World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 51 5141 4767 54 52 250 13397

Achim Elfering publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Achim Elfering between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Achim Elfering published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 11.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 33 publications in 2012. 8 of the 310 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 33. Peak 33 publications in 2012. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 24 publications 2011: 22 publications 2012: 33 publications 2013: 22 publications 2014: 22 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 6 publications
1998 2025

310 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Achim Elfering: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 0
2000 4
2001 0
2002 4
2003 3
2004 2
2005 6
2006 11
2007 8
2008 14
2009 10
2010 24
2011 22
2012 33
2013 22
2014 22
2015 16
2016 14
2017 16
2018 15
2019 9
2020 14
2021 19
2022 7
2023 6
2024 2
2025 6
Total 310
Download as CSV

Achim Elfering publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Achim Elfering sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 241–250 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 250 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196 250
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Achim Elfering D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Achim Elfering sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445 51
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Achim Elfering is affiliated with the University of Bern in Switzerland and has contributed extensively to the fields of medicine, health professions, and psychology. Their research focuses on musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation, workplace health and well-being, work-family balance challenges, and the impact of COVID-19 on mental health. Other notable areas include effects of vibration on health, job satisfaction and organizational behavior, as well as sleep and work-related fatigue.

Frequent coauthors in Achim Elfering's research include:

  • Andrea Martina Aegerter
  • Venerina Johnston
  • Markus Melloh
  • Gisela Sjøgaard
  • Thomas Volken

Major publication venues where their work frequently appears are:

  • European Spine Journal
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Sleep and Vigilance
  • BMC Public Health
  • BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Among recent papers authored or coauthored by Achim Elfering are:

  • How are social stressors at work related to well-being and health? A systematic review and meta-analysis, 2021, BMC Public Health
  • A systematic review of working conditions and occupational health in home office, 2022, Work
  • Increased Working From Home in Vocational Counseling Psychologists During COVID-19: Associated Change in Productivity and Job Satisfaction, 2021, Frontiers in Psychology
  • No evidence for an effect of working from home on neck pain and neck disability among Swiss office workers: Short-term impact of COVID-19, 2021, European Spine Journal
  • No Evidence for a Decrease in Physical Activity Among Swiss Office Workers During COVID-19: A Longitudinal Study, 2021, Frontiers in Psychology

Their research includes systematic reviews and longitudinal studies addressing the effects of social stressors at work, occupational health in remote work settings, productivity and job satisfaction changes during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as physical health outcomes related to work-from-home arrangements.

Best Publications

  • A meta-analysis of work-family conflict and various outcomes with a special emphasis on cross-domain versus matching-domain relations.

    Fabienne T. Amstad;Laurenz L. Meier;Ursula Fasel;Achim Elfering

  • Pain assessment

    Mathias Haefeli;Achim Elfering

  • Taking the chance: Core self-evaluations predict relative gain in job resources following turnover

    Achim Elfering;Achim Elfering;Anita Keller;Martial Berset;Martial Berset;Laurenz L. Meier

  • Illegitimate tasks as a source of work stress

    Norbert K. Semmer;Nicola Jacobshagen;Laurenz L. Meier;Achim Elfering

  • The emotional meaning of instrumental social support

    Norbert K. Semmer;Achim Elfering;Nicola Jacobshagen;Tanja Perrot

  • Occupational stress research: The Stress-As-Offense-To-Self Perspective

    Norbert Semmer;Nicola Jacobshagen;Laurenz Meier;Achim Elfering

  • Working conditions, well-being, and job-related attitudes among call centre agents

    Simone Grebner;Norbert K. Semmer;Luca Lo Faso;Stephan Gut

  • Natural history of individuals with asymptomatic disc abnormalities in magnetic resonance imaging : Predictors of low back pain-related medical consultation and work incapacity

    Norbert Boos;Norbert Semmer;Achim Elfering;Volker Schade

  • Outcome assessment in low back pain: how low can you go?

    Anne F. Mannion;Achim Elfering;Ralph Staerkle;Astrid Junge

  • The double meaning of control: three-way interactions between internal resources, job control, and stressors at work.

    Laurenz L. Meier;Norbert K. Semmer;Achim Elfering;Nicola Jacobshagen

  • Work stressors and impaired sleep: rumination as a mediator

    Martial Berset;Achim Elfering;Stefan Lüthy;Simon Lüthi

  • Working conditions and three types of well-being: a longitudinal study with self-report and rating data.

    Simone Grebner;Norbert K. Semmer;Achim Elfering

  • BEYOND SELF-REPORT: USING OBSERVATIONAL, PHYSIOLOGICAL, AND SITUATION-BASED MEASURES IN RESEARCH ON OCCUPATIONAL STRESS

    Norbert K Semmer;Simone Grebner;Achim Elfering

  • Predictors of surgical outcome and their assessment

    Anne F. Mannion;Achim Elfering

  • Work stress and patient safety: observer-rated work stressors as predictors of characteristics of safety-related events reported by young nurses.

    Achim Elfering;Norbert Semmer;Simone Grebner

  • Great expectations: really the novel predictor of outcome after spinal surgery?

    Anne F. Mannion;Astrid Junge;Achim Elfering;Jiri Dvorak

  • You want me to do what? Two daily diary studies of illegitimate tasks and employee well‐being

    Erin M. Eatough;Laurenz L. Meier;Ivana Igic;Achim Elfering

  • Effect of aging and degeneration on disc volume and shape: A quantitative study in asymptomatic volunteers

    Christian W. A. Pfirrmann;Alexander Metzdorf;Achim Elfering;Juerg Hodler

  • Identification of prognostic factors for chronicity in patients with low back pain: a review of screening instruments

    Markus Melloh;A. Elfering;C. Egli Presland;C. Roeder

  • Chronic job stressors and job control: Effects on event‐related coping success and well‐being

    Achim Elfering;Simone Grebner;Norbert K. Semmer;Dora Kaiser-Freiburghaus

  • Predictors of multidimensional outcome after spinal surgery

    Anne Mannion;Achim Elfering;Ralph Staerkle;Astrid Junge

Frequent Co-Authors

Norbert K. Semmer
Norbert K. Semmer University of Bern
Anne F. Mannion
Anne F. Mannion Schulthess Clinic
Laurenz L. Meier
Laurenz L. Meier University of Neuchâtel
Terry A. Beehr
Terry A. Beehr Central Michigan University
Juerg Hodler
Juerg Hodler University of Zurich
Martin Grosse Holtforth
Martin Grosse Holtforth University of Bern
Astrid Junge
Astrid Junge Fédération Internationale de Football Association
Jiri Dvorak
Jiri Dvorak Schulthess Clinic
Oliver Distler
Oliver Distler University of Zurich
Alastair Gray
Alastair Gray University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology studies in the USA opens up diverse online degree options and rewarding career pathways. Many students start by considering affordability and location when choosing a degree, especially in fields like counseling or mental health support. Choosing an affordable program ensures manageable student debt while maintaining access to high-quality education.

Several U.S. cities offer cost-effective choices for aspiring counselors and psychologists. For example, students can explore affordable counseling programs in Saint Louis or look into the cheapest counseling programs in Saint Paul for budget-friendly options in the Midwest. On the West Coast, opportunities abound in California through the cheapest counseling programs in San Diego and in the Pacific Northwest via the cheapest counseling degrees in Seattle.

Graduates can pursue various roles, from school counseling to clinical practice, social work, or behavioral research. By comparing programs across different locations and price points, students gain the flexibility to chart their ideal psychology career path while managing costs effectively.

Best Scientists Citing Achim Elfering

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles