Fee;Andrea Steffke;Milton Garces

  • First recorded eruption of Nabro volcano, Eritrea, 2011

    Berhe Goitom;Clive Oppenheimer;James O S Hammond;Raphaël Grandin

  • Aeroacoustics of volcanic jets: Acoustic power estimation and jet velocity dependence

    Robin S. Matoza;David Fee;Tracianne B. Neilsen;Kent L. Gee

  • Evaluation of Redoubt Volcano's sulfur dioxide emissions by the Ozone Monitoring Instrument

    Taryn Lopez;Simon A. Carn;Cynthia A. Werner;David Fee

  • Capturing the Acoustic Fingerprint of Stratospheric Ash Injection

    Milton Garcés;David Fee;Andrea Steffke;David McCormack

  • Shallow degassing events as a trigger for very-long-period seismicity at Kīlauea Volcano, Hawai‘i

    Matthew Patrick;David Wilson;David Fee;Tim R. Orr

  • Volcano Infrasound and the International Monitoring System

    Robin Matoza;David Fee;David Green;Pierrick Mialle

  • Eruption chronologies, plume heights and eruption styles at Tungurahua Volcano: Integrating remote sensing techniques and infrasound

    Andrea M. Steffke;David Fee;Milton Garces;Andrew Harris

  • Infrasonic tremor wavefield of the Pu`u `Ō`ō crater complex and lava tube system, Hawaii, in April 2007

    Robin S. Matoza;David Fee;David Fee;Milton A. Garcés

  • Eruption mass estimation using infrasound waveform inversion and ash and gas measurements: Evaluation at Sakurajima Volcano, Japan

    David Fee;Pavel Izbekov;Keehoon Kim;Akihiko Yokoo

  • Seismic and Infrasonic Monitoring

    Stephen R. McNutt;Glenn Thompson;Jeffrey Johnson;Silvio De Angelis

Frequent Co-Authors

Robin S. Matoza
Robin S. Matoza University of California, Santa Barbara
Matthew M. Haney
Matthew M. Haney Alaska Volcano Observatory
Milton Garces
Milton Garces University of Hawaii at Manoa
Jeffrey B. Johnson
Jeffrey B. Johnson Boise State University
Michael A. H. Hedlin
Michael A. H. Hedlin University of California, San Diego
Matthew R. Patrick
Matthew R. Patrick United States Geological Survey
Simon Carn
Simon Carn Michigan Technological University
Stephen R. McNutt
Stephen R. McNutt University of South Florida
Ben Kennedy
Ben Kennedy University of Canterbury
Mark A. Merrifield
Mark A. Merrifield University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences often leads students to consider complementary fields that enhance their understanding of societal and policy impacts. For those interested in public administration, pursuing one of the best online MPA programs can provide valuable skills in environmental policy and management.

Additionally, understanding human behaviors and social dynamics is crucial for addressing environmental challenges. An online sociology bachelor degree online can complement an environmental science background by offering insights into community interactions and cultural factors that affect environmental outcomes.

For professionals aiming to further their academic credentials, numerous options exist beyond traditional doctoral programs. Online edd without dissertation programs provide a streamlined path for educators and leaders to deepen their expertise without the extended commitment of a dissertation.

Moreover, those holding an Educational Specialist degree may find value in programs designed to bridge to a Doctor of Education. The eds to edd bridge program is an effective route for advancing academic qualifications and enhancing career opportunities in educational leadership roles related to environmental education and policy.

Best Scientists Citing David Fee

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles