World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
49
Citations
8638
World Ranking
4049
National Ranking
1414

Olin E. Rhodes publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Olin E. Rhodes sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 201 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Olin E. Rhodes D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Olin E. Rhodes sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Olin E. Rhodes is affiliated with the University of Georgia in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with significant contributions to biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Rhodes' work encompasses various subfields, including ecology, molecular biology, genetics, pollution, and virology.

The scientist's main research topics include:

  • Wildlife ecology and conservation
  • Avian ecology and behavior
  • Rabies epidemiology and control
  • Gut microbiota and health
  • Genomics and phylogenetic studies
  • Wildlife-road interactions and conservation
  • Yersinia bacterium, plague, and ectoparasites research

Olin E. Rhodes has published extensively in scientific journals, with frequent appearances in the following venues:

  • Journal of Wildlife Management
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Applied Animal Behaviour Science
  • Scientific Reports

Some notable recent papers authored by Rhodes include:

  • "Co-occurrence of antibiotic, biocide, and heavy metal resistance genes in bacteria from metal and radionuclide contaminated soils at the Savannah River Site," 2020, Microbial Biotechnology
  • "Network structure of vertebrate scavenger assemblages at the global scale: drivers and ecosystem functioning implications," 2020, Ecography
  • "Functional traits driving species role in the structure of terrestrial vertebrate scavenger networks," 2021, Ecology
  • "Improved Microbial Community Characterization of 16S rRNA via Metagenome Hybridization Capture Enrichment," 2021, Frontiers in Microbiology
  • "Solving the sample size problem for resource selection functions," 2021, Methods in Ecology and Evolution

Rhodes collaborates frequently with several researchers, including:

  • James C. Beasley
  • Guha Dharmarajan
  • Travis L. DeVault
  • Richard B. Chipman
  • Amy T. Gilbert

Best Publications

  • Scavenging by vertebrates: behavioral, ecological, and evolutionary perspectives on an important energy transfer pathway in terrestrial ecosystems

    Travis L. DeVault;Olin E. Rhodes;John A. Shivik

  • Relative performance of Bayesian clustering software for inferring population substructure and individual assignment at low levels of population differentiation

    Emily K. Latch;Guha Dharmarajan;Jeffrey C. Glaubitz;Olin E. Rhodes

  • Population Dynamics in Ecological Space and Time

    Olin E. Rhodes;Ronald K. Chesser;Michael H. Smith

  • Factors influencing the acquisition of rodent carrion by vertebrate scavengers and decomposers

    Travis L DeVault;I Lehr Brisbin;Olin E Rhodes

  • Thirty polymorphic nuclear microsatellite loci from black walnut.

    K Woeste;R Burns;O Rhodes;C Michler

  • Effective Sizes for Subdivided Populations

    R K Chesser;O E Rhodes;D W Sugg;A Schnabel

  • Genetic homogeneity in Juglans nigra (Juglandaceae) at nuclear microsatellites

    Erin R. Victory;Jeffrey C. Glaubitz;Olin E. Rhodes;Keith E. Woeste

  • Abiotic and biotic factors modulate carrion fate and vertebrate scavenging communities

    Kelsey L. Turner;Erin F. Abernethy;L. Mike Conner;Olin E. Rhodes

  • Mesopredators dominate competition for carrion in an agricultural landscape

    Travis L. DeVault;Zachary H. Olson;James C. Beasley;Olin E. Rhodes;Olin E. Rhodes

  • A Hierarchical Analysis of Habitat Selection by Raccoons in Northern Indiana

    James C. Beasley;Travis L. Devault;Monica I. Retamosa;Olin E. Rhodes

  • Prospects for inferring pairwise relationships with single nucleotide polymorphisms

    Unknown

  • Genetic variation across the historical range of the wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo)

    Karen E. Mock;T. C. Theimer;O. E. Rhodes Jr.;D. L. Greenberg

  • Co-occurrence of antibiotic, biocide, and heavy metal resistance genes in bacteria from metal and radionuclide contaminated soils at the Savannah River Site.

    Jesse C. Thomas;Adelumola Oladeinde;Troy J. Kieran;John W. Finger

  • Species-wide phylogeography of North American mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus): cryptic glacial refugia and postglacial recolonization.

    Emily K. Latch;James R. Heffelfinger;Jennifer A. Fike;Olin E. Rhodes

  • Addressing ecological effects of radiation on populations and ecosystems to improve protection of the environment against radiation: Agreed statements from a Consensus Symposium

    Francois Bréchignac;Deborah Oughton;Claire Mays;Lawrence Barnthouse

  • Identification of vertebrate scavengers of small mammal carcasses in a forested landscape

    Travis L. DeVault;Olin E. Rhodes

  • Home-Range Attributes of Raccoons in a Fragmented Agricultural Region of Northern Indiana

    James C. Beasley;Travis L. Devault;Olin E. Rhodes

  • Assessing losses of genetic diversity due to translocation: long-term case histories in Merriam's turkey (Meleagris gallopavo merriami)

    Karen E. Mock;E.K. Latch;O.E. Rhodes

  • Scavenging in the Anthropocene: Human impact drives vertebrate scavenger species richness at a global scale.

    Esther Sebastián‐González;Jomar Magalhães Barbosa;Juan M. Pérez‐García;Juan M. Pérez‐García;Zebensui Morales‐Reyes

  • Carcass Type Affects Local Scavenger Guilds More than Habitat Connectivity

    Zachary H. Olson;James C. Beasley;Olin E. Rhodes

  • Microsatellite variation in the reintroduced Pennsylvania elk herd.

    Christen Lenney Williams;Thomas L. Serfass;Rawland Cogan;Olin E. Rhodes

  • Heterozygote deficiencies caused by a Wahlund effect: Dispelling unfounded expectations

    Guha Dharmarajan;William S. Beatty;Olin E. Rhodes

Frequent Co-Authors

James C. Beasley
James C. Beasley University of Georgia
Travis L. DeVault
Travis L. DeVault University of Georgia
Michael H. Smith
Michael H. Smith University of Georgia
Ronald K. Chesser
Ronald K. Chesser Texas Tech University
Travis C. Glenn
Travis C. Glenn University of Georgia
Loren M. Smith
Loren M. Smith Oklahoma State University
Robert K. Swihart
Robert K. Swihart Purdue University West Lafayette
Paul L. Leberg
Paul L. Leberg University of Louisiana at Lafayette
John C. Kilgo
John C. Kilgo US Forest Service
Kurt C. VerCauteren
Kurt C. VerCauteren United States Department of Agriculture

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution can open doors to a range of dynamic careers. Many professionals with a background in biological sciences pursue additional qualifications in healthcare, education, or research. Online nursing degrees, for example, provide accessible pathways to career advancement for those interested in applied science fields.

Programs such as rn to np programs online enable registered nurses to expand their credentials and move into advanced nurse practitioner roles. For individuals with non-nursing backgrounds interested in a healthcare career, online direct entry msn degrees offer fast-track options to enter the field.

Choosing the right program is important. Comparisons like capella vs wgu rn to bsn help prospective students evaluate factors such as cost, flexibility, and accreditation. Additionally, accessible rn to msn bridge programs allow current nurses to efficiently gain advanced degrees and boost career prospects.

Whether your interests align with ecology, evolution, or healthcare, online programs provide diverse opportunities to evolve your professional path.

Best Scientists Citing Olin E. Rhodes

Trending Scientists