World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
50
Citations
6757
World Ranking
3924
National Ranking
1368

Scott K. Sakaluk publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott K. Sakaluk sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 182 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Scott K. Sakaluk D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott K. Sakaluk sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Scott K. Sakaluk is affiliated with Illinois State University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with notable contributions to Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology.

Their work focuses on several interconnected subfields, including Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Genetics, Ecology, and Developmental Biology. Key research topics include Animal Behavior and Reproduction, Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior, Insect Utilization and Effects, Plant and Animal Studies, Avian Ecology and Behavior, Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior, and Invertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms.

Scott K. Sakaluk has published extensively, with a significant presence in various scientific outlets. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Evolution
  • Animal Behaviour
  • Journal für Ornithologie
  • Journal of Evolutionary Biology
  • Ecology and Evolution

Their recent scholarly articles include:

  • Active and Covert Infections of Cricket Iridovirus and Acheta domesticus Densovirus in Reared Gryllodes sigillatus Crickets, 2021, Frontiers in Microbiology
  • Dynamic terminal investment in male burying beetles, 2020, Animal Behaviour
  • A global initiative for ecological and evolutionary hologenomics, 2024, Trends in Ecology & Evolution
  • Connecting the dots: avian eggshell pigmentation, female condition and paternal provisioning effort, 2020, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
  • Intralocus sexual conflict over optimal nutrient intake and the evolution of sex differences in life span and reproduction, 2021, Functional Ecology

The scientist has collaborated frequently with a number of peers. Prominent coauthors include:

  • John Hunt
  • Ben M. Sadd
  • Charles F. Thompson
  • Kristin R. Duffield
  • Bert Foquet

Best Publications

  • Male crickets feed females to ensure complete sperm transfer

    Scott K. Sakaluk

  • Gecko phonotaxis to cricket calling song: A case of satellite predation

    Scott K. Sakaluk;Jacqueline J. Belwood

  • A dynamic threshold model for terminal investment.

    Kristin R. Duffield;E. Keith Bowers;Scott K. Sakaluk;Ben M. Sadd

  • Sensory exploitation as an evolutionary origin to nuptial food gifts in insects.

    Scott K. Sakaluk

  • FEMALE CONTROL OF SPERM TRANSFER AND INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION IN SPERM PRECEDENCE: ANTECEDENTS TO THE EVOLUTION OF A COURTSHIP FOOD GIFT.

    Scott K. Sakaluk;Anne-Katrin Eggert

  • Polyandry promotes enhanced offspring survival in decorated crickets.

    Tracie M. Ivy;Scott K. Sakaluk

  • Spermatophore size and its role in the reproductive behaviour of the cricket, Gryllodes supplicans (Orthoptera: Gryllidae)

    Scott K. Sakaluk

  • Females use self-referent cues to avoid mating with previous mates

    Tracie M Ivy;Carie B Weddle;Scott K Sakaluk

  • POLYANDRY PROMOTES ENHANCED OFFSPRING SURVIVAL IN DECORATED CRICKETS

    Unknown

  • SPERM COMPETITION AND THE EVOLUTION OF NUPTIAL FEEDING BEHAVIOR IN THE CRICKET, GRYLLODES SUPPLICANS (WALKER).

    Scott K. Sakaluk

  • Neonatal body condition, immune responsiveness, and hematocrit predict longevity in a wild bird population

    E. Keith Bowers;Christine J. Hodges;Anna M. Forsman;Laura A. Vogel

  • Female mating frequency and progeny production in singly and doubly mated house and field crickets

    Scott K. Sakaluk;William H. Cade

  • Ejaculate expenditures of male crickets in response to varying risk and intensity of sperm competition: not all species play games

    Jennifer M. Schaus;Scott K. Sakaluk

  • Reproductive Behaviour of the Decorated Cricket, Gryllodes Supplicans (Orthoptera: Gryllidae): Calling Schedules, Spatial Distribution, and Mating

    Scott K. Sakaluk

  • Post-copulatory mate guarding in decorated crickets

    Scott K. Sakaluk

  • Repeated matings offset costs of reproduction in female crickets

    Dianne M. Burpee;Scott K. Sakaluk

  • Experimentally induced spermatophore production and immune responses reveal a trade-off in crickets

    Angela M. Kerr;Susan N. Gershman;Scott K. Sakaluk

  • Polyandry and fitness of offspring reared under varying nutritional stress in decorated crickets.

    Scott K. Sakaluk;Jennifer M. Schaus;Anne-Katrin Eggert;W. Andrew Snedden

  • Cryptic sexual conflict in gift-giving insects: chasing the chase-away.

    Scott K. Sakaluk;Rachel L. Avery;Carie B. Weddle

  • The Gin Trap as a Device Facilitating Coercive Mating in Sagebrush Crickets

    Scott K. Sakaluk;Patricia J. Bangert;Anne-Katrin Eggert;Claudia Gack

  • Carcass maintenance and biparental brood care in burying beetles: are males redundant?

    Josef K. Müller;Anne‐Katrin Eggert;Anne‐Katrin Eggert;Scott K. Sakaluk

  • The Geometry of Nutrient Space–Based Life-History Trade-Offs: Sex-Specific Effects of Macronutrient Intake on the Trade-Off between Encapsulation Ability and Reproductive Effort in Decorated Crickets

    James Rapkin;Kim Jensen;Kim Jensen;C Ruth Archer;Clarissa M House;Clarissa M House

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles F. Thompson
Charles F. Thompson Illinois State University
John Hunt
John Hunt Western Sydney University
Anne-Katrin Eggert
Anne-Katrin Eggert Illinois State University
L. Scott Johnson
L. Scott Johnson Towson University
Heiko Vogel
Heiko Vogel Max Planck Society
Nick J. Royle
Nick J. Royle University of Exeter
Aleš Svatoš
Aleš Svatoš Max Planck Society
Richard H. ffrench-Constant
Richard H. ffrench-Constant University of Exeter
David G. Heckel
David G. Heckel Max Planck Society
Colin Selman
Colin Selman University of Glasgow

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution opens doors to a broad range of science-related careers, both in research and applied fields. Many students interested in shifting disciplines now benefit from flexible online education options. For example, those with a science background who want to switch to allied health fields may consider online bridge programs non-SLP majors to transition into speech-language pathology.

Similarly, students with non-nursing degrees who wish to enter nursing can explore non nursing degree to bsn online options. These expedited programs allow for a quicker career change—bridging science, healthcare, and public service.

For those considering advanced healthcare roles, knowing financial prospects can help guide your decision. For instance, DNP-trained nurses can review typical compensation information in the dnp psychiatric nurse practitioner salary guide. If timing is key, you may also want to learn how long to become nurse practitioner through various online routes.

These online pathways can help you merge your background in ecology and evolution with high-demand professions in healthcare and science.

Best Scientists Citing Scott K. Sakaluk

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles