World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 67 358 335 25 25 279 23122
Economics and Finance 67 535 480 17 16 278 23122

Jeong-Bon Kim publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jeong-Bon Kim between 1991 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jeong-Bon Kim published across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025, averaging 9.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2019. 28 of the 322 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 2019. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 3 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 21 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 19 publications 2019: 30 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 16 publications
1991 2025

322 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jeong-Bon Kim: publications per year, 1991 to 2025
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 1
1993 1
1994 3
1995 3
1996 4
1997 3
1998 3
1999 2
2000 3
2001 2
2002 3
2003 3
2004 4
2005 3
2006 2
2007 10
2008 4
2009 8
2010 8
2011 15
2012 14
2013 17
2014 21
2015 14
2016 17
2017 12
2018 19
2019 30
2020 15
2021 19
2022 16
2023 14
2024 12
2025 16
Total 322
Download as CSV

Jeong-Bon Kim publications per year - data summary

  • Jeong-Bon Kim, a Business and Management scholar from City University of Hong Kong, has 322 publications recorded across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1991 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2019, with 30 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1991, 1992 and 1993, with 1 publication each.
  • The rate of publication averages 9.2 papers per year over the whole span, or 9.2 per year counting only the 35 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 77 publications, 24% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1991-2002: 29 publications (2.4 per year); 2003-2014: 109 publications (9.1 per year); 2015-2025: 184 publications (16.7 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Jeong-Bon Kim publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeong-Bon Kim sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 275–279 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 279 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12 279
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Jeong-Bon Kim publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 3,017 Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 82 ranges running from 35–39 to 436+ publications.
  • Jeong-Bon Kim, a Business and Management scholar from City University of Hong Kong, records 279 publications - the 90th percentile of the discipline.
  • 90% of ranked Business and Management scientists score the same or lower than Jeong-Bon Kim, and about 10% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 135–139 publications range, and Jeong-Bon Kim ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 95–99 publications, holding 122 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 52% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 135–139 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 436 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Jeong-Bon Kim D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeong-Bon Kim sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 67 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18 67
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Jeong-Bon Kim D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 3,017 Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 60 ranges running from 30 to 89+ D-Index.
  • Jeong-Bon Kim, a Business and Management scholar from City University of Hong Kong, records 67 D-Index - the 88th percentile of the discipline.
  • 88% of ranked Business and Management scientists score the same or lower than Jeong-Bon Kim, and about 12% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 42 D-Index range, and Jeong-Bon Kim ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32 D-Index, holding 171 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 44 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more, 96 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Overview

Jeong-Bon Kim is affiliated with City University of Hong Kong in China. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Business, Management and Accounting, and Economics, Econometrics and Finance, with a substantial emphasis on Accounting and Finance subfields.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics including Corporate Finance and Governance, Auditing, Earnings Management, and Governance, Financial Markets and Investment Strategies, Banking stability, regulation, and efficiency, Financial Reporting and Valuation Research, Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting, and Credit Risk and Financial Regulations.

Jeong-Bon Kim has published multiple papers in various academic journals. Recent publications include:

  • The real effects of risk disclosures: evidence from climate change reporting in 10-Ks (2022), Review of Accounting Studies
  • Does unionization affect the manager-shareholder conflict? Evidence from firm-specific stock price crash risk (2021), Journal of Corporate Finance
  • Financial statement comparability and managers' use of corporate resources (2020), Accounting and Finance

Although some recent papers listed are co-authored with other researchers beyond Jeong-Bon Kim, the scientist frequently collaborates with:

  • Louise Yi Lu
  • Yangxin Yu
  • Jay Junghun Lee
  • Shushu Liao
  • Yangke Liu

In terms of publication venues, Jeong-Bon Kim has been frequently published in:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal (25 publications)
  • Review of Accounting Studies (4 publications)
  • Accounting and Finance (4 publications)
  • Journal of Accounting and Public Policy (4 publications)
  • Journal of Business Finance & Accounting (4 publications)

Best Publications

  • Corporate tax avoidance and stock price crash risk: Firm-level analysis

    Jeong Bon Kim;Yinghua Li;Liandong Zhang

  • Ownership concentration, foreign shareholding, audit quality, and stock price synchronicity: Evidence from China

    Ferdinand A. Gul;Jeong-Bon Kim;Annie A. Qiu

  • CFOs versus CEOs: Equity incentives and crashes

    Jeong Bon Kim;Yinghua Li;Liandong Zhang

  • Institutional monitoring and opportunistic earnings management

    Richard Chung;Michael Firth;Jeong-Bon Kim

  • Audit Office Size, Audit Quality and Audit Pricing

    Jong-Hag Choi;Chansog (Francis) Kim;Jeong-Bon Kim;Yoonseok Zang

  • Accounting Conservatism and Stock Price Crash Risk: Firm‐level Evidence

    Jeong-Bon Kim;Liandong Zhang

  • Audit pricing, legal liability regimes, and big 4 premiums: Theory and cross-country evidence

    Jong-Hag Choi;Jeong-Bon Kim;Xiaohong Liu;Dan A. Simunic

  • Auditor Conservatism, Asymmetric Monitoring, and Earnings Management*

    Jeong-Bon Kim;Richard Chung;Michael Firth

  • CEO Overconfidence and Stock Price Crash Risk

    Jeong-Bon Kim;Zheng Wang;Liandong Zhang

  • Internal Control Weakness and Bank Loan Contracting: Evidence from SOX Section 404 Disclosures

    Jeong-Bon Kim;Byron Y. Song;Liandong Zhang

  • Earnings management, surplus free cash flow, and external monitoring

    Richard Chung;Michael Firth;Jeong-Bon Kim

  • Ownership Structure, Business Group Affiliation, Listing Status, and Earnings Management: Evidence from Korea*

    Jeong-Bon Kim;Cheong H. Yi

  • Voluntary Audits and the Cost of Debt Capital for Privately Held Firms: Korean Evidence*

    Jeong-Bon Kim;Dan A. Simunic;Michael T. Stein;Cheong H. Yi

  • Cross‐Listing Audit Fee Premiums: Theory and Evidence

    Jong‐Hag Choi;Jeong‐Bon Kim;Xiaohong Liu;Dan A. Simunic

  • Financial statement comparability and expected crash risk

    Jeong Bon Kim;Leye Li;Louise Yi Lu;Yangxin Yu

  • Financial reporting opacity and expected crash risk: Evidence from implied volatility smirks

    Jeong Bon Kim;Liandong Zhang

  • The Impact of Mandatory IFRS Adoption on Audit Fees: Theory and Evidence

    Jeong-Bon Kim;Xiaohong Liu;Liu Zheng

  • Geographic Proximity between Auditor and Client: How Does It Impact Audit Quality?

    Jong-Hag Choi;Jeong-Bon Kim;Annie A. Qiu;Yoonseok Zang

  • Do Abnormally High Audit Fees Impair Audit Quality

    Jong-Hag Choi;Jeong-Bon Kim;Yoonseok Zang

  • Real earnings management and cost of capital

    Jeong-Bon Kim;Byungcherl Charlie Sohn

  • Audit Pricing, Legal Liability Regimes, and Big 4 Premiums:Theory and Cross-Country Evidence

    Jong-Hag Choi;Xiaohong Liu;Jeong-Bon Kim;Dan A. Simunic

  • Ownership Structure, Business Group Affiliation, Listing Status, and Earnings Management: Evidence from Korea

    Cheong H. Yi;Jeong-Bon Kim

  • Audit Office Size, Audit Quality and Audit Pricing

    Jong-Hag Choi;Jeong-Bon Kim;Chansog Kim;Yoonseok Zang

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Firth
Michael Firth Lingnan University
Paul A. Griffin
Paul A. Griffin University of California, Davis
Bing Li
Bing Li Jiangsu University
Ferdinand A. Gul
Ferdinand A. Gul University of the Sunshine Coast
Oliver Zhen Li
Oliver Zhen Li National University of Singapore
Frank M. Song
Frank M. Song Wuhan University
Michel Magnan
Michel Magnan Concordia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your knowledge in business and management opens up a wide range of study and career options. For students seeking flexibility and speed, fast track college programs in the U.S. allow you to complete your degree quicker, helping you enter the workforce sooner.

If cost is a concern, there are many affordable online business degree options that combine quality education with budget-friendly tuition. As healthcare management grows in importance, aspiring professionals can also explore healthcare administration degree cost considerations to find programs that offer value and career potential.

For those looking to advance their expertise, an health administration degree at the master's level may lead to leadership roles in hospitals, clinics, or other healthcare organizations. Exploring these related programs can help you align your education with your career ambitions.

Best Scientists Citing Jeong-Bon Kim

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles