World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
63
Citations
14824
World Ranking
10182
National Ranking
778

Nicholas D. E. Greene publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicholas D. E. Greene sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 189 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Nicholas D. E. Greene D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicholas D. E. Greene sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nicholas D. E. Greene is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Medicine, with a focus on Molecular Biology, Rheumatology, Cell Biology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Genetics as key subfields.

The main topics addressed in Greene's work include Folate and B Vitamins Research, Pluripotent Stem Cells Research, Congenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery, Cellular Mechanics and Interactions, Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer, Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms, and Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy.

Greene has collaborated frequently with certain coauthors, including Andrew J. Copp (42 joint works), Gabriel L. Galea (23), Kit-Yi Leung (16), Eirini Maniou (14), and Abigail R. Marshall (13). Their work appears commonly in journals such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), EBioMedicine, Nature Communications, Disease Models & Mechanisms, and Healthcare Technology Letters.

Recent publications by Greene include the following papers:

  • Inositols: From Established Knowledge to Novel Approaches, 2021, International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Deficient or Excess Folic Acid Supply During Pregnancy Alter Cortical Neurodevelopment in Mouse Offspring, 2020, Cerebral Cortex
  • Integrin-Mediated Focal Anchorage Drives Epithelial Zippering during Mouse Neural Tube Closure, 2020, Developmental Cell
  • Mechanical properties measured by atomic force microscopy define health biomarkers in ageing C. elegans, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Breakthroughs in the Use of Inositols for Assisted Reproductive Treatment (ART), 2020, Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism

Best Publications

  • Metformin Retards Aging in C. elegans by Altering Microbial Folate and Methionine Metabolism

    Filipe Cabreiro;Catherine Au;Kit-Yi Leung;Nuria Vergara-Irigaray

  • The genetic basis of mammalian neurulation

    Andrew J. Copp;Nicholas D. E. Greene;Jennifer N. Murdoch

  • Neural tube defects: recent advances, unsolved questions, and controversies

    Andrew J Copp;Philip Stanier;Nicholas D E Greene

  • Neural tube defects.

    Nicholas D.E. Greene;Andrew J. Copp

  • Genetics and development of neural tube defects

    Andrew J Copp;Nicholas D E Greene

  • Neural tube closure: cellular, molecular and biomechanical mechanisms.

    Evanthia Nikolopoulou;Gabriel L. Galea;Ana Rolo;Nicholas D. E. Greene

  • Genetics of human neural tube defects

    Nicholas D.E. Greene;Philip Stanier;Andrew J. Copp

  • Convergent extension, planar-cell-polarity signalling and initiation of mouse neural tube closure.

    Patricia Ybot-Gonzalez;Dawn Savery;Dianne Gerrelli;Massimo Signore

  • Mutations in radial spoke head protein genes RSPH9 and RSPH4A cause primary ciliary dyskinesia with central-microtubular-pair abnormalities

    Victoria H. Castleman;Leila Romio;Rahul Chodhari;Robert A. Hirst

  • Neural tube defects--disorders of neurulation and related embryonic processes.

    Andrew J. Copp;Nicholas D. E. Greene

  • INOSITOL PREVENTS FOLATE-RESISTANT NEURAL TUBE DEFECTS IN THE MOUSE

    Nicholas D.E. Greene;Andrew J. Copp

  • In Vivo Genetic Ablation by Cre-Mediated Expression of Diphtheria Toxin Fragment A

    Anna Ivanova;Massimo Signore;Nadia Caro;Nicholas D.E. Greene

  • Development of the vertebrate central nervous system: formation of the neural tube

    Nicholas D. E. Greene;Andrew J. Copp

  • Targeted Disruption of the Cln3 Gene Provides a Mouse Model for Batten Disease

    Hannah M. Mitchison;David J. Bernard;Nicholas D.E. Greene;Jonathan D. Cooper

  • Host-Microbe Co-metabolism Dictates Cancer Drug Efficacy in C. elegans

    Timothy A. Scott;Leonor M. Quintaneiro;Leonor M. Quintaneiro;Povilas Norvaisas;Prudence P. Lui

  • Mutations in the planar cell polarity genes CELSR1 and SCRIB are associated with the severe neural tube defect craniorachischisis

    Alexis Robinson;Sarah Escuin;Kit Doudney;Michel Vekemans

  • Neural plate morphogenesis during mouse neurulation is regulated by antagonism of Bmp signalling.

    Patricia Ybot-Gonzalez;Carles Gaston-Massuet;Gemma Girdler;John Klingensmith

  • Mutations in ZMYND10, a Gene Essential for Proper Axonemal Assembly of Inner and Outer Dynein Arms in Humans and Flies, Cause Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia

    Daniel J. Moore;Alexandros Onoufriadis;Amelia Shoemark;Michael A. Simpson

  • Folic acid prevents exencephaly in Cited2 deficient mice

    Juan Pedro Martinez Barbera;Tristan A. Rodriguez;Nicholas D. E. Greene;Wolfgang J. Weninger

  • The genetic basis of mammalian neurulation

    Andrew Copp

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew J. Copp
Andrew J. Copp University College London
Philip Stanier
Philip Stanier University College London
Lyn S. Chitty
Lyn S. Chitty University College London
Hannah M. Mitchison
Hannah M. Mitchison University College London
Sara E. Mole
Sara E. Mole University College London
Robert L. Nussbaum
Robert L. Nussbaum University of California, San Francisco
Peter J. Scambler
Peter J. Scambler University College London
Rima Rozen
Rima Rozen McGill University
Patricia B. Munroe
Patricia B. Munroe Queen Mary University of London
Gudrun E. Moore
Gudrun E. Moore University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Advancing your studies in Biology and Biochemistry can open doors to diverse online degree programs and rewarding career paths. Many students look for flexible, accredited options that align with their professional goals, especially in healthcare, research, and management.

If you are interested in leadership roles within the health sector, consider exploring cahme accredited mha programs. These degrees equip you with skills to manage hospitals and healthcare organizations.

For those aiming to advance clinical practice, online programs provide alternatives such as online dnp programs without dissertation. These flexible options let you deepen your expertise without residency or clinical requirements.

Looking to move into high-level administration? online doctoral programs healthcare administration prepare you for executive positions in both public and private organizations.

Finally, those considering the pharmaceutical industry can benefit from online pharmd options, which provide comprehensive training for careers as licensed pharmacists.

With these online pathways, biology and biochemistry graduates can tailor their education to suit a range of dynamic and high-growth fields.

Best Scientists Citing Nicholas D. E. Greene

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles