World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
51
Citations
8511
World Ranking
4793
National Ranking
1767

David E. Siskind publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David E. Siskind sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 220 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

David E. Siskind D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David E. Siskind sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

David E. Siskind is affiliated with the United States Naval Research Laboratory in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Physics and Astronomy as well as Earth and Planetary Sciences. Within these domains, their work extensively covers subfields such as Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, and Oceanography.

The main topics addressed in their research include Atmospheric Ozone and Climate, Ionosphere and Magnetosphere Dynamics, Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics, Atmospheric Chemistry and Aerosols, Astro and Planetary Science, Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, and Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations.

David E. Siskind has contributed to multiple publications, with frequent appearances in various scientific venues. Notable publication venues where their work has appeared include:

  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
  • Earth and Space Science
  • Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics
  • Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences

Some of their recent papers are:

  • NRLMSIS 2.0: A Whole-Atmosphere Empirical Model of Temperature and Neutral Species Densities (2020), Earth and Space Science
  • NRLMSIS 2.1: An Empirical Model of Nitric Oxide Incorporated Into MSIS (2022), Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
  • Trends in the Polar Summer Mesosphere Temperature and Pressure Altitude from Satellite Observations (2021), Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics
  • Coupling From the Middle Atmosphere to the Exobase: Dynamical Disturbance Effects on Light Chemical Species (2020), Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
  • The Role of Vertically and Obliquely Propagating Gravity Waves in Influencing the Polar Summer Mesosphere (2020), Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres

David E. Siskind has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • S. M. Bailey
  • C. E. Randall
  • McArthur Jones
  • Mark E. Hervig
  • D. P. Drob

Best Publications

  • NRLMSIS 2.0: A Whole-Atmosphere Empirical Model of Temperature and Neutral Species Densities

    J. T. Emmert;D. P. Drob;J. M. Picone;D. E. Siskind

  • Loss of the Martian atmosphere to space: Present-day loss rates determined from MAVEN observations and integrated loss through time

    Bruce Jakosky;David Brain;Michael Chaffin;Shannon M. Curry

  • The Aeronomy of Ice in the Mesosphere (AIM) mission: Overview and early science results

    James M. Russell;Scott M. Bailey;Larry L. Gordley;David W. Rusch

  • NOx descent in the Arctic middle atmosphere in early 2009

    C. E. Randall;V. L. Harvey;D. E. Siskind

  • Case studies of the mesospheric response to recent minor, major, and extended stratospheric warmings

    David. E. Siskind;Stephen. D. Eckermann;John P. McCormack;Larry Coy

  • Ground-based microwave observations of ozone in the upper stratosphere and mesosphere

    Brian J. Connor;David E. Siskind;J. J. Tsou;Alan Parrish

  • Implications of Satellite OH Observations for Middle Atmospheric H2O and Ozone

    M. E. Summers;R. R. Conway;D. E. Siskind;M. H. Stevens

  • High-altitude data assimilation system experiments for the northern summer mesosphere season of 2007

    Stephen D. Eckermann;Karl W. Hoppel;Lawrence Coy;John P. McCormack

  • On Recent Interannual Variability of the Arctic Winter Mesosphere: Implications for Tracer Descent

    David E. Siskind;Stephen D. Eckermann;Lawrence Coy;John P. McCormack

  • Increases in middle atmospheric water vapor as observed by the Halogen Occultation Experiment and the ground-based Water Vapor Millimeter-Wave Spectrometer from 1991 to 1997

    Gerald E. Nedoluha;Richard M. Bevilacqua;R. Michael Gomez;David E. Siskind

  • Solar‐terrestrial coupling: Low‐latitude thermospheric nitric oxide

    Charles A. Barth;W. Kent Tobiska;David E. Siskind;David D. Cleary

  • The response of thermospheric nitric oxide to an auroral storm 1. Low and middle latitudes

    D. E. Siskind;C. A. Barth;R. G. Roble

  • Observations of stratospheric warmings and mesospheric coolings by the TIMED SABER instrument

    D. E. Siskind;L. Coy;P. Espy

  • Global and temporal distribution of meteoric smoke : a two-dimensional simulation study

    Linda Megner;D. E. Siskind;M. Rapp;J. Gumbel

  • Atomic oxygen in the mesosphere and lower thermosphere derived from SABER: Algorithm theoretical basis and measurement uncertainty

    Martin G. Mlynczak;Linda A. Hunt;Jeffrey C. Mast;B. Thomas Marshall

  • Decadal and inter-hemispheric variability in polar mesospheric clouds, water vapor, and temperature

    Mark Hervig;Dave Siskind

  • The possible effect of solar soft X rays on thermospheric nitric oxide

    D. E. Siskind;C. A. Barth;D. D. Cleary

  • First Satellite Observations of Meteoric Smoke in the Middle Atmosphere

    Mark E. Hervig;Larry L. Gordley;Lance E. Deaver;David E. Siskind

  • A new calculation of nitric oxide photolysis in the stratosphere, mesosphere, and lower thermosphere

    K. Minschwaner;D. E. Siskind

  • An assessment of southern hemisphere stratospheric NOx enhancements due to transport from the upper atmosphere

    D. E. Siskind;G. E. Nedoluha;C. E. Randall;M. Fromm

Frequent Co-Authors

James M. Russell
James M. Russell Brown University
Mark E. Hervig
Mark E. Hervig University of Wyoming
Cora E. Randall
Cora E. Randall University of Colorado Boulder
Scott M. Bailey
Scott M. Bailey Virginia Tech
Larry L. Gordley
Larry L. Gordley Langley Research Center
Stephen D. Eckermann
Stephen D. Eckermann United States Naval Research Laboratory
Michael E. Summers
Michael E. Summers George Mason University
Karl W. Hoppel
Karl W. Hoppel United States Naval Research Laboratory
Lawrence Coy
Lawrence Coy Goddard Space Flight Center
Fabrizio Sassi
Fabrizio Sassi United States Naval Research Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can broaden career options and provide specialized skills. Those seeking flexible and affordable options might consider a budget friendly online general studies degree, which offers foundational knowledge while keeping costs low.

If you’re looking for a less intensive pathway to enter environmental fields, understanding what is the easiest bachelor's degree to get can help you make informed decisions about program difficulty and time commitment.

More specialized degrees like an online geology program are well-suited for those fascinated by Earth's processes. The geology online degree provides technical expertise crucial for careers in natural resource management or environmental consulting.

Additionally, studying Geographic Information Systems (GIS) is a strategic choice in environmental sciences. The best gis graduate programs equip students with spatial analysis skills essential for habitat mapping, climate studies, and urban planning.

Best Scientists Citing David E. Siskind

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles