World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
61
Citations
11323
World Ranking
2817
National Ranking
1118

Stephen D. Eckermann publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen D. Eckermann sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 225 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Stephen D. Eckermann D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen D. Eckermann sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stephen D. Eckermann is affiliated with the United States Naval Research Laboratory in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences and Physics and Astronomy, with a significant body of work intersecting various subfields.

Their published work spans several subfields of study, including:

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Oceanography
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Geophysics

The main topics covered in their research comprise:

  • Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
  • Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
  • Climate variability and models
  • Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing
  • Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes

Their recent papers include the following:

  • Mesospheric Bore Evolution and Instability Dynamics Observed in PMC Turbo Imaging and Rayleigh Lidar Profiling Over Northeastern Canada on 13 July 2018, 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Determining Gravity Wave Sources and Propagation in the Southern Hemisphere by Ray-Tracing AIRS Measurements, 2020, Geophysical Research Letters
  • The Role of Inertial Instability in Cross-Hemispheric Coupling, 2021, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
  • Stratospheric Gravity Waves Excited by a Propagating Rossby Wave Train-A DEEPWAVE Case Study, 2021, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
  • Gravity Wave Breaking and Vortex Ring Formation Observed by PMC Turbo, 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres

Stephen D. Eckermann frequently collaborates with several coauthors, notably:

  • Dave Broutman
  • Harold Knight
  • C. B. Kjellstrand
  • B. P. Williams
  • Cory Barton

The researcher's publications have appeared in prominent journals including:

  • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
  • Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics
  • Monthly Weather Review

Best Publications

  • Recent developments in gravity-wave effects in climate models and the global distribution of gravity-wave momentum flux from observations and models

    M. J. Alexander;M. Geller;C. McLandress;S. Polavarapu

  • An overview of the past, present and future of gravity-wave drag parametrization for numerical climate and weather prediction models

    Young‐Joon Kim;Stephen D. Eckermann;Hye‐Yeong Chun

  • Global Measurements of Stratospheric Mountain Waves from Space

    Stephen D Eckermann;Peter Preusse

  • The Navy Global Environmental Model

    Timothy Hogan;Ming Liu;James Ridout;Melinda Peng

  • A three-dimensional nonhydrostatic ray-tracing model for gravity waves : formulation and preliminary results for the middle atmosphere

    Crispin J. Marks;Stephen D. Eckermann

  • Space-based measurements of stratospheric mountain waves by CRISTA 1. Sensitivity, analysis method, and a case study

    Peter Preusse;Andreas Dörnbrack;Stephen D. Eckermann;Martin Riese

  • The deep propagating gravity wave experiment (deepwave): an airborne and ground-based exploration of gravity wave propagation and effects from their sources throughout the lower and middle atmosphere

    David C. Fritts;Ronald B. Smith;Michael J. Taylor;James D. Doyle

  • The predictability of the extratropical stratosphere on monthly time‐scales and its impact on the skill of tropospheric forecasts

    Om P. Tripathi;Mark Baldwin;Andrew Charlton-Perez;Martin Charron

  • Gravity wave and equatorial wave morphology of the stratosphere derived from long‐term rocket soundings

    Stephen D. Eckermann;Isamu Hirota;Wayne K. Hocking

  • Stratospheric horizontal wavenumber spectra of winds, potential temperature, and atmospheric tracers observed by high-altitude aircraft

    Julio T. Bacmeister;Stephen D. Eckermann;Paul A. Newman;Leslie Lait

  • Global Gravity Wave Variances from Aura MLS: Characteristics and Interpretation

    Dong L. Wu;Stephen D. Eckermann

  • Case studies of the mesospheric response to recent minor, major, and extended stratospheric warmings

    David. E. Siskind;Stephen. D. Eckermann;John P. McCormack;Larry Coy

  • Transparency of the atmosphere to short horizontal wavelength gravity waves

    Peter Preusse;Stephen D. Eckermann;Manfred Ern

  • Global Ray Tracing Simulations of the SABER Gravity Wave Climatology

    Peter Preusse;Stephen D. Eckermann;Manfred Ern;Jens Oberheide

  • Geographical distribution and interseasonal variability of tropical deep convection: UARS MLS observations and analyses

    Jonathan H. Jiang;Bin Wang;Kenshi Goya;Klemens Hocke

  • Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (UARS) MLS observation of mountain waves over the Andes

    Jonathan H. Jiang;Dong L. Wu;Stephen D. Eckermann

  • Remote sounding of atmospheric gravity waves with satellite limb and nadir techniques

    Dong L. Wu;Peter Preusse;Stephen D. Eckermann;Jonathan H. Jiang

  • High-altitude data assimilation system experiments for the northern summer mesosphere season of 2007

    Stephen D. Eckermann;Karl W. Hoppel;Lawrence Coy;John P. McCormack

  • On Recent Interannual Variability of the Arctic Winter Mesosphere: Implications for Tracer Descent

    David E. Siskind;Stephen D. Eckermann;Lawrence Coy;John P. McCormack

  • Intraseasonal wind variability in the equatorial mesosphere and lower thermosphere: long-term observations from the central Pacific

    Stephen D Eckermann;Deepak K Rajopadhyaya;Deepak K Rajopadhyaya;Robert A Vincent

  • Widespread solid particle formation by mountain waves in the Arctic stratosphere

    Kenneth S. Carslaw;Thomas Peter;Julio T. Bacmeister;Stephen D. Eckermann

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Preusse
Peter Preusse Forschungszentrum Jülich
Lawrence Coy
Lawrence Coy Goddard Space Flight Center
Karl W. Hoppel
Karl W. Hoppel United States Naval Research Laboratory
James D. Doyle
James D. Doyle United States Naval Research Laboratory
Markus Rapp
Markus Rapp German Aerospace Center
Martin Riese
Martin Riese Forschungszentrum Jülich
David E. Siskind
David E. Siskind United States Naval Research Laboratory
Michael J. Taylor
Michael J. Taylor Utah State University
Dong L. Wu
Dong L. Wu Goddard Space Flight Center
Andreas Dörnbrack
Andreas Dörnbrack German Aerospace Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students passionate about Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Public administration plays a crucial role in environmental policy and resource management. Programs like the best online masters in public administration offer focused training to help graduates influence policy and lead sustainability initiatives effectively.

Understanding the social dynamics behind environmental issues is equally important. Pursuing an accredited online bachelors in sociology provides essential insights into human behavior and societal impacts, which are key to driving community-based environmental solutions.

For those interested in advancing their expertise without the traditional dissertation barrier, online edd programs no dissertation offer flexible doctoral pathways. These programs emphasize practical research and leadership in educational and environmental settings.

Additionally, transitioning from an EdS to EdD degree via eds to edd programs online provides a streamlined approach for educators and administrators aiming to expand their impact on environmental education and policy, combining leadership with scientific expertise.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen D. Eckermann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles