World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Holly Rushmeier

Holly Rushmeier

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 48 6097 5923 2743 2645 240 11814

Holly Rushmeier publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Holly Rushmeier between 1986 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Holly Rushmeier published across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025, averaging 6.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2008. 12 of the 264 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2008. 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 18 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 5 publications
1986 2025

264 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Holly Rushmeier: publications per year, 1986 to 2025
Year Publications
1986 1
1987 1
1988 1
1989 1
1990 2
1991 4
1992 0
1993 4
1994 6
1995 4
1996 4
1997 7
1998 4
1999 5
2000 7
2001 6
2002 6
2003 11
2004 9
2005 13
2006 7
2007 7
2008 18
2009 6
2010 3
2011 15
2012 9
2013 10
2014 12
2015 10
2016 12
2017 13
2018 9
2019 7
2020 2
2021 10
2022 4
2023 2
2024 7
2025 5
Total 264
Download as CSV

Holly Rushmeier publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Holly Rushmeier sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 232–241 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 240 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423 240
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Holly Rushmeier D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Holly Rushmeier sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543 48
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2016 - ACM Fellow For work on global illumination, material capture, and display of high-dynamic-range images.
  • 2006 - ACM Distinguished Member

Overview

Holly Rushmeier is affiliated with Yale University in the United States and has an extensive body of research primarily in computer science and engineering. Their research spans multiple subfields, including computer vision and pattern recognition, computational mechanics, computer graphics and computer-aided design, geology, and industrial and manufacturing engineering.

Their work concentrates on a range of topics, notably 3D shape modeling and analysis, computer graphics and visualization techniques, and 3D surveying and cultural heritage. Additional areas include human motion and animation, advanced vision and imaging, generative adversarial networks and image synthesis, and advanced image and video retrieval techniques.

A selection of recent papers illustrates the scope of their research:

  • "The Role of Subsurface Scattering in Glossiness Perception" (2021), published in ACM Transactions on Applied Perception
  • "Tracing versus freehand for evaluating computer-generated drawings" (2021), published in ACM Transactions on Graphics
  • "Controlling Material Appearance by Examples" (2022), published in Computer Graphics Forum
  • "NeMF: Neural Motion Fields for Kinematic Animation" (2022), published on arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Remote Sensing and Machine Learning for Accurate Fire Severity Mapping in Northern Algeria" (2024), published in Remote Sensing

Frequent collaborators in their publishing career include Julie Dorsey, Chengan He, Zeyu Wang, Sherry Qiu, and Weiqi Shi. Their work has appeared in several notable publication venues:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • ACM Transactions on Graphics
  • ACM Transactions on Applied Perception
  • Computer Graphics Forum
  • Remote Sensing

Rushmeier has received recognition such as being named an ACM Fellow in 2016 for contributions related to global illumination, material capture, and display of high-dynamic-range images. They were also designated an ACM Distinguished Member in 2006.

Best Publications

  • The ball-pivoting algorithm for surface reconstruction

    F. Bernardini;J. Mittleman;H. Rushmeier;C. Silva

  • A visibility matching tone reproduction operator for high dynamic range scenes

    G.W. Larson;H. Rushmeier;C. Piatko

  • The 3D Model Acquisition Pipeline

    Fausto Bernardini;Holly E. Rushmeier

  • Tone reproduction for realistic images

    J. Tumblin;H. Rushmeier

  • High-quality texture reconstruction from multiple scans

    F. Bernardini;I.M. Martin;H. Rushmeier

  • The zonal method for calculating light intensities in the presence of a participating medium

    Holly E. Rushmeier;Kenneth E. Torrance

  • Building a digital model of Michelangelo's Florentine Pieta

    F. Bernardini;H. Rushmeier;I.M. Martin;J. Mittleman

  • Improving radiosity solutions through the use of analytically determined form-factors

    D. R. Baum;H. E. Rushmeier;J. M. Winget

  • A progressive multi-pass method for global illumination

    Shenchang Eric Chen;Holly E. Rushmeier;Gavin Miller;Douglass Turner

  • Digital Modeling of Material Appearance

    Julie Dorsey;Holly Rushmeier;Franois Sillion

  • An experimental evaluation of computer graphics imagery

    Gary W. Meyer;Holly E. Rushmeier;Michael F. Cohen;Donald P. Greenberg

  • Comparing Real and Synthetic Images: Some Ideas About Metrics

    Holly E. Rushmeier;Gregory J. Ward;Christine D. Piatko;Phil Sanders

  • 3D imaging spectroscopy for measuring hyperspectral patterns on solid objects

    Min H. Kim;Todd Alan Harvey;David S. Kittle;Holly Rushmeier

  • Appying Shape from Lighting Variation to Bump Map Capture

    Holly E. Rushmeier;Gabriel Taubin;André Guéziec

  • Understanding and improving the realism of image composites

    Su Xue;Aseem Agarwala;Julie Dorsey;Holly Rushmeier

  • A Scalable Parallel Algorithm for Self-Organizing Maps with Applications to Sparse Data Mining Problems

    Unknown

  • Parameterization of triangle meshes over quadrilateral domains

    Ioana Boier-Martin;Holly Rushmeier;Jingyi Jin

  • Extending the radiosity method to include specularly reflecting and translucent materials

    Holly E. Rushmeier;Kenneth E. Torrance

  • Context-aware textures

    Jianye Lu;Athinodoros S. Georghiades;Andreas Glaser;Hongzhi Wu

  • Are image quality metrics adequate to evaluate the quality of geometric objects

    Bernice E. Rogowitz;Holly E. Rushmeier

  • A Review of Digital Terrain Modeling

    Eric Galin;Eric Guérin;Adrien Peytavie;Guillaume Cordonnier

  • A visibility matching tone reproduction operator for high dynamic range scenes

    Gregory Ward Larson;Holly Rushmeier;Christine Piatko

Frequent Co-Authors

Julie Dorsey
Julie Dorsey Yale University
Gabriel Taubin
Gabriel Taubin Brown University
Cláudio T. Silva
Cláudio T. Silva New York University
Reinhard Klein
Reinhard Klein University of Bonn
Enrico Gobbetti
Enrico Gobbetti Center for Advanced Studies Research and Development in Sardinia
Hans-Peter Seidel
Hans-Peter Seidel Max Planck Institute for Informatics
François X. Sillion
François X. Sillion French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Silvio Savarese
Silvio Savarese Stanford University
Pietro Perona
Pietro Perona California Institute of Technology
Heinrich H. Bülthoff
Heinrich H. Bülthoff Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a variety of online degree options and career pathways. Many students choose to specialize in a related field, such as cybersecurity. If you’re interested in defending digital systems, an online cyber security degree can offer flexible study and strong job prospects.

For those drawn to project management outside traditional IT roles, an online construction management degree cost is a crucial factor to consider. These programs teach how to lead teams and manage building projects, blending technical and management skills.

Another pathway is in public safety, where a criminal justice degree prepares graduates for roles in law enforcement, corrections, or legal support. The blend of technology and justice is especially prominent as cybercrime rises.

Finally, for students who prefer business and finance, understanding the online accounting degree cost can help you plan for a rewarding career handling digital financial records and data security.

These diverse online degrees are affordable, flexible, and build versatile skills, helping students tailor their education to match the evolving demands of tech-driven industries.

Best Scientists Citing Holly Rushmeier

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles