World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
64
Citations
11482
World Ranking
2386
National Ranking
957

James D. Doyle publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James D. Doyle sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 301 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

James D. Doyle D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James D. Doyle sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

James D. Doyle is affiliated with the United States Naval Research Laboratory. Their research predominantly focuses on Earth and Planetary Sciences, with significant contributions in Environmental Science.

The scientist's work spans several subfields including Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Oceanography, Artificial Intelligence, and Earth-Surface Processes. Their research often addresses topics such as Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations, Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research, Climate Variability and Models, Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing, Arctic and Antarctic Ice Dynamics, Climate Change and Permafrost, and Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes.

James D. Doyle has published extensively in a range of scientific journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Monthly Weather Review
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Weather and Forecasting

The scientist has collaborated repeatedly with several co-authors, notably:

  • Carolyn A. Reynolds
  • Peter M. Finocchio
  • Jonathan R. Moskaitis
  • F. Martin Ralph
  • Vijay Tallapragada

Recent notable papers authored by or involving this scientist include:

  • "Modeling the Morphodynamics of Coastal Responses to Extreme Events: What Shape Are We In?" (2021), published in Annual Review of Marine Science
  • "West Coast Forecast Challenges and Development of Atmospheric River Reconnaissance" (2020), published in Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • "The Role of Cyclones in Moisture Transport into the Arctic" (2020), published in Geophysical Research Letters
  • "The winter central Arctic surface energy budget: A model evaluation using observations from the MOSAiC campaign" (2023), published in Elementa Science of the Anthropocene
  • "Observation of Jet Stream Winds during NAWDEX and Characterization of Systematic Meteorological Analysis Errors" (2020), published in Monthly Weather Review

Best Publications

  • The Dynamics of Mountain-Wave-Induced Rotors

    James D. Doyle;Dale R. Durran

  • The deep propagating gravity wave experiment (deepwave): an airborne and ground-based exploration of gravity wave propagation and effects from their sources throughout the lower and middle atmosphere

    David C. Fritts;Ronald B. Smith;Michael J. Taylor;James D. Doyle

  • Flow response to large-scale topography: the Greenland tip jet

    James D. Doyle;Melvyn A. Shapiro

  • The terrain-induced rotor experiment: A field campaign overview including observational highlights

    Vanda Grubišić;James D. Doyle;Joachim Kuettner;Stephen Mobbs

  • Assessment of wind quality for oceanographic modelling in semi-enclosed basins

    Richard P. Signell;Sandro Carniel;Luigi Cavaleri;Jacopo Chiggiato;Jacopo Chiggiato

  • The North Atlantic Waveguide and Downstream Impact Experiment

    Andreas Schäfler;George Craig;Heini Wernli;Philippe Arbogast

  • February 2003 marine atmospheric conditions and the bora over the northern Adriatic

    Clive Dorman;Clive Dorman;Sandro Carniel;Luigi Cavaleri;Mauro Sclavo

  • The extratropical transition of tropical cyclones. Part I: Cyclone evolution and direct impacts

    Clark Evans;Kimberly M. Wood;Sim D. Aberson;Heather M. Archambault

  • The Regional Ocean Modeling System (ROMS) 4-dimensional variational data assimilation systems: Part II – Performance and application to the California Current System

    Andrew M. Moore;Hernan G. Arango;Gregoire Broquet;Chris Edwards

  • The Influence of Mesoscale Orography on a Coastal Jet and Rainband

    James D. Doyle

  • Sources and dynamics of turbulence in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere: A review

    R. D. Sharman;S. B. Trier;T. P. Lane;J. D. Doyle

  • An Intercomparison of Model-Predicted Wave Breaking for the 11 January 1972 Boulder Windstorm

    J. D. Doyle;D. R. Durran;C. Chen;B. A. Colle

  • Orographic precipitation and air mass transformation: An Alpine example

    Ronald B. Smith;Qingfang Jiang;Matthew G. Fearon;Pierre Tabary

  • The Coupled Ocean/Atmosphere Mesoscale Prediction System (COAMPS)

    Richard M. Hodur;Xiaodong Hong;James D. Doyle;Julie Pullen

  • The Regional Ocean Modeling System (ROMS) 4-dimensional variational data assimilation systems Part III - Observation impact and observation sensitivity in the California Current System

    Andrew M. Moore;Hernan G. Arango;Gregoire Broquet;Chris Edwards

  • Large-Amplitude Mountain Wave Breaking over Greenland

    James D. Doyle;Melvyn A. Shapiro;Qingfang Jiang;Diana L. Bartels

  • Mountain Waves over Mont Blanc: Influence of a Stagnant Boundary Layer.

    Ronald B. Smith;Steven Skubis;James D. Doyle;Adrian S. Broad

  • Parameterization of the atmospheric boundary layer: A View from just above the inversion

    J. Teixeira;Bjorn Stevens;Bjorn Stevens;C. S. Bretherton;R. Cederwall

  • A central California coastal ocean modeling study: 1. Forward model and the influence of realistic versus climatological forcing

    M. Veneziani;C. A. Edwards;J. D. Doyle;D. Foley

  • Application of 4D-Variational data assimilation to the California Current System

    G. Broquet;C.A. Edwards;A.M. Moore;B.S. Powell

Frequent Co-Authors

Ronald B. Smith
Ronald B. Smith Yale University
Stephen D. Eckermann
Stephen D. Eckermann United States Naval Research Laboratory
Andreas Dörnbrack
Andreas Dörnbrack German Aerospace Center
Richard P. Signell
Richard P. Signell United States Geological Survey
Michael J. Taylor
Michael J. Taylor Utah State University
David C. Fritts
David C. Fritts G & A Technical Software (United States)
Markus Rapp
Markus Rapp German Aerospace Center
Craig M. Lee
Craig M. Lee University of Washington
Melvyn A. Shapiro
Melvyn A. Shapiro National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Jacopo Chiggiato
Jacopo Chiggiato National Research Council (CNR)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, expanding your qualifications with related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Many learners start with an affordable online general studies degree to build a broad knowledge base while managing costs effectively.

If you're seeking a degree that balances workload and accessibility, exploring what is the easiest bachelor's degree to get can guide you towards programs that fit your academic strengths and lifestyle.

For specialization within environmental fields, an online geology online degree is highly relevant. It offers insights into earth systems, environmental processes, and resource management, which complement environmental science expertise.

Additionally, a geographic information systems degree equips students with cutting-edge skills in spatial analysis and mapping, increasingly important in environmental research and policy-making.

Together, these pathways provide flexible, accessible options to deepen your knowledge and enhance your career prospects in the ever-evolving environmental sector.

Best Scientists Citing James D. Doyle

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles