World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Molecular Biology

D-Index
65
Citations
18274
World Ranking
1658
National Ranking
838

John B. Wallingford publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John B. Wallingford sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 564+

This scientist: 174 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

John B. Wallingford D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John B. Wallingford sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

Overview

John B. Wallingford is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with significant contributions to Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, and Genetics. Additional subfields include Biomedical Engineering and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience.

The main research topics addressed by Wallingford include:

  • Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
  • Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases
  • Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • RNA Research and Splicing
  • Protist diversity and phylogeny
  • Reproductive Biology and Fertility

Wallingford has published extensively, with frequent contributions to several venues. The most common publication venues include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Developmental Biology
  • eLife
  • Development
  • Molecular Biology of the Cell

Prominent recent papers by Wallingford cover a range of cell and developmental biology topics:

  • Functional partitioning of a liquid-like organelle during assembly of axonemal dyneins, 2020, eLife
  • Mechanical heterogeneity along single cell-cell junctions is driven by lateral clustering of cadherins during vertebrate axis elongation, 2021, eLife
  • Neural tube closure requires the endocytic receptor Lrp2 and its functional interaction with intracellular scaffolds, 2021, Development
  • Convergent extension requires adhesion-dependent biomechanical integration of cell crawling and junction contraction, 2022, Cell Reports
  • The developmental biology of kinesins, 2020, Developmental Biology

Wallingford has collaborated multiple times with several researchers, including:

  • Chanjae Lee
  • Edward M. Marcotte
  • Robert J. Huebner
  • Shinuo Weng
  • Ophelia Papoulas

Best Publications

  • Genome evolution in the allotetraploid frog Xenopus laevis

    Adam M. Session;Adam M. Session;Yoshinobu Uno;Taejoon Kwon;Taejoon Kwon;Jarrod A. Chapman

  • Dishevelled controls cell polarity during Xenopus gastrulation

    John B. Wallingford;Brian A. Rowning;Kevin M. Vogeli;Ute Rothbächer

  • Convergent Extension: The Molecular Control of Polarized Cell Movement during Embryonic Development

    John B Wallingford;Scott E Fraser;Richard M Harland

  • The developmental biology of Dishevelled: an enigmatic protein governing cell fate and cell polarity.

    John B. Wallingford;Raymond Habas

  • Panorama of ancient metazoan macromolecular complexes

    Cuihong Wan;Cuihong Wan;Blake Borgeson;Sadhna Phanse;Fan Tu

  • Planar cell polarity in development and disease

    Mitchell T. Butler;John B. Wallingford

  • Dishevelled controls apical docking and planar polarization of basal bodies in ciliated epithelial cells.

    Tae Joo Park;Brian J Mitchell;Philip B Abitua;Chris Kintner

  • The Continuing Challenge of Understanding, Preventing, and Treating Neural Tube Defects

    John B. Wallingford;Lee A. Niswander;Gary M. Shaw;Richard H. Finnell

  • Ciliogenesis defects in embryos lacking inturned or fuzzy function are associated with failure of planar cell polarity and Hedgehog signaling

    Tae Joo Park;Saori L Haigo;John B Wallingford

  • Dishevelled genes mediate a conserved mammalian PCP pathway to regulate convergent extension during neurulation.

    Jianbo Wang;Natasha S. Hamblet;Sharayne Mark;Mary E. Dickinson

  • Wnt9b signaling regulates planar cell polarity and kidney tubule morphogenesis

    Courtney M. Karner;Rani Chirumamilla;Shigehisa Aoki;Shigehisa Aoki;Peter Igarashi

  • Planar Cell Polarity Acts Through Septins to Control Collective Cell Movement and Ciliogenesis

    Su Kyoung Kim;Asako Shindo;Tae Joo Park;Tae Joo Park;Edwin C. Oh

  • Shroom induces apical constriction and is required for hingepoint formation during neural tube closure.

    Saori L. Haigo;Jeffrey D. Hildebrand;Richard M. Harland;John B. Wallingford

  • Neural tube closure requires Dishevelled-dependent convergent extension of the midline.

    John B. Wallingford;Richard M. Harland

  • Systematic discovery of nonobvious human disease models through orthologous phenotypes

    Kriston L. McGary;Tae Joo Park;John O. Woods;Hye Ji Cha

  • Mutations in VANGL1 Associated with Neural-Tube Defects

    Zoha Kibar;Elena Torban;Jonathan R. McDearmid;Jonathan R. McDearmid;Annie Reynolds;Annie Reynolds

  • Multiciliated cells: a review

    Eric R. Brooks;John B. Wallingford

  • Strange as it may seem: the many links between Wnt signaling, planar cell polarity, and cilia

    John B. Wallingford;Brian Mitchell

  • PCP and septins compartmentalize cortical actomyosin to direct collective cell movement.

    Asako Shindo;John B. Wallingford

  • Planar cell polarity and the developmental control of cell behavior in vertebrate embryos.

    John B. Wallingford

Frequent Co-Authors

Edward M. Marcotte
Edward M. Marcotte The University of Texas at Austin
Richard H. Finnell
Richard H. Finnell Baylor College of Medicine
Richard M. Harland
Richard M. Harland University of California, Berkeley
Steven L. Brody
Steven L. Brody Washington University in St. Louis
Andrew J. Ewald
Andrew J. Ewald Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Scott E. Fraser
Scott E. Fraser University of Southern California
Friedhelm Hildebrandt
Friedhelm Hildebrandt Boston Children's Hospital
Brunella Franco
Brunella Franco University of Naples Federico II
Asao Fujiyama
Asao Fujiyama National Institute of Genetics
Laurence Faivre
Laurence Faivre University of Burgundy

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Molecular Biology in the USA can lead to an array of career opportunities across healthcare, biotechnology, research, and education. Many students consider complementary or alternative online degree programs to maximize their career prospects and flexibility.

Those with a military background might be interested in military friendly colleges online for tailored support and resources. If you are drawn to clinical or social development fields, lcsw online programs offer a recognized path to become a Licensed Clinical Social Worker, blending people-focused skills with scientific knowledge.

For those eager to advance quickly, some students pursue accelerated psychology masters programs to fast-track their expertise and career entry. Psychology dovetails with molecular biology in areas like neurobiology and behavioral genetics.

Additionally, an online masters in mental health counseling can open doors in healthcare and therapy, especially when combined with a science background. These pathways enhance both professional versatility and impact within the broader life sciences field.

Best Scientists Citing John B. Wallingford

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles