World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Laura E. Caulfield publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laura E. Caulfield sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Laura E. Caulfield D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laura E. Caulfield sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Laura E. Caulfield is affiliated with Johns Hopkins University in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on the fields of Medicine and Nursing, with a strong emphasis on Nutrition and Dietetics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Epidemiology, and Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health.

Their work covers a range of main research topics, including:

  • Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
  • Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
  • Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Birth, Development, and Health

Frequent publication venues for this scientist include:

  • Current Developments in Nutrition
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
  • Maternal and Child Nutrition
  • Nutrients
  • Journal of Nutrition

Laura E. Caulfield has collaborated extensively with a number of coauthors, including:

  • Laura E. Murray-Kolb
  • Benjamin McCormick
  • Margaret Kosek
  • Susan Gross
  • Tahmeed Ahmed

Recent publications highlight several areas of study and include:

  • Impact of early-onset persistent stunting on cognitive development at 5 years of age: Results from a multi-country cohort study (2020, PLoS ONE)
  • Early Life Experiences and Trajectories of Cognitive Development (2020, PEDIATRICS)
  • Maternal, Infant, and Child Health Outcomes Associated With the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (2022, Annals of Internal Medicine)
  • Engagement With and Acceptability of Digital Media Platforms for Use in Improving Health Behaviors Among Vulnerable Families: Systematic Review (2022, Journal of Medical Internet Research)
  • Dietary macronutrient intake and molecular-bacterial vaginosis: Role of fiber (2020, Clinical Nutrition)

Best Publications

  • Maternal and child undernutrition: global and regional exposures and health consequences

    Robert E. Black;Lindsay H. Allen;Zulfiqar Ahmed Bhutta;Laura E. Caulfield

  • Undernutrition as an underlying cause of child deaths associated with diarrhea pneumonia malaria and measles.

    Laura E Caulfield;Mercedes de Onis;Monika Blössner;Robert E Black

  • National and regional estimates of term and preterm babies born small for gestational age in 138 low-income and middle-income countries in 2010

    Anne C.C. Lee;Anne C.C. Lee;Joanne Katz;Hannah Blencowe;Simon Cousens

  • Exclusive breastfeeding reduces acute respiratory infection and diarrhea deaths among infants in Dhaka slums.

    Shams Arifeen;Robert E. Black;Gretchen Antelman;Abdullah Baqui

  • Associations of Suboptimal Growth with All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality in Children under Five Years: A Pooled Analysis of Ten Prospective Studies

    Ibironke Olofin;Christine M. McDonald;Majid Ezzati;Seth Flaxman

  • Potential contribution of maternal zinc supplementation during pregnancy to maternal and child survival.

    Laura E. Caulfield;Nelly Zavaleta;Anuraj H. Shankar;Mario Merialdi

  • Effectiveness of an educational intervention delivered through the health services to improve nutrition in young children: a cluster-randomised controlled trial

    Mary E Penny;Hilary M Creed-Kanashiro;Rebecca C Robert;M Rocio Narro

  • Use of quantitative molecular diagnostic methods to investigate the effect of enteropathogen infections on linear growth in children in low-resource settings: Longitudinal analysis of results from the MAL-ED cohort study

    Elizabeth T Rogawski;Jie Liu;James A Platts-Mills;Furqan Kabir

  • Neighbourhood differences in diet: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study.

    A V Diez-Roux;F J Nieto;L Caulfield;H A Tyroler

  • The associations of parity and maternal age with small-for-gestational-age, preterm, and neonatal and infant mortality: a meta-analysis

    Naoko Kozuki;Anne Cc Lee;Anne Cc Lee;Mariangela F Silveira;Ayesha Sania

  • Estimates of burden and consequences of infants born small for gestational age in low and middle income countries with INTERGROWTH-21 st standard: Analysis of CHERG datasets

    Anne C.C. Lee;Anne C.C. Lee;Naoko Kozuki;Naoko Kozuki;Simon Cousens;Gretchen A. Stevens

  • Use of quantitative molecular diagnostic methods to assess the aetiology, burden, and clinical characteristics of diarrhoea in children in low-resource settings: a reanalysis of the MAL-ED cohort study.

    James A Platts-Mills;Jie Liu;Elizabeth T Rogawski;Furqan Kabir

  • UNDERNUTRITION AS AN UNDERLYING CAUSE OF MALARIA MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY IN CHILDREN LESS THAN FIVE YEARS OLD

    Laura E. Caulfield;Stephanie A. Richard;Robert E. Black

  • Stunting, Wasting, and Micronutrient Deficiency Disorders

    Laura E. Caulfield;Stephanie A. Richard;Juan A. Rivera;Philip Musgrove

  • The effect of multiple anthropometric deficits on child mortality: meta-analysis of individual data in 10 prospective studies from developing countries

    Christine M McDonald;Ibironke Olofin;Seth Flaxman;Wafaie W Fawzi

  • Plant‐Based Diets Are Associated With a Lower Risk of Incident Cardiovascular Disease, Cardiovascular Disease Mortality, and All‐Cause Mortality in a General Population of Middle‐Aged Adults

    Hyunju Kim;Laura E. Caulfield;Vanessa Garcia-Larsen;Lyn M. Steffen

  • The MAL-ED Study: A Multinational and Multidisciplinary Approach to Understand the Relationship Between Enteric Pathogens, Malnutrition, Gut Physiology, Physical Growth, Cognitive Development, and Immune Responses in Infants and Children Up to 2 Years of Age in Resource-Poor Environments

    Angel Mendez Acosta;Cesar Banda Chavez;Julian Torres Flores

  • Carotenoids and the risk of developing lung cancer: a systematic review

    Lisa Gallicchio;Kristina Boyd;Genevieve Matanoski;Xuguang Grant Tao

  • Dietary intakes of women during pregnancy in low- and middle-income countries.

    Sun Eun Lee;Sameera A Talegawkar;Mario Merialdi;Laura E Caulfield

  • Undernutrition as an underlying cause of malaria morbidity and mortality.

    Caulfield Le;Richard Sa;Black Re

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert E Black
Robert E Black Johns Hopkins University
Zulfiqar A Bhutta
Zulfiqar A Bhutta Aga Khan University
Abdullah H. Baqui
Abdullah H. Baqui Johns Hopkins University
Janet A. DiPietro
Janet A. DiPietro Johns Hopkins University
Aldo A. M. Lima
Aldo A. M. Lima Universidade Federal do Ceará
Gagandeep Kang
Gagandeep Kang Christian Medical College & Hospital
Anthony J. Alberg
Anthony J. Alberg University of South Carolina
Richard L. Guerrant
Richard L. Guerrant University of Virginia
Maureen M. Black
Maureen M. Black University of Maryland, Baltimore
Mark A. Miller
Mark A. Miller University of California San Francisco Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in studying Medicine in the USA, there are several related online degrees and career pathways worth exploring. These can help you enter the healthcare field quickly or advance your career while balancing other commitments.

For those looking to start a nursing career without the stress of standardized testing, consider an lpn program no entrance exam. These programs provide a more accessible route to become a Licensed Practical Nurse, which is ideal for students seeking faster entry into nursing.

Management-oriented students might prefer healthcare administration programs. These accelerated degrees teach essential leadership, organizational, and operational skills needed for healthcare management roles, often with flexible online learning formats.

Registered nurses aiming to become nurse practitioners can explore rn to np bridge programs. These programs streamline your education, making it easier to transition to advanced clinical practice without restarting your academic journey.

Passionate about nutrition and wellness? An online nutritionist degree can open doors to careers in public health, dietetics, and wellness coaching, all while offering the flexibility of studying from anywhere.

No matter your interest, these online options can help you launch or advance a healthcare career with greater flexibility and accessibility.

Best Scientists Citing Laura E. Caulfield

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles