World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Molecular Biology

D-Index
82
Citations
32902
World Ranking
920
National Ranking
487

Kathryn V. Anderson publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kathryn V. Anderson sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 564+

This scientist: 150 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

Kathryn V. Anderson D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kathryn V. Anderson sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kathryn V. Anderson is affiliated with Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with a strong focus on Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, and Genetics. Additional areas of study include Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, as well as Oncology.

Their work covers a range of topics, emphasizing:

  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Renal and related cancers
  • Hippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZ
  • Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases
  • Hedgehog Signaling Pathway Studies
  • Cancer Cells and Metastasis

Kathryn V. Anderson has contributed to several notable publications across diverse and influential venues. Frequent outlets for their research include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), eLife, The Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing, Psychology of Popular Media, and Nature.

Recent published papers include:

  • "Centrosome anchoring regulates progenitor properties and cortical formation" (2020, Nature)
  • "Sonic hedgehog signaling directs patterned cell remodeling during cranial neural tube closure" (2020, eLife)
  • "Centrioles control the capacity, but not the specificity, of cytotoxic T cell killing" (2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
  • "A ratchet-like apical constriction drives cell ingression during the mouse gastrulation EMT" (2023, eLife)
  • "β-Pix-dependent cellular protrusions propel collective mesoderm migration in the mouse embryo" (2020, Nature Communications)

Collaborations are a significant aspect of Anderson's research, with frequent co-authors including Anna-Katerina Hadjantonakis, Alexandra L. Joyner, Elizabeth Lacy, Eric Brooks, and Mohammed T. Islam. These collaborations illustrate a network of contributing researchers in related domains.

Best Publications

  • Dicer is essential for mouse development.

    Emily Bernstein;Sang Yong Kim;Michelle A Carmell;Michelle A Carmell;Elizabeth P Murchison

  • The primary cilium: a signalling centre during vertebrate development

    Sarah C. Goetz;Kathryn V. Anderson

  • Hedgehog signalling in the mouse requires intraflagellar transport proteins

    Danwei Huangfu;Aimin Liu;Aimin Liu;Andrew S. Rakeman;Andrew S. Rakeman;Noel S. Murcia

  • A CONSERVED SIGNALING PATHWAY: The Drosophila Toll-Dorsal Pathway

    Marcia P. Belvin;Kathryn V. Anderson

  • The graded response to Sonic Hedgehog depends on cilia architecture.

    Tamara Caspary;Christine E. Larkins;Kathryn V. Anderson

  • Establishment of dorsal-ventral polarity in the Drosophila embryo: Genetic studies on the role of the Toll gene product

    Kathryn V. Anderson;Gerd Jürgens;Christiane Nüsslein-Volhard

  • Cilia and Hedgehog responsiveness in the mouse.

    Danwei Huangfu;Kathryn V. Anderson

  • Toll signaling pathways in the innate immune response.

    Kathryn V Anderson

  • Establishment of dorsal-ventral polarity in the Drosophila embryo: the induction of polarity by the Toll gene product.

    Kathryn V. Anderson;Liselotte Bokla;Christiane Nüsslein-Volhard

  • Cilia and Developmental Signaling

    Jonathan T. Eggenschwiler;Kathryn V. Anderson

  • Requirement for a peptidoglycan recognition protein (PGRP) in Relish activation and antibacterial immune responses in Drosophila.

    Kwang Min Choe;Kwang Min Choe;Thomas Werner;Svenja Stöven;Dan Hultmark

  • Primary Cilia and Mammalian Hedgehog Signaling.

    Fiona Bangs;Kathryn V. Anderson

  • Signaling from Smo to Ci/Gli: conservation and divergence of Hedgehog pathways from Drosophila to vertebrates.

    Danwei Huangfu;Kathryn V. Anderson

  • Rab23 is an essential negative regulator of the mouse Sonic hedgehog signalling pathway

    Jonathan T. Eggenschwiler;Edward Espinoza;Kathryn V. Anderson

  • Drosophila: The Genetics of Innate Immune Recognition and Response

    Catherine A. Brennan;Kathryn V. Anderson

  • Regulated nuclear import of Rel proteins in the Drosophila immune response

    Louisa P. Wu;Kathryn V. Anderson

  • LDL-receptor-related protein 4 is crucial for formation of the neuromuscular junction.

    Scott D. Weatherbee;Kathryn V. Anderson;Lee A. Niswander

  • Information for the dorsal–ventral pattern of the Drosophila embryo is stored as maternal mRNA

    Kathryn V. Anderson;Christiane Nüsslein-Volhard

  • Dominant and recessive mutations define functional domains of Toll, a transmembrane protein required for dorsal-ventral polarity in the Drosophila embryo.

    D. S. Schneider;K. L. Hudson;Ting-Yin Lin;K. V. Anderson

  • The coiled-coil domain containing protein CCDC40 is essential for motile cilia function and left-right axis formation

    Anita Becker-Heck;Irene E Zohn;Irene E Zohn;Noriko Okabe;Andrew Pollock

Frequent Co-Authors

Lee Niswander
Lee Niswander University of Colorado Boulder
Scott Keeney
Scott Keeney Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Christopher E. Mason
Christopher E. Mason Cornell University
Song-Hai Shi
Song-Hai Shi Tsinghua University
Christopher D. Lima
Christopher D. Lima Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
José Baselga
José Baselga Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Stephen J. Elledge
Stephen J. Elledge Harvard University
Gregory J. Hannon
Gregory J. Hannon University of Cambridge
Robert Geisler
Robert Geisler Max Planck Society

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Molecular Biology opens doors to many interdisciplinary online degrees and career pathways. For those seeking trusted educational providers, a growing number of nonprofit online colleges offer science-related programs that emphasize quality and affordability.

Individuals with military backgrounds—or their families—may benefit from institutions recognized as the best online colleges for military, which provide tailored support and flexibility for service members pursuing biology or health sciences.

For those interested in the social dimensions of science, accredited social work masters programs online integrate biological and psychological insights, preparing graduates for impactful roles in healthcare and community organizations.

If you wish to complement your molecular biology background with additional expertise, consider accelerated psychology masters programs. These options allow students to swiftly gain skills applicable to research, counseling, and healthcare environments.

Best Scientists Citing Kathryn V. Anderson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles