World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
54
Citations
15693
World Ranking
4477
National Ranking
2093

Fabian Monrose publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fabian Monrose sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 143 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Fabian Monrose D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fabian Monrose sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Fabian Monrose is affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on computer science and has produced numerous publications in this field.

The main areas of study covered in Monrose's work include:

  • Computer Science

Within this broad field, specific subfields addressed are:

  • Signal Processing
  • Information Systems
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Software
  • Materials Chemistry

Monrose's research explores various topics, notably:

  • Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
  • Security and Verification in Computing
  • User Authentication and Security Systems
  • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
  • Software Engineering Research
  • Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research
  • Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning

The scientist has contributed to different publication venues, with multiple papers appearing in:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Annual Computer Security Applications Conference
  • Digital Threats Research and Practice
  • Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Recent publications by Fabian Monrose include:

  • A Flexible Framework for Expediting Bug Finding by Leveraging Past (Mis-)Behavior to Discover New Bugs (2020), Annual Computer Security Applications Conference
  • Mitigating Data-only Attacks by Protecting Memory-resident Sensitive Data (2020), Digital Threats Research and Practice
  • Revisiting the Threat Space for Vision-Based Keystroke Inference Attacks (2020), Lecture Notes in Computer Science
  • Leveraging Disentangled Representations to Improve Vision-Based Keystroke Inference Attacks Under Low Data (2022), arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Towards Practical Fabrication Stage Attacks Using Interrupt-Resilient Hardware Trojans (2024), arXiv (Cornell University)

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Manos Antonakakis
  • Michalis Polychronakis
  • Jan-Michael Frahm
  • Sanjeev Das
  • Kedrian James

Best Publications

  • The design and analysis of graphical passwords

    Ian Jermyn;Alain Mayer;Fabian Monrose;Michael K. Reiter

  • Keystroke dynamics as a biometric for authentication

    Fabian Monrose;Aviel D. Rubin

  • A multifaceted approach to understanding the botnet phenomenon

    Moheeb Abu Rajab;Jay Zarfoss;Fabian Monrose;Andreas Terzis

  • Password hardening based on keystroke dynamics

    Fabian Monrose;Michael K. Reiter;Susanne Wetzel

  • Authentication via keystroke dynamics

    Fabian Monrose;Aviel Rubin

  • On user choice in graphical password schemes

    Darren Davis;Fabian Monrose;Michael K. Reiter

  • Just-In-Time Code Reuse: On the Effectiveness of Fine-Grained Address Space Layout Randomization

    K. Z. Snow;F. Monrose;L. Davi;A. Dmitrienko

  • All your iFRAMEs point to Us

    Niels Provos;Panayiotis Mavrommatis;Moheeb Abu Rajab;Fabian Monrose

  • Cryptographic key generation from voice

    F. Monrose;M.K. Reiter;Qi Li;S. Wetzel

  • Achieving efficient conjunctive keyword searches over encrypted data

    Lucas Ballard;Seny Kamara;Fabian Monrose

  • Password hardening based on keystroke dynamics

    Fabian Monrose;Michael K. Reiter;Susanne Wetzel

  • SoK: Security Evaluation of Home-Based IoT Deployments

    Omar Alrawi;Chaz Lever;Manos Antonakakis;Fabian Monrose

  • Stitching the gadgets: on the ineffectiveness of coarse-grained control-flow integrity protection

    Lucas Davi;Ahmad-Reza Sadeghi;Daniel Lehmann;Fabian Monrose

  • Traffic Morphing: An Efficient Defense Against Statistical Traffic Analysis.

    Charles V. Wright;Scott E. Coull;Fabian Monrose

  • My botnet is bigger than yours (maybe, better than yours): why size estimates remain challenging

    Moheeb Abu Rajab;Jay Zarfoss;Fabian Monrose;Andreas Terzis

  • On Inferring Application Protocol Behaviors in Encrypted Network Traffic

    Charles V. Wright;Fabian Monrose;Gerald M. Masson

  • Spot Me if You Can: Uncovering Spoken Phrases in Encrypted VoIP Conversations

    C.V. Wright;L. Ballard;S.E. Coull;F. Monrose

  • Language identification of encrypted VoIP traffic: Alejandra y Roberto or Alice and Bob?

    Charles V. Wright;Lucas Ballard;Fabian Monrose;Gerald M. Masson

  • The security of modern password expiration: an algorithmic framework and empirical analysis

    Yinqian Zhang;Fabian Monrose;Michael K. Reiter

  • Isomeron: Code Randomization Resilient to (Just-In-Time) Return-Oriented Programming

    Lucas Davi;Christopher Liebchen;Ahmad-Reza Sadeghi;Kevin Z. Snow

  • Just-In-Time Code Reuse: On the Effectiveness of Fine-Grained Address Space Layout Randomization (best student paper award)

    Kevin Z. Snow;Lucas Davi;Alexandra Dmitrienko;Christopher Liebchen

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael K. Reiter
Michael K. Reiter Duke University
Michalis Polychronakis
Michalis Polychronakis Stony Brook University
Jan-Michael Frahm
Jan-Michael Frahm University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Andreas Terzis
Andreas Terzis Google (United States)
Daniel P. Lopresti
Daniel P. Lopresti Lehigh University
Aviel D. Rubin
Aviel D. Rubin Johns Hopkins University
Ahmad-Reza Sadeghi
Ahmad-Reza Sadeghi Technical University of Darmstadt
Lucas Davi
Lucas Davi University of Duisburg-Essen
Patrick McDaniel
Patrick McDaniel University of Wisconsin–Madison

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a future in Computer Science opens the door to various online degree options in the USA, each offering flexibility and affordability. For those seeking a fast track, exploring an online associate degree can be a smart way to gain essential skills in just a few months. This is an excellent option for students looking to enter the workforce quickly or to lay the foundation for advanced studies.

For broader business applications or strategic tech management, many learners investigate an online business degree. Hybrid professionals with business and technical skills are highly attractive to employers in today’s market.

If cost is a concern, lots of students look for the cheapest online bachelor degree programs. These programs allow you to save on tuition without sacrificing quality, making a computer science education more accessible than ever.

Tech-focused learners might pursue engineering, but it’s important to evaluate an online engineering degree cost before enrolling. Understanding expenses and possible returns on investment helps you make informed choices as you build your computer science or technology career.

Best Scientists Citing Fabian Monrose

Trending Scientists