World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
35
Citations
9403
World Ranking
9218
National Ranking
3306

Geoffrey C. Poole publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Geoffrey C. Poole sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 97 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Geoffrey C. Poole D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Geoffrey C. Poole sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Geoffrey C. Poole is affiliated with Montana State University in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the field of Environmental Science, with a particular focus on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Water Science and Technology, Environmental Chemistry, and Sociology and Political Science.

Their work covers several main topics, including:

  • Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
  • Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
  • Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
  • Public Relations and Crisis Communication
  • Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics

Geoffrey C. Poole has published multiple papers in various scientific journals. Recent papers include:

  • "Narrative Risk Communication as a Lingua Franca for Environmental Hazard Preparation" (2021), published in Environmental Communication
  • "Flood dynamics dictate distributions of Elaeagnus angustifolia L. (Russian olive) on a riverine floodplain" (2020), published in Biological Invasions
  • "Persuasion with Precision: Using Natural Language Processing to Improve Instrument Fidelity for Risk Communication Experimental Treatments" (2022), published in Journal of Mixed Methods Research
  • "Hyporheic hydraulic geometry: Conceptualizing relationships among hyporheic exchange, storage, and water age" (2022), published in PLoS ONE
  • "Ecosystem engineering in the streambed: Net-spinning caddisflies influence hydraulic properties" (2020), published in Ecohydrology

Their frequent coauthors include:

  • Ann Marie Reinhold
  • Lindsey K. Albertson
  • Hayley C. Oakland
  • Elizabeth J. Mohr
  • S. Kathleen Fogg

Poole regularly publishes in journals such as Freshwater Science, PLoS ONE, Hydrological Processes, Environmental Communication, and Biological Invasions.

Best Publications

  • Stream denitrification across biomes and its response to anthropogenic nitrate loading

    Patrick J. Mulholland;Patrick J. Mulholland;Ashley M. Helton;Geoffrey C. Poole;Robert O. Hall

  • An ecological perspective on in-stream temperature: natural heat dynamics and mechanisms of human-caused thermal degradation.

    Geoffrey C. Poole;Cara H. Berman

  • Fluvial landscape ecology: addressing uniqueness within the river discontinuum

    Geoffrey C. Poole

  • Nitrous oxide emission from denitrification in stream and river networks

    Jake J. Beaulieu;Jennifer L. Tank;Stephen K. Hamilton;Wilfred M. Wollheim

  • Process-Based Ecological River Restoration: Visualizing Three-Dimensional Connectivity and Dynamic Vectors to Recover Lost Linkages

    G. Mathias Kondolf;Andrew J. Boulton;Scott O'Daniel;Geoffrey C. Poole

  • Inter-regional comparison of land-use effects on stream metabolism

    Melody J. Bernot;Daniel J. Sobota;Daniel J. Sobota;Robert O. Hall;Patrick J. Mulholland

  • Stream Channel Morphology and Woody Debris in Logged and Unlogged Basins of Western Washington

    Stephen C. Ralph;Geoffrey C. Poole;Loveday L. Conquest;Robert J. Naiman

  • Riverine macrosystems ecology: sensitivity, resistance, and resilience of whole river basins with human alterations

    Kevin E McCluney;Kevin E McCluney;Kevin E McCluney;N LeRoy Poff;Margaret A Palmer;James H Thorp

  • Nitrate removal in stream ecosystems measured by 15N addition experiments: Denitrification

    Patrick J. Mulholland;Patrick J. Mulholland;Robert O. Hall;Daniel J. Sobota;Walter K. Dodds

  • Nitrate removal in stream ecosystems measured by 15N addition experiments: Total uptake

    Robert O. Hall;Jennifer L. Tank;Daniel J. Sobota;Patrick J. Mulholland;Patrick J. Mulholland

  • Buffered, lagged, or cooled? Disentangling hyporheic influences on temperature cycles in stream channels

    Alicia S. Arrigoni;Alicia S. Arrigoni;Geoffrey C. Poole;Geoffrey C. Poole;Leal A. K. Mertes;Scott J. O'Daniel

  • Stream hydrogeomorphology as a physical science basis for advances in stream ecology

    Geoffrey C. Poole

  • Multiscale geomorphic drivers of groundwater flow paths: subsurface hydrologic dynamics and hyporheic habitat diversity

    Geoffrey C. Poole;Jack A. Stanford;Steven W. Running;Christopher A. Frissell

  • In-Stream Habitat Unit Classification: Inadequacies for Monitoring and Some Consequences for Management

    Geoffrey C. Poole;Christopher A. Frissell;Stephen C. Ralph

  • Hydrologic spiralling: the role of multiple interactive flow paths in stream ecosystems

    G. C. Poole;G. C. Poole;S. J. O'Daniel;K. L. Jones;W. W. Woessner

  • Three-dimensional mapping of geomorphic controls on flood-plain hydrology and connectivity from aerial photos

    Geoffrey C Poole;Jack A Stanford;Christopher A Frissell;Steven W Running

  • Thinking Outside the Channel: Modeling Nitrogen Cycling in Networked River Ecosystems

    Ashley M. Helton;Geoffrey C. Poole;Geoffrey C. Poole;Judy L. Meyer;Wilfred M. Wollheim

  • The influence of in-stream structures on summer water temperatures via induced hyporheic exchange

    Erich T. Hester;Martin W. Doyle;Geoffrey C. Poole

  • The Case for Regime-based Water Quality Standards

    Geoffrey C. Poole;Jason B. Dunham;Druscilla M. Keenan;Sally T. Sauter

  • A Protocol for Ecosystem Management

    Jack A. Stanford;Geoffrey C. Poole

Frequent Co-Authors

Jack A. Stanford
Jack A. Stanford University of Montana
Emily S. Bernhardt
Emily S. Bernhardt Duke University
Patrick J. Mulholland
Patrick J. Mulholland Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Robert O. Hall
Robert O. Hall University of Montana
Jennifer L. Tank
Jennifer L. Tank University of Notre Dame
Sherri L. Johnson
Sherri L. Johnson US Forest Service
Walter K. Dodds
Walter K. Dodds Kansas State University
Bruce J. Peterson
Bruce J. Peterson Marine Biological Laboratory
Jackson R. Webster
Jackson R. Webster Virginia Tech
William H. McDowell
William H. McDowell University of New Hampshire

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities. A bachelors degree in sociology online offers insights into societal impacts on the environment and prepares graduates for roles in community planning and environmental policy.

For advanced professionals, enrolling in doctorate degree online no dissertation programs can accelerate career growth without the traditional dissertation barrier. These degrees often focus on practical application and leadership, ideal for those aiming to influence environmental education or organizational change.

When selecting a program, accreditation is vital. Many students opt for accredited eds to edd programs to ensure quality education and better job prospects in academia or government agencies related to environmental management.

Cost is also a key consideration. Those seeking affordability can find competitive options among the cheapest online dsw programs, which provide specialized training relevant to environmental social work and community advocacy roles.

Best Scientists Citing Geoffrey C. Poole

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles