World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
36
Citations
5535
World Ranking
8997
National Ranking
270

Stephen C. Bowden publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen C. Bowden sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 175 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Stephen C. Bowden D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen C. Bowden sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stephen C. Bowden is affiliated with the University of Melbourne in Australia and has an extensive research portfolio primarily focused on medicine and psychology. Their work spans multiple subfields including psychiatry and mental health, cognitive neuroscience, experimental and cognitive psychology, neurology, and general health professions.

The scientist's recent research output includes papers published in well-known venues, covering topics such as alcohol-related brain disorders, epilepsy, immunotherapy outcomes in encephalitis, and cognitive ability assessments across cultures. Notable recent papers include:

  • "What is the optimum thiamine dose to treat or prevent Wernicke's encephalopathy or Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome? Results of a randomized controlled trial" (2022, Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research)
  • "Resting-state functional connectivity in the idiopathic generalized epilepsies: A systematic review and meta-analysis of EEG and MEG studies" (2021, Epilepsy & Behavior)
  • "Second-line immunotherapy and functional outcomes in autoimmune encephalitis: A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis" (2022, Epilepsia)
  • "The cross-cultural generalizability of cognitive ability measures: A systematic literature review." (2023, Intelligence)
  • "Cross-National Generalizability of WISC-V and CHC Broad Ability Constructs across France, Spain, and the US" (2023, Journal of Intelligence)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Bowden include Wendyl D'Souza, Mike W.-L. Cheung, Yi-En Quek, Yi Leng Fung, and Simon J. Vogrin. These collaborations have contributed to a breadth of research outputs.

Bowden has published multiple articles in recurring venues such as Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, Alzheimer's & Dementia, Epilepsia, and Early Intervention in Psychiatry, indicating focused research dissemination channels.

The main thematic areas of Bowden's work include dementia and cognitive impairment research, cognitive abilities and testing, functional brain connectivity studies, Alzheimer's disease research and treatments, educational and psychological assessments, cognitive functions and memory, and schizophrenia research and treatment. These topics reflect an interdisciplinary approach combining clinical and cognitive neuroscience insights.

Best Publications

  • Neurocognitive impairment associated with alcohol use disorders: implications for treatment.

    Marsha E. Bates;Stephen C. Bowden;Danielle Barry

  • MRI-negative PET-positive temporal lobe epilepsy: a distinct surgically remediable syndrome.

    R. P. Carne;T. J. O'Brien;T. J. O'Brien;C. J. Kilpatrick;C. J. Kilpatrick;L. R. MacGregor;L. R. MacGregor

  • Alzheimer's Disease and Driving: Prediction and Assessment of Driving Performance

    Gillian K. Fox;Stephen C. Bowden;Guy M. Bashford;Dennis S. Smith

  • On-road assessment of driving competence after brain impairment: Review of current practice and recommendations for a standardized examination

    Gillian K. Fox;Stephen C. Bowden;Dennis S. Smith

  • Thiamin treatment and working memory function of alcohol-dependent people: preliminary findings.

    Margaret L. Ambrose;Stephen C. Bowden;Greg Whelan

  • Cognitive functioning in idiopathic generalised epilepsies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    A. Loughman;S.C. Bowden;W. D'Souza

  • Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome not related to alcohol use: a systematic review

    Simon J Scalzo;Stephen C Bowden;Margaret L Ambrose;Greg Whelan

  • The Reliability and Internal Validity of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test

    Stephen C. Bowden;Kylie S. Fowler;Richard C. Bell;Gregory Whelan

  • Cognitive functioning in children with self‐limited epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

    Steven Wickens;Stephen C Bowden;Wendyl D'Souza

  • Separating cognitive impairment in neurologically asymptomatic alcoholism from Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome: is the neuropsychological distinction justified?

    Stephen C. Bowden

  • Working Memory Impairments in Alcohol‐Dependent Participants Without Clinical Amnesia

    Margaret L. Ambrose;Stephen C. Bowden;Greg Whelan

  • Differential neuropsychological test sensitivity to left temporal lobe epilepsy

    David W. Loring;Esther Strauss;Bruce P. Hermann;William B. Barr

  • Integrating the switching, inhibition, and updating model of executive function with the Cattell-Horn-Carroll model.

    Paul A. Jewsbury;Stephen C. Bowden;Milton E. Strauss

  • Neuropsychological and information processing performance and its relationship to white matter changes following moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: a preliminary study.

    J L Mathias;E D Bigler;N R Jones;S C Bowden

  • The Cattell–Horn–Carroll Model of Cognition for Clinical Assessment

    Paul A. Jewsbury;Stephen C. Bowden;Stephen C. Bowden;Kevin Duff

  • Neurotoxicity and neurocognitive impairments with alcohol and drug-use disorders: potential roles in addiction and recovery.

    Stephen C. Bowden;Fulton T. Crews;Marsha E. Bates;William Fals-Stewart

  • The influence of the therapeutic relationship in treatment for alcohol dependency.

    Alison Ritter;Stephen Bowden;Tania Murray;Paula Ross

  • Surgery for temporal lobe epilepsy associated with mesial temporal sclerosis in the older patient: a long-term follow-up.

    Michael Murphy;Paul D. Smith;Martin Wood;Stephen Bowden

  • Is performance on the Wechsler test of adult reading affected by traumatic brain injury

    Jane Mathias;Stephen C Bowden;E D D Bigler;Jeffrey Victor Rosenfeld

  • Which tests do neuropsychologists use

    Karen A. Sullivan;Stephen C. Bowden

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark J. Cook
Mark J. Cook University of Melbourne
Jane L. Mathias
Jane L. Mathias University of Adelaide
Marc L. Seal
Marc L. Seal University of Melbourne
Victor W. Henderson
Victor W. Henderson Stanford University
Erin D. Bigler
Erin D. Bigler University of Utah
David W. Loring
David W. Loring Emory University
Donald H. Saklofske
Donald H. Saklofske University of Western Ontario
Steven J. Collins
Steven J. Collins University of Melbourne
E. Arthur Shores
E. Arthur Shores Macquarie University
Lorraine Dennerstein
Lorraine Dennerstein University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in studying neuroscience, it's worth exploring related online degrees and career options. The flexibility of online education makes it easier to gain credentials that can supplement or enhance your neuroscience background.

For those aiming to build highly marketable skills quickly, browse certificates I can get online. These certificate programs cover a range of topics, from medical coding to data analysis—skills relevant to neuroscience research or health-related fields.

If you're looking for broader knowledge, many universities offer accessible online college courses in psychology, biology, and health sciences. These can serve as stepping stones to advanced neuroscience degrees or research positions.

Some neuroscience graduates consider careers in social work or behavioral analysis. Affordable, accredited options such as online MSW programs and online BCBA masters programs can open doors in clinical, therapy, and educational settings.

By combining neuroscience expertise with these online educational pathways, you can tailor your credentials to a wide variety of rewarding careers in science, healthcare, and human services.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen C. Bowden

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles