World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 36 8997 8311 270 256 175 5535

Stephen C. Bowden publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Stephen C. Bowden between 1984 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Stephen C. Bowden published across 42 years, from 1984 to 2025, averaging 4.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2023. 7 of the 198 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2023. 1984: 1 publication 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 2 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 7 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 8 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 7 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 6 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 19 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 1 publication
1984 2025

198 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Stephen C. Bowden: publications per year, 1984 to 2025
Year Publications
1984 1
1985 1
1986 0
1987 2
1988 2
1989 1
1990 2
1991 2
1992 5
1993 1
1994 2
1995 3
1996 2
1997 4
1998 4
1999 9
2000 1
2001 7
2002 3
2003 1
2004 8
2005 5
2006 5
2007 3
2008 9
2009 5
2010 4
2011 3
2012 1
2013 7
2014 8
2015 6
2016 9
2017 15
2018 1
2019 6
2020 5
2021 11
2022 8
2023 19
2024 6
2025 1
Total 198
Download as CSV

Stephen C. Bowden publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen C. Bowden sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 168–177 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 175 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383 175
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Stephen C. Bowden D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen C. Bowden sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435 36
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Stephen C. Bowden is affiliated with the University of Melbourne in Australia and has an extensive research portfolio primarily focused on medicine and psychology. Their work spans multiple subfields including psychiatry and mental health, cognitive neuroscience, experimental and cognitive psychology, neurology, and general health professions.

The scientist's recent research output includes papers published in well-known venues, covering topics such as alcohol-related brain disorders, epilepsy, immunotherapy outcomes in encephalitis, and cognitive ability assessments across cultures. Notable recent papers include:

  • "What is the optimum thiamine dose to treat or prevent Wernicke's encephalopathy or Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome? Results of a randomized controlled trial" (2022, Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research)
  • "Resting-state functional connectivity in the idiopathic generalized epilepsies: A systematic review and meta-analysis of EEG and MEG studies" (2021, Epilepsy & Behavior)
  • "Second-line immunotherapy and functional outcomes in autoimmune encephalitis: A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis" (2022, Epilepsia)
  • "The cross-cultural generalizability of cognitive ability measures: A systematic literature review." (2023, Intelligence)
  • "Cross-National Generalizability of WISC-V and CHC Broad Ability Constructs across France, Spain, and the US" (2023, Journal of Intelligence)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Bowden include Wendyl D'Souza, Mike W.-L. Cheung, Yi-En Quek, Yi Leng Fung, and Simon J. Vogrin. These collaborations have contributed to a breadth of research outputs.

Bowden has published multiple articles in recurring venues such as Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, Alzheimer's & Dementia, Epilepsia, and Early Intervention in Psychiatry, indicating focused research dissemination channels.

The main thematic areas of Bowden's work include dementia and cognitive impairment research, cognitive abilities and testing, functional brain connectivity studies, Alzheimer's disease research and treatments, educational and psychological assessments, cognitive functions and memory, and schizophrenia research and treatment. These topics reflect an interdisciplinary approach combining clinical and cognitive neuroscience insights.

Best Publications

  • Neurocognitive impairment associated with alcohol use disorders: implications for treatment.

    Marsha E. Bates;Stephen C. Bowden;Danielle Barry

  • MRI-negative PET-positive temporal lobe epilepsy: a distinct surgically remediable syndrome.

    R. P. Carne;T. J. O'Brien;T. J. O'Brien;C. J. Kilpatrick;C. J. Kilpatrick;L. R. MacGregor;L. R. MacGregor

  • Alzheimer's Disease and Driving: Prediction and Assessment of Driving Performance

    Gillian K. Fox;Stephen C. Bowden;Guy M. Bashford;Dennis S. Smith

  • On-road assessment of driving competence after brain impairment: Review of current practice and recommendations for a standardized examination

    Gillian K. Fox;Stephen C. Bowden;Dennis S. Smith

  • Thiamin treatment and working memory function of alcohol-dependent people: preliminary findings.

    Margaret L. Ambrose;Stephen C. Bowden;Greg Whelan

  • Cognitive functioning in idiopathic generalised epilepsies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    A. Loughman;S.C. Bowden;W. D'Souza

  • Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome not related to alcohol use: a systematic review

    Simon J Scalzo;Stephen C Bowden;Margaret L Ambrose;Greg Whelan

  • The Reliability and Internal Validity of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test

    Stephen C. Bowden;Kylie S. Fowler;Richard C. Bell;Gregory Whelan

  • Cognitive functioning in children with self‐limited epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

    Steven Wickens;Stephen C Bowden;Wendyl D'Souza

  • Separating cognitive impairment in neurologically asymptomatic alcoholism from Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome: is the neuropsychological distinction justified?

    Stephen C. Bowden

  • Working Memory Impairments in Alcohol‐Dependent Participants Without Clinical Amnesia

    Margaret L. Ambrose;Stephen C. Bowden;Greg Whelan

  • Differential neuropsychological test sensitivity to left temporal lobe epilepsy

    David W. Loring;Esther Strauss;Bruce P. Hermann;William B. Barr

  • Integrating the switching, inhibition, and updating model of executive function with the Cattell-Horn-Carroll model.

    Paul A. Jewsbury;Stephen C. Bowden;Milton E. Strauss

  • Neuropsychological and information processing performance and its relationship to white matter changes following moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: a preliminary study.

    J L Mathias;E D Bigler;N R Jones;S C Bowden

  • The Cattell–Horn–Carroll Model of Cognition for Clinical Assessment

    Paul A. Jewsbury;Stephen C. Bowden;Stephen C. Bowden;Kevin Duff

  • Neurotoxicity and neurocognitive impairments with alcohol and drug-use disorders: potential roles in addiction and recovery.

    Stephen C. Bowden;Fulton T. Crews;Marsha E. Bates;William Fals-Stewart

  • The influence of the therapeutic relationship in treatment for alcohol dependency.

    Alison Ritter;Stephen Bowden;Tania Murray;Paula Ross

  • Surgery for temporal lobe epilepsy associated with mesial temporal sclerosis in the older patient: a long-term follow-up.

    Michael Murphy;Paul D. Smith;Martin Wood;Stephen Bowden

  • Is performance on the Wechsler test of adult reading affected by traumatic brain injury

    Jane Mathias;Stephen C Bowden;E D D Bigler;Jeffrey Victor Rosenfeld

  • Which tests do neuropsychologists use

    Karen A. Sullivan;Stephen C. Bowden

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark J. Cook
Mark J. Cook University of Melbourne
Jane L. Mathias
Jane L. Mathias University of Adelaide
Marc L. Seal
Marc L. Seal University of Melbourne
Victor W. Henderson
Victor W. Henderson Stanford University
Erin D. Bigler
Erin D. Bigler University of Utah
David W. Loring
David W. Loring Emory University
Donald H. Saklofske
Donald H. Saklofske University of Western Ontario
Steven J. Collins
Steven J. Collins University of Melbourne
E. Arthur Shores
E. Arthur Shores Macquarie University
Lorraine Dennerstein
Lorraine Dennerstein University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in studying neuroscience, it's worth exploring related online degrees and career options. The flexibility of online education makes it easier to gain credentials that can supplement or enhance your neuroscience background.

For those aiming to build highly marketable skills quickly, browse certificates I can get online. These certificate programs cover a range of topics, from medical coding to data analysis—skills relevant to neuroscience research or health-related fields.

If you're looking for broader knowledge, many universities offer accessible online college courses in psychology, biology, and health sciences. These can serve as stepping stones to advanced neuroscience degrees or research positions.

Some neuroscience graduates consider careers in social work or behavioral analysis. Affordable, accredited options such as online MSW programs and online BCBA masters programs can open doors in clinical, therapy, and educational settings.

By combining neuroscience expertise with these online educational pathways, you can tailor your credentials to a wide variety of rewarding careers in science, healthcare, and human services.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen C. Bowden

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles