World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
37
Citations
6816
World Ranking
6798
National Ranking
356

Hanno Schaefer publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hanno Schaefer sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 107 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Hanno Schaefer D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hanno Schaefer sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Hanno Schaefer is affiliated with the Technical University of Munich in Germany. Their research spans multiple disciplines within the biological sciences, focusing primarily on agricultural and biological sciences, biochemistry, genetics and molecular biology, and environmental science.

Their work encompasses several subfields including ecology, evolution, behavior and systematics; plant science; genetics; molecular biology; and nature and landscape conservation. These areas connect closely to the main topics they address, which cover plant and animal studies, ecology and vegetation dynamics, plant diversity and evolution, species distribution and climate change, genetic diversity and population structure, advances in Cucurbitaceae research, and genomics and phylogenetic studies.

Hanno Schaefer's research output includes publications in a range of scientific venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Phytotaxa
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Systematic Botany
  • Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
  • Scientific Reports

Their recent papers illustrate diverse interests and collaborations. Notable publications are:

  • Macaronesia as a Fruitful Arena for Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation Biology, 2021, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
  • Phylogenetic informativeness analyses to clarify past diversification processes in Cucurbitaceae, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • Enhancing photosynthesis at high light levels by adaptive laboratory evolution, 2021, Nature Plants
  • Is there solid evidence of widespread landscape disturbance in the Azores before the arrival of the Portuguese?, 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • A novel phylogenomics pipeline reveals complex pattern of reticulate evolution in Cucurbitales, 2023, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Hanno Schaefer include Edgardo M. Ortiz, Jairo Patiño, Paulo A. V. Borges, Miguel Menezes de Sequeira, and Mónica Moura. These collaborations reflect a network of researchers working in related fields of plant systematics, evolution, and molecular biology.

Best Publications

  • Cucumber (Cucumis sativus) and melon (C. melo) have numerous wild relatives in Asia and Australia, and the sister species of melon is from Australia

    Patrizia Sebastian;Hanno Schaefer;Ian R. H. Telford;Susanne S. Renner

  • Legume Crops Phylogeny and Genetic Diversity for Science and Breeding

    Petr Smýkal;Clarice J. Coyne;Mike J. Ambrose;Nigel Maxted

  • Phylogenomics and a posteriori data partitioning resolve the Cretaceous angiosperm radiation Malpighiales

    Zhenxiang Xi;Brad R. Ruhfel;Brad R. Ruhfel;Hanno Schaefer;Hanno Schaefer;André M. Amorim

  • Phylogenetic relationships in the order Cucurbitales and a new classification of the gourd family (Cucurbitaceae)

    Hanno Schaefer;Susanne S. Renner

  • Gourds afloat: a dated phylogeny reveals an Asian origin of the gourd family (Cucurbitaceae) and numerous oversea dispersal events.

    Hanno Schaefer;Christoph Heibl;Susanne S Renner

  • Phylogenetics of Cucumis (Cucurbitaceae): Cucumber (C. sativus) belongs in an Asian/Australian clade far from melon (C. melo)

    Susanne S Renner;Hanno Schaefer;Alexander Kocyan

  • A multi-locus chloroplast phylogeny for the Cucurbitaceae and its implications for character evolution and classification.

    Alexander Kocyan;Li-Bing Zhang;Hanno Schaefer;Susanne S. Renner

  • Origin and domestication of Cucurbitaceae crops: insights from phylogenies, genomics and archaeology

    Guillaume Chomicki;Hanno Schaefer;Susanne S. Renner

  • A comprehensive genome variation map of melon identifies multiple domestication events and loci influencing agronomic traits.

    Guangwei Zhao;Qun Lian;Zhonghua Zhang;Qiushi Fu

  • Systematics, biogeography, and character evolution of the legume tribe Fabeae with special focus on the middle-Atlantic island lineages

    Hanno Schaefer;Paulina Hechenleitner;Arnoldo Santos-Guerra;Miguel Menezes de Sequeira

  • A three-genome phylogeny of Momordica (Cucurbitaceae) suggests seven returns from dioecy to monoecy and recent long-distance dispersal to Asia.

    Hanno Schaefer;Susanne S. Renner

  • Temperature-dependent shifts in phenology contribute to the success of exotic species with climate change

    Elizabeth M. Wolkovich;Elizabeth M. Wolkovich;T. Jonathan Davies;Hanno Schaefer;Hanno Schaefer;Elsa E. Cleland

  • Testing Darwin's naturalization hypothesis in the Azores.

    Hanno Schaefer;Hanno Schaefer;Olivier J. Hardy;Luís Silva;Timothy G. Barraclough

  • The evolution and loss of oil-offering flowers: new insights from dated phylogenies for angiosperms and bees

    S. S. Renner;H. Schaefer

  • Cyclic peptides arising by evolutionary parallelism via asparaginyl-endopeptidase–mediated biosynthesis

    Joshua S. Mylne;Lai Yue Chan;Aurelie H. Chanson;Norelle L. Daly

  • Evolutionary dynamics of host specialization in wood-decay fungi

    Franz-Sebastian Krah;Claus Bässler;Christoph Heibl;John Soghigian

  • Global Island Monitoring Scheme (GIMS): a proposal for the long‐term coordinated survey and monitoring of native island forest biota

    Paulo A. V. Borges;Paulo A. V. Borges;Pedro Cardoso;Pedro Cardoso;Pedro Cardoso;Holger Kreft;Robert J. Whittaker;Robert J. Whittaker

  • Long-term morphological stasis maintained by a plant–pollinator mutualism

    Charles C. Davis;Hanno Schaefer;Hanno Schaefer;Zhenxiang Xi;David A. Baum

  • The Azores diversity enigma: why are there so few Azorean endemic flowering plants and why are they so widespread?

    Mark A. Carine;Hanno Schaefer

  • Macaronesia as a Fruitful Arena for Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation Biology

    Margarita Florencio;Jairo Patiño;Jairo Patiño;Jairo Patiño;Sandra Nogué;Anna Traveset

  • there so few Azorean endemic flowering plants and why are they so widespread

    Mark A. Carine;Hanno Schaefer

Frequent Co-Authors

Susanne S. Renner
Susanne S. Renner Washington University in St. Louis
Jairo Patiño
Jairo Patiño Instituto de Productos Naturales y Agrobiología
Charles C. Davis
Charles C. Davis Harvard University
Paulo A. V. Borges
Paulo A. V. Borges University of the Azores
Claus Bässler
Claus Bässler Goethe University Frankfurt
Pedro Cardoso
Pedro Cardoso University of Lisbon
José María Fernández-Palacios
José María Fernández-Palacios University of La Laguna
Manuel J. Steinbauer
Manuel J. Steinbauer University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Michelle van der Bank
Michelle van der Bank University of Johannesburg
Vincent Savolainen
Vincent Savolainen Imperial College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in Ecology and Evolution, exploring careers in healthcare can offer alternative pathways that utilize scientific skills and knowledge. Nursing is one of the most popular fields, and fast-track options are available for motivated students. Understanding how long to become nurse practitioner is important, as advanced roles often require further study beyond a bachelor’s degree.

Online programs make it easier than ever to change or advance your career. Some institutions offer accelerated tracks, such as the rn to bsn 6 months programs designed to help registered nurses quickly obtain a Bachelor of Science in Nursing. There are also adn to np bridge programs for those holding an Associate Degree in Nursing who wish to pursue a Nurse Practitioner credential.

If you have a bachelor’s degree in another field, direct entry msn online programs offer a route into advanced nursing. These options provide flexibility, allowing you to transition into high-impact, science-driven healthcare careers alongside your interest in ecological and evolutionary science.

Best Scientists Citing Hanno Schaefer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles