What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
His primary areas of investigation include Acetylcholine receptor, Nicotinic agonist, Genetics, Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor and Receptor.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Endocrinology, Acetylcholine and Cholinergic in addition to Acetylcholine receptor.
His Nicotinic agonist study combines topics in areas such as Neonicotinoid and Imidacloprid.
His study in Imidacloprid is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Agonist, Biochemistry and Stereochemistry.
The Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor study which covers G alpha subunit that intersects with Molecular biology.
His Receptor study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Endoplasmic reticulum and Pharmacology.
His most cited work include:
- Insights into social insects from the genome of the honeybee Apis mellifera (1472 citations)
- The genome of the model beetle and pest Tribolium castaneum. (1039 citations)
- Genome Sequence of the Pea Aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum (1033 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His scientific interests lie mostly in Acetylcholine receptor, Nicotinic agonist, Receptor, Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor and Biochemistry.
The concepts of his Acetylcholine receptor study are interwoven with issues in Biophysics and Endocrinology, Acetylcholine, Cholinergic.
His work investigates the relationship between Nicotinic agonist and topics such as Pharmacology that intersect with problems in Fipronil.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Molecular biology and Cell biology.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Xenopus, Gene and Ion channel in addition to Cell biology.
His Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor study introduces a deeper knowledge of Genetics.
He most often published in these fields:
- Acetylcholine receptor (29.81%)
- Nicotinic agonist (27.88%)
- Receptor (24.04%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2006-2020)?
- Nicotinic agonist (27.88%)
- Acetylcholine receptor (29.81%)
- Genetics (16.35%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
David B. Sattelle mostly deals with Nicotinic agonist, Acetylcholine receptor, Genetics, Caenorhabditis elegans and Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor.
As part of one scientific family, David B. Sattelle deals mainly with the area of Nicotinic agonist, narrowing it down to issues related to the Neonicotinoid, and often Binding site.
Acetylcholine receptor is a subfield of Receptor that David B. Sattelle tackles.
His research in Receptor intersects with topics in Molecular biology and Cholinergic.
Gene, Drosophila melanogaster, Genome and Gene family are the core of his Genetics study.
His Caenorhabditis elegans study incorporates themes from Spinal muscular atrophy, Motility, RNA interference and Genetic screen.
Between 2006 and 2020, his most popular works were:
- The genome of the model beetle and pest Tribolium castaneum. (1039 citations)
- Genome Sequence of the Pea Aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum (1033 citations)
- Functional and evolutionary insights from the genomes of three parasitoid Nasonia species. (705 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
David B. Sattelle mainly investigates Genetics, Drosophila melanogaster, Caenorhabditis elegans, Gene and Nicotinic agonist.
His Genetics research incorporates elements of Lyme disease and Babesiosis.
His research investigates the connection between Drosophila melanogaster and topics such as Alternative splicing that intersect with problems in RNA editing.
As a part of the same scientific family, David B. Sattelle mostly works in the field of Gene, focusing on Ion channel and, on occasion, Peptide sequence.
His Nicotinic agonist research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Neonicotinoid, Imidacloprid and Acetylcholine receptor.
His Acetylcholine receptor research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Alzheimer's disease and Pharmacology.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
