World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
36
Citations
6512
World Ranking
7043
National Ranking
2371

Katja Poveda publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Katja Poveda sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 100 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Katja Poveda D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Katja Poveda sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Katja Poveda is affiliated with Cornell University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with a significant number of publications in this field. Subfields of their study include Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Genetics, and Nature and Landscape Conservation.

Their work encompasses several main topics that include Plant and Animal Studies, Insect-Plant Interactions and Control, Insect and Pesticide Research, Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior, Plant Parasitism and Resistance, Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, and Agricultural Innovations and Practices.

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Katja Poveda are:

  • Interaction diversity explains the maintenance of phytochemical diversity, 2021, Ecology Letters
  • Diet diversity and pesticide risk mediate the negative effects of land use change on solitary bee offspring production, 2020, Journal of Applied Ecology
  • Models of natural pest control: Towards predictions across agricultural landscapes, 2021, Biological Control
  • Natural habitat partially mitigates negative pesticide effects on tropical pollinator communities, 2021, Global Ecology and Conservation
  • The effects of crop type, landscape composition and agroecological practices on biodiversity and ecosystem services in tropical smallholder farms, 2023, Journal of Applied Ecology

Frequent co-authors with whom Katja Poveda has collaborated include:

  • Heather Grab
  • Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter
  • Tim Luttermoser
  • Mattias Jonsson
  • Aaron L. Iverson

Their research contributions have appeared repeatedly in several publication venues, among which the most common are:

  • Journal of Applied Ecology
  • PLoS ONE
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Ecology Letters
  • Ecological Applications

Best Publications

  • A global synthesis reveals biodiversity-mediated benefits for crop production

    Matteo Dainese;Emily A. Martin;Marcelo A. Aizen;Matthias Albrecht

  • Crop pests and predators exhibit inconsistent responses to surrounding landscape composition

    Daniel S. Karp;Rebecca E Chaplin-Kramer;Timothy D. Meehan;Emily A. Martin

  • When natural habitat fails to enhance biological pest control – Five hypotheses ☆

    Teja Tscharntke;Daniel S. Karp;Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer;Péter Batáry

  • A global synthesis of the effects of diversified farming systems on arthropod diversity within fields and across agricultural landscapes.

    Elinor M. Lichtenberg;Elinor M. Lichtenberg;Christina M. Kennedy;Claire Kremen;Péter Batáry

  • The database of the PREDICTS (Projecting Responses of Ecological Diversity In Changing Terrestrial Systems) project

    Lawrence N. Hudson;Tim Newbold;Tim Newbold;Sara Contu;Samantha L.L. Hill;Samantha L.L. Hill

  • The PREDICTS database: a global database of how local terrestrial biodiversity responds to human impacts

    Lawrence N Hudson;Tim Newbold;Tim Newbold;Sara Contu;Samantha L L Hill;Samantha L L Hill

  • Agriculturally dominated landscapes reduce bee phylogenetic diversity and pollination services

    Heather Grab;Michael G. Branstetter;Nolan Amon;Nolan Amon;Katherine R. Urban-Mead

  • Herbivory‐mediated pollinator limitation: negative impacts of induced volatiles on plant–pollinator interactions

    André Kessler;Rayko Halitschke;Katja Poveda

  • Domestication impacts on plant-herbivore interactions: a meta-analysis

    Susan R. Whitehead;Martin M. Turcotte;Katja Poveda

  • Effects of below- and above-ground herbivores on plant growth, flower visitation and seed set

    Katja Poveda;Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter;Stefan Scheu;Teja Tscharntke

  • Diversification practices: their effect on pest regulation and production

    Katja Poveda;María Isabel Gómez;Eliana Martínez

  • Landscape simplification decreases wild bee pollination services to strawberry

    Heather Connelly;Katja Poveda;Gregory Loeb

  • Predicting bee community responses to land-use changes : Effects of geographic and taxonomic biases

    Adriana De Palma;Adriana De Palma;Stefan Abrahamczyk;Marcelo A. Aizen;Matthias Albrecht

  • Effects of decomposers and herbivores on plant performance and aboveground plant-insect interactions

    Katja Poveda;Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter;Stefan Scheu;Teja Tscharntke

  • The raison d'être of chemical ecology

    Robert A. Raguso;Anurag A. Agrawal;Angela E. Douglas;Georg Jander

  • Landscape simplification and altitude affect biodiversity, herbivory and Andean potato yield

    Katja Poveda;Eliana Martínez;Monica F. Kersch‐Becker;Maria A. Bonilla

  • Landscape simplification reduces classical biological control and crop yield

    Heather Grab;Bryan Danforth;Katja Poveda;Greg Loeb

  • Temporally dependent pollinator competition and facilitation with mass flowering crops affects yield in co-blooming crops

    Heather Grab;Eleanor J. Blitzer;Bryan Danforth;Greg Loeb

  • The eco-evolutionary impacts of domestication and agricultural practices on wild species.

    Martin M. Turcotte;Hitoshi Araki;Daniel S. Karp;Katja Poveda

  • The enemy as ally: herbivore-induced increase in crop yield

    Katja Poveda;Katja Poveda;María Isabel Gómez Jiménez;André Kessler

  • Interaction diversity explains the maintenance of phytochemical diversity

    Susan R. Whitehead;Susan R. Whitehead;Ethan Bass;Alexsandra Corrigan;André Kessler

  • A global synthesis reveals biodiversity-mediated benefits for crop production

    Matteo Dainese;Emily A. Martin;Marcelo A. Aizen;Matthias Albrecht

Frequent Co-Authors

Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter
Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter University of Würzburg
Teja Tscharntke
Teja Tscharntke University of Göttingen
Andy Purvis
Andy Purvis Natural History Museum
Tim Diekötter
Tim Diekötter Kiel University
Tim Newbold
Tim Newbold University College London
Samantha L. L. Hill
Samantha L. L. Hill World Conservation Monitoring Centre
Jason M. Tylianakis
Jason M. Tylianakis University of Canterbury
André Kessler
André Kessler Cornell University
Tom M. Fayle
Tom M. Fayle Queen Mary University of London
Marcelo A. Aizen
Marcelo A. Aizen National University of Comahue

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in Ecology and Evolution, there are a range of online degrees and career pathways that complement this field. Many students choose interdisciplinary programs, such as environmental policy, social work, or psychology, to broaden their understanding and enhance their career prospects.

For those with a military background, exploring military friendly colleges online can offer flexible learning options. These institutions support service members and veterans who might pursue ecological or environmental science degrees alongside other disciplines.

Another related and impactful path is through online msw programs, where students learn about human-environment interactions, advocacy, and community welfare. If your interests include the psychological side of environmental change, consider programs like accelerated masters in psychology or specialties such as online masters in mental health counseling. These paths provide skills to assess, manage, and communicate the psychological impacts of environmental issues.

Exploring these diverse online degrees enables you to build a multidisciplinary profile, making you well-prepared for careers in conservation, public health, environmental education, or policy-making in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Katja Poveda

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles