World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 53 2228 2025 89 84 165 20797

Philipp D. Koellinger publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Philipp D. Koellinger between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Philipp D. Koellinger published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 9.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2013. 23 of the 191 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2013. 2005: 2 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 20 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 9 publications
2005 2025

191 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Philipp D. Koellinger: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 2
2006 0
2007 2
2008 6
2009 7
2010 5
2011 8
2012 11
2013 20
2014 7
2015 10
2016 17
2017 14
2018 11
2019 13
2020 6
2021 16
2022 6
2023 7
2024 14
2025 9
Total 191
Download as CSV

Philipp D. Koellinger publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philipp D. Koellinger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 164–173 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 165 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391 165
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Philipp D. Koellinger D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philipp D. Koellinger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141 53
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Philipp D. Koellinger is affiliated with Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research primarily spans the fields of biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a specific focus on genetics. The scientist's work also intersects with molecular biology, experimental and cognitive psychology, cognitive neuroscience, and aspects of pediatrics, perinatology, and child health.

Key topics within their research portfolio include genetic associations and epidemiology, cognitive abilities and testing, functional brain connectivity studies, birth, development, and health, epigenetics and DNA methylation, genetic mapping and diversity in plants and animals, and advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications.

Their publication record includes recent papers such as:

  • "Within-sibship genome-wide association analyses decrease bias in estimates of direct genetic effects" (2022, Nature Genetics)
  • "Multivariate analysis of 1.5 million people identifies genetic associations with traits related to self-regulation and addiction" (2021, Nature Neuroscience)
  • "The default network of the human brain is associated with perceived social isolation" (2020, Nature Communications)
  • "Associations between alcohol consumption and gray and white matter volumes in the UK Biobank" (2022, Nature Communications)
  • "Using genetics for social science" (2020, Nature Human Behaviour)

Philipp D. Koellinger frequently collaborates with several researchers, including:

  • K. Paige Harden
  • Richard Karlsson Linnér
  • Elliot M. Tucker-Drob
  • Hyeokmoon Kweon
  • Travis T. Mallard

Their publications are often found in venues such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nature Human Behaviour
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Nature Communications
  • European Neuropsychopharmacology

Best Publications

  • Gene discovery and polygenic prediction from a genome-wide association study of educational attainment in 1.1 million individuals

    James J. Lee;Robbee Wedow;Aysu Okbay;Edward Kong

  • Genome-wide association study identifies 74 loci associated with educational attainment

    Aysu Okbay;Jonathan P. Beauchamp;Mark Alan Fontana;James J. Lee

  • "I think I can, I think I can": Overconfidence and entrepreneurial behavior

    Philipp Koellinger;Maria Minniti;Christian Schade

  • Genetic variants associated with subjective well-being, depressive symptoms, and neuroticism identified through genome-wide analyses

    Aysu Okbay;Bart M L Baselmans;Jan-Emmanuel De Neve;Patrick Turley

  • GWAS of 126,559 Individuals Identifies Genetic Variants Associated with Educational Attainment

    Cornelius A. Rietveld;Sarah E. Medland;Jaime Lane Derringer;Jian Yang

  • Genomic structural equation modelling provides insights into the multivariate genetic architecture of complex traits.

    Andrew D. Grotzinger;Mijke Rhemtulla;Ronald de Vlaming;Ronald de Vlaming;Stuart J. Ritchie

  • Genome-wide association analyses of risk tolerance and risky behaviors in over 1 million individuals identify hundreds of loci and shared genetic influences

    Richard Karlsson Linnér;Richard Karlsson Linnér;Pietro Biroli;Edward Kong;S. Fleur W. Meddens;S. Fleur W. Meddens

  • The relationship between technology, innovation, and firm performance-Empirical evidence from e-business in Europe

    Philipp Koellinger

  • Entrepreneurship and the Business Cycle

    Philipp D. Koellinger;A. Roy Thurik

  • Polygenic risk scores for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder predict creativity

    Robert A Power;Stacy Steinberg;Gyda Bjornsdottir;Cornelius A Rietveld

  • Genome-wide association meta-analysis of 78,308 individuals identifies new loci and genes influencing human intelligence

    Suzanne Sniekers;Sven Stringer;Kyoko Watanabe;Philip R Jansen;Philip R Jansen

  • Gender Differences in Entrepreneurial Propensity

    Philipp Koellinger;Maria Minniti;Christian Schade

  • Why are some entrepreneurs more innovative than others

    Philipp Koellinger

  • I Can’t Get No Satisfaction - Necessity Entrepreneurship and Procedural Utility

    Joern Block;Philipp Koellinger

  • The Genetic Architecture of Economic and Political Preferences

    Daniel J. Benjamin;David Cesarini;David Cesarini;Matthijs J. H. M. van der Loos;Christopher T. Dawes

  • Genome-wide analysis identifies 12 loci influencing human reproductive behavior

    Nicola Barban;Rick Jansen;Ronald De Vlaming;Ahmad Vaez;Ahmad Vaez

  • Common genetic variants associated with cognitive performance identified using the proxy-phenotype method

    Cornelius A Rietveld;Tõnu Esko;Gail Davies;Tune H Pers

  • Multivariate analysis of 1.5 million people identifies genetic associations with traits related to self-regulation and addiction.

    Richard Karlsson Linnér;Travis T Mallard;Peter B Barr;Sandra Sanchez-Roige;Sandra Sanchez-Roige

  • The default network of the human brain is associated with perceived social isolation

    R. Nathan Spreng;Emile Dimas;Laetitia Mwilambwe-Tshilobo;Alain Dagher

  • Genome-wide association meta- Analysis of 78,308 individuals identifies new loci and genes influencing human intelligence

    S. Sniekers;S. Stringer;K. Watanabe;P.R. Jansen

  • Genome-wide association study results for educational attainment aid in identifying genetic heterogeneity of schizophrenia

    Vikas Bansal;Marina Mitjans;C.A.P. Burik;C.A.P. Burik;R.K. Linnér;R.K. Linnér

  • Genome-wide association study identifies 74 loci associated with educational attainment

    Aysu Okbay;Jonathan P. Beauchamp;Mark Alan Fontana;James J. Lee

  • Genetic variants associated with subjective well-being, depressive symptoms, and neuroticism identified through genome-wide analyses

    Aysu Okbay;Bart M. L. Baselmans;Jan-Emmanuel De Neve;Patrick Turley

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel J. Benjamin
Daniel J. Benjamin University of California, Los Angeles
David Cesarini
David Cesarini New York University
Magnus Johannesson
Magnus Johannesson Stockholm School of Economics
Patrik K. E. Magnusson
Patrik K. E. Magnusson Karolinska Institute
Roy Thurik
Roy Thurik Montpellier Business School
Albert Hofman
Albert Hofman Harvard University
Tonu Esko
Tonu Esko University of Tartu
André G. Uitterlinden
André G. Uitterlinden Erasmus University Rotterdam
David Laibson
David Laibson Harvard University
Henning Tiemeier
Henning Tiemeier Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Thinking about expanding your career opportunities in Social Sciences or Humanities? Online degrees now offer more flexibility and affordability than ever. If you’re considering a career in social work, there are several cheapest online msw programs available that fit different budgets, making it easier to balance costs while gaining crucial qualifications.

For those interested in specialized fields, earning your bcba certification online can open doors in behavioral analysis, helping you secure roles in schools, hospitals, and community organizations. If time is of the essence, accelerated options like a social work accelerated program or accelerated psychology programs online can allow you to finish your degree faster and transition quickly into the workforce.

With these pathways, students can benefit from flexible schedules, lower costs, and diverse career routes—whether in counseling, education, policy, or research. Choosing the right online program is a key step toward reaching your professional and academic goals in the dynamic fields of Social Sciences and Humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Philipp D. Koellinger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles