World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Henrik G. Smith

Henrik G. Smith

Award Badge
Ecology and Evolution
Sweden
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
93
Citations
29812
World Ranking
399
National Ranking
5

Henrik G. Smith publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Henrik G. Smith sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 332 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Henrik G. Smith D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Henrik G. Smith sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 93 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Ecology and Evolution in Sweden Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Ecology and Evolution in Sweden Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Ecology and Evolution in Sweden Leader Award

Overview

Henrik G. Smith is affiliated with Lund University in Sweden and has contributed extensively to the fields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Environmental Science. Their research output includes significant work in subfields such as Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science, and Genetics.

Their main research topics encompass Plant and Animal Studies, Insect and Pesticide Research, Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior, Plant Parasitism and Resistance, Insect-Plant Interactions and Control, and Forest Management and Policy.

Henrik G. Smith has published numerous articles in several scientific journals. They are frequently published in:

  • Journal of Applied Ecology
  • Biological Conservation
  • Basic and Applied Ecology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Selected recent publications include:

  • Crop diversity benefits carabid and pollinator communities in landscapes with semi-natural habitats, 2020, Journal of Applied Ecology
  • The potential and realized foraging movements of bees are differentially determined by body size and sociality, 2022, Ecology
  • Wild insect diversity increases inter-annual stability in global crop pollinator communities, 2021, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • Wild bees and hoverflies respond differently to urbanisation, human population density and urban form, 2020, Landscape and Urban Planning
  • Impacts of the EU's Common Agricultural Policy "Greening" Reform on Agricultural Development, Biodiversity, and Ecosystem Services, 2020, Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy

Henrik G. Smith collaborates regularly with a number of co-authors, including Johan Ekroos, Yann Clough, Maj Rundlöf, Simon G. Potts, and Björn K. Klatt, with respective collaboration counts of 24, 18, 15, 13, and 10 publications together.

Best Publications

  • Seed coating with a neonicotinoid insecticide negatively affects wild bees

    Maj Rundlöf;Georg K.S. Andersson;Riccardo Bommarco;Ingemar Fries

  • Delivery of crop pollination services is an insufficient argument for wild pollinator conservation

    David Kleijn;Rachael Winfree;Ignasi Bartomeus;Luísa G. Carvalheiro;Luísa G. Carvalheiro

  • Non-bee insects are important contributors to global crop pollination

    Romina Rader;Ignasi Bartomeus;Lucas A. Garibaldi;Michael P.D. Garratt

  • Grasslands—more important for ecosystem services than you might think

    J. Bengtsson;J. Bengtsson;J. M. Bullock;B. Egoh;B. Egoh;C. Everson

  • A global synthesis reveals biodiversity-mediated benefits for crop production

    Matteo Dainese;Emily A. Martin;Marcelo A. Aizen;Matthias Albrecht

  • Does conservation on farmland contribute to halting the biodiversity decline

    David Kleijn;Maj Rundlöf;Maj Rundlöf;Jeroen Scheper;Henrik G. Smith

  • Land Sparing Versus Land Sharing: Moving Forward

    Jörn Fischer;David James Abson;Van Butsic;Van Butsic;M Jahi Chappell;M Jahi Chappell

  • Crop pests and predators exhibit inconsistent responses to surrounding landscape composition

    Daniel S. Karp;Rebecca E Chaplin-Kramer;Timothy D. Meehan;Emily A. Martin

  • Semi‐natural grasslands as population sources for pollinating insects in agricultural landscapes

    Erik Öckinger;Henrik G. Smith

  • The interplay of landscape composition and configuration: new pathways to manage functional biodiversity and agroecosystem services across Europe

    Emily A. Martin;Matteo Dainese;Yann Clough;András Báldi

  • Environmental factors driving the effectiveness of European agri‐environmental measures in mitigating pollinator loss – a meta‐analysis

    Jeroen Scheper;Andrea Holzschuh;Mikko Kuussaari;Simon G. Potts

  • Combined effects of global change pressures on animal-mediated pollination

    Juan P. González-Varo;Jacobus C. Biesmeijer;Riccardo Bommarco;Simon G. Potts

  • Neonicotinoid Insecticides and Their Impacts on Bees: A Systematic Review of Research Approaches and Identification of Knowledge Gaps.

    Ola Lundin;Maj Rundlöf;Henrik G. Smith;Ingemar Fries

  • Drastic historic shifts in bumble-bee community composition in Sweden

    Riccardo Bommarco;Ola Lundin;Henrik G. Smith;Maj Rundlöf

  • The effect of organic farming on butterfly diversity depends on landscape context

    Maj Rundlöf;Henrik Smith

  • The design of artificial nestboxes for the study of secondary hole-nesting birds: a review of methodological inconsistencies and potential biases

    Marcel M. Lambrechts;Frank Adriaensen;Daniel R. Ardia;Alexandr V. Artemyev

  • Interacting effects of farming practice and landscape context on bumble bees

    Maj Rundlöf;Helena Nilsson;Henrik G. Smith

  • Local and landscape-level floral resources explain effects of wildflower strips on wild bees across four European countries

    Jeroen Scheper;Riccardo Bommarco;Andrea Holzschuh;Simon G. Potts

  • Effects of grassland abandonment, restoration and management on butterflies and vascular plants

    Erik Öckinger;Anna K. Eriksson;Henrik G. Smith

  • Mass‐flowering crops dilute pollinator abundance in agricultural landscapes across Europe

    Andrea Holzschuh;Matteo Dainese;Juan P. González‐Varo;Sonja Mudri‐Stojnić

  • Land sparing versus land sharing: moving forward.

    J. Fischer;D. J. Abson;V. Butsic;M. J. Chappell

Frequent Co-Authors

Maj Rundlöf
Maj Rundlöf Lund University
Johan Ekroos
Johan Ekroos Lund University
Riccardo Bommarco
Riccardo Bommarco Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Klaus Birkhofer
Klaus Birkhofer Brandenburg University of Technology
Erik Öckinger
Erik Öckinger Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Simon G. Potts
Simon G. Potts University of Reading
Åke Lindström
Åke Lindström Lund University
Yann Clough
Yann Clough Lund University
Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter
Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter University of Würzburg
Katarina Hedlund
Katarina Hedlund Lund University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution opens the door to a range of impactful careers that intersect with psychology, counseling, and the biological sciences. Many students find that adding related fields can expand their expertise and career flexibility.

Those interested in applying behavioral science to legal and conservation issues may be drawn to careers in forensic psychology. This field bridges biology, behavior, and criminal justice—offering a unique perspective on human and animal behavior in real-world settings.

For students passionate about developmental science, an online child psychology degree can be a practical complement. It fosters skills to address developmental challenges, which are vital in both human populations and wildlife conservation education.

Additionally, pursuing online master’s in counseling programs can provide strong foundations for roles in environmental education, outreach, and advocacy. Understanding communication and mental health supports broader impacts in ecological work.

Those seeking clinical expertise may consider clinical psychology programs online to build skills applicable in research, policy, or interdisciplinary team settings. Each pathway enhances the ability to contribute meaningfully to ecological and evolutionary fields.

Best Scientists Citing Henrik G. Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles