World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
58
Citations
15594
World Ranking
13000
National Ranking
5542

Richard T. Roush publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard T. Roush sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 145 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Richard T. Roush D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard T. Roush sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard T. Roush is affiliated with Pennsylvania State University in the United States. Their research is primarily situated within the Agricultural and Biological Sciences, focusing on multiple interconnected subfields including Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, and Emergency Medical Services.

The scientist's recent scholarly contributions reflect a focus on insect behavior, pest control methods, and related ecological interactions. Some of the key topics in their work include:

  • Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control
  • Insect behavior and control techniques
  • Hemiptera Insect Studies
  • Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
  • Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
  • Insects and Parasite Interactions
  • Disaster Response and Management

Roush has contributed to several publications, notably in peer-reviewed journals focusing on entomology and public health. The frequent venues for their publications include:

  • Environmental Entomology
  • Journal of Economic Entomology
  • Health Security

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Roush are:

  • "Applications of Beauveria bassiana (Hypocreales: Cordycipitaceae) to Control Populations of Spotted Lanternfly (Hemiptera: Fulgoridae), in Semi-Natural Landscapes and on Grapevines," 2020, Environmental Entomology
  • "Spotted Lanternfly (Hemiptera: Fulgoridae) Nymphal Dispersion Patterns and Their Influence on Field Experiments," 2021, Environmental Entomology
  • "Efficacy and nontarget effects of broadcast treatments to manage spotted lanternfly (Hemiptera: Fulgoridae) nymphs," 2023, Journal of Economic Entomology
  • "County-Level Planning for Efficient Distribution of Emergency Medical Countermeasures with RealOpt Software," 2021, Health Security

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Roush include:

  • John Rost
  • David J. Biddinger
  • Nina E. Jenkins
  • D. D. Calvin
  • Joseph A. Keller

The scope of Roush's work encompasses both fundamental research in insect science and applied studies involving pest control, especially relating to the spotted lanternfly. Their work also intersects with public health and disaster response, as indicated by contributions addressing emergency medical countermeasure distribution strategies.

Best Publications

  • Ecological Genetics of Insecticide and Acaricide Resistance

    Richard T. Roush;John A. McKenzie

  • Economic, ecological, food safety, and social consequences of the deployment of bt transgenic plants.

    A. M. Shelton;J.-Z. Zhao;R. T. Roush

  • Insect resistance management in GM crops: past, present and future

    Sarah L. Bates;Jian Zhou Zhao;Richard T. Roush;Anthony M. Shelton

  • Insect Resistance to Transgenic Bt Crops: Lessons From the Laboratory and Field

    Bruce E. Tabashnik;Yves Carrière;Timothy J. Dennehy;Shai Morin

  • Pesticide resistance in arthropods.

    Richard Tyrone Roush;Bruce E. Tabashnik

  • The Role of Population Genetics in Resistance Research and Management

    Richard T. Roush;Joanne C. Daly

  • Transgenic plants expressing two Bacillus thuringiensis toxins delay insect resistance evolution

    Jian Zhou Zhao;Jun Cao;Yaxin Li;Hilda L. Collins

  • Two-toxin strategies for management of insecticidal transgenic crops: can pyramiding succeed where pesticide mixtures have not?

    R. T. Roush

  • Pollen-mediated movement of herbicide resistance between commercial canola fields

    Mary A. Rieger;Michael Lamond;Christopher Preston;Stephen B. Powles

  • Considerations for design of insecticide resistance monitoring programs

    R. T. Roush;G. L. Miller

  • Management of Genetics of Biological-Control Introductions

    K. R. Hopper;R. T. Roush;W. Powell

  • Mate finding, dispersal, number released, and the success of biological control introductions

    Keith R. Hopper;Richard T. Roush

  • Designing resistance management programs: how can you choose?

    Richard T. Roush

  • Field tests on managing resistance to Bt-engineered plants.

    Anthony M. Shelton;Juliet D. Tang;Juliet D. Tang;Richard T. Roush;Timothy D. Metz;Timothy D. Metz

  • Molecular cloning and transformation of cyclodiene resistance in Drosophila: an invertebrate gamma-aminobutyric acid subtype A receptor locus.

    Richard H. ffrench-Constant;D P Mortlock;C D Shaffer;R J MacIntyre

  • The reconstruction and expression of a Bacillus thuringiensis cryIIIA gene in protoplasts and potato plants

    Michael J. Adang;Margaret S. Brody;Guy Cardineau;Nancy Eagan

  • Concurrent use of transgenic plants expressing a single and two Bacillus thuringiensis genes speeds insect adaptation to pyramided plants

    Jian Zhou Zhao;Jun Cao;Hilda L. Collins;Sarah L. Bates

  • Resistance Detection and Documentation: The Relative Roles of Pesticidal and Biochemical Assays

    Richard H. ffrench-Constant;Richard T. Roush

  • Managing pests and their resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis: Can transgenic crops be better than sprays?

    Richard T. Roush

  • Bt‐transgenic crops: just another pretty insecticide or a chance for a new start in resistance management?

    Richard T. Roush

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard H. ffrench-Constant
Richard H. ffrench-Constant University of Exeter
Elizabeth D. Earle
Elizabeth D. Earle Cornell University
KJ Evans
KJ Evans University of Tasmania
Bruce E. Tabashnik
Bruce E. Tabashnik University of Arizona
Richard L. Hellmich
Richard L. Hellmich Iowa State University
Ward M. Tingey
Ward M. Tingey Cornell University
Galen P. Dively
Galen P. Dively University of Maryland, College Park
Christopher Preston
Christopher Preston University of Adelaide
Jörg Romeis
Jörg Romeis University of Bern
Stephen B. Powles
Stephen B. Powles University of Western Australia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

A background in Biology or Biochemistry opens doors to diverse online degrees and lucrative career pathways in the health sector. Among these, medical coding and health information management stand out due to growing healthcare demands and flexible work options.

Those interested in coding careers often explore the differences between cpc vs ccs certifications. Understanding their unique requirements and career outcomes is crucial for making the best choice as each impacts job prospects and earning potential differently.

If you’re curious about salaries, see how much do medical coders make to get a realistic view of compensation in this field. Demand remains strong: explore is medical billing and coding in demand for an in-depth look at employment trends, advantages, and challenges of these roles.

For students considering degree paths, check the health information management degree options. Affordable online programs provide a direct route into data-driven healthcare careers that blend science knowledge and technical skills.

Best Scientists Citing Richard T. Roush

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles