World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
68
Citations
18325
World Ranking
2470
National Ranking
1431

William B. Barr publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William B. Barr sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 203 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

William B. Barr D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William B. Barr sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2008 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

William B. Barr is affiliated with New York University in the United States and has an extensive publication record in the field of medicine, particularly focusing on epidemiology, psychiatry and mental health, cognitive neuroscience, neurology, and radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging.

Their research covers several main topics, including:

  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

William B. Barr has contributed to multiple papers notable for their publication venues and citations. Some recent papers include:

  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Consensus Diagnostic Criteria for Traumatic Encephalopathy Syndrome, 2021, published in Neurology
  • Developing methods to detect and diagnose chronic traumatic encephalopathy during life: rationale, design, and methodology for the DIAGNOSE CTE Research Project, 2021, published in Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
  • Cognitive phenotypes in temporal lobe epilepsy utilizing data- and clinically driven approaches: Moving toward a new taxonomy, 2020, published in Epilepsia
  • Development and application of the International Classification of Cognitive Disorders in Epilepsy (IC-CoDE): Initial results from a multi-center study of adults with temporal lobe epilepsy, 2022, published in Neuropsychology
  • Addressing neuropsychological diagnostics in adults with epilepsy: Introducing the International Classification of Cognitive Disorders in Epilepsy: The IC CODE Initiative, 2021, published in Epilepsia Open

Frequent co-authors working alongside William B. Barr include Michael L. Alosco, Laura J. Balcer, Jennifer V. Wethe, Yorghos Tripodis, and Charles Bernick, indicating collaborative efforts across multiple research projects.

The scientist's work has been regularly published in venues such as:

  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • The Clinical Neuropsychologist
  • UNC Libraries
  • Neurology
  • Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology

William B. Barr's professional achievements include being named a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2008.

Best Publications

  • Cumulative Effects Associated With Recurrent Concussion in Collegiate Football Players: The NCAA Concussion Study

    Kevin M. Guskiewicz;Michael McCrea;Michael McCrea;Stephen W. Marshall;Robert C. Cantu;Robert C. Cantu

  • Acute Effects and Recovery Time Following Concussion in Collegiate Football Players: The NCAA Concussion Study

    Michael McCrea;Kevin M. Guskiewicz;Stephen W. Marshall;William Barr

  • Assessment practices of clinical neuropsychologists in the United States and Canada: a survey of INS, NAN, and APA Division 40 members.

    Laura A. Rabin;William B. Barr;Leslie A. Burton

  • Incidence, clinical course, and predictors of prolonged recovery time following sport-related concussion in high school and college athletes.

    Michael McCrea;Kevin M. Guskiewicz;Christopher Randolph;William B. Barr

  • Standard regression-based methods for measuring recovery after sport-related concussion.

    Michael McCrea;William B. Barr;Kevin M Guskiewicz;Christopher Randolph

  • AN INTEGRATED REVIEW OF RECOVERY AFTER MILD TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY (MTBI): IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL MANAGEMENT

    Michael McCrea;Grant L Iverson;Thomas W McAllister;Thomas A Hammeke

  • Stability in Test-Usage Practices of Clinical Neuropsychologists in the United States and Canada Over a 10-Year Period: A Follow-Up Survey of INS and NAN Members.

    Laura A. Rabin;Emily Paolillo;William B. Barr

  • Sensitivity and specificity of standardized neurocognitive testing immediately following sports concussion

    William B. Barr;Michael McCREA

  • Is neuropsychological testing useful in the management of sport-related concussion?

    Christopher Randolph;Michael McCrea;William B Barr

  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Consensus Diagnostic Criteria for Traumatic Encephalopathy Syndrome

    Douglas I. Katz;Charles Bernick;David W. Dodick;Jesse Mez

  • Effects of a symptom-free waiting period on clinical outcome and risk of reinjury after sport-related concussion.

    Michael McCrea;Kevin M Guskiewicz;Christopher Randolph;William B. Barr

  • Changes in depression and anxiety after resective surgery for epilepsy

    O. Devinsky;W. B. Barr;B. G. Vickrey;A. T. Berg

  • Reliability and Validity of the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool–3 (SCAT3) in High School and Collegiate Athletes

    Esther Y. Chin;Lindsay D. Nelson;William B. Barr;Paul McCrory

  • Indications and expectations for neuropsychological assessment in routine epilepsy care: Report of the ILAE Neuropsychology Task Force, Diagnostic Methods Commission, 2013-2017.

    Sarah J. Wilson;Sallie Baxendale;William Barr;Sherifa Hamed

  • Acute effects and recovery after sport-related concussion: a neurocognitive and quantitative brain electrical activity study.

    Michael McCrea;Leslie Prichep;Matthew R. Powell;Robert Chabot

  • Concussion symptom inventory: an empirically derived scale for monitoring resolution of symptoms following sport-related concussion.

    Christopher Randolph;Scott R. Millis;William B. Barr;Michael McCrea;Michael McCrea

  • Cumulative Effects Associated With Recurrent Concussion in Collegiate Football Players

    Kevin M. Guskiewicz;Michael McCrea;Stephen W. Marshall;Robert C. Cantu

  • Temporal lobectomy in children: cognitive outcome.

    Michael Westerveld;Kimberlee J. Sass;Gordon J. Chelune;Bruce P. Hermann

  • Worsening of quality of life after epilepsy surgery: effect of seizures and memory decline.

    J. T. Langfitt;M. Westerveld;M. J. Hamberger;Thaddeus S Walczak

  • The use of figural reproduction tests as measures of nonverbal memory in epilepsy surgery candidates.

    William B. Barr;Gordon J. Chelune;Bruce P. Hermann;David W. Loring

  • Neuropsychological testing of high school athletes Preliminary norms and test-retest indices

    William B. Barr

  • Preinjury somatization symptoms contribute to clinical recovery after sport-related concussion.

    Lindsay D. Nelson;Sergey Tarima;Ashley A. LaRoche;Thomas A. Hammeke

Frequent Co-Authors

Orrin Devinsky
Orrin Devinsky New York University
Michael McCrea
Michael McCrea Medical College of Wisconsin
Thomas Thesen
Thomas Thesen New York University
Bruce P. Hermann
Bruce P. Hermann University of Wisconsin–Madison
Kevin M. Guskiewicz
Kevin M. Guskiewicz University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Ruben Kuzniecky
Ruben Kuzniecky Hofstra University
Chad Carlson
Chad Carlson Medical College of Wisconsin
Michael Westerveld
Michael Westerveld AdventHealth Orlando
David W. Loring
David W. Loring Emory University
Robert M. Bilder
Robert M. Bilder University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens doors to a variety of professional pathways, thanks to the diverse range of programs available in the USA. Today’s students can easily find flexible popular psychology degrees in USA, many of which offer both in-person and online study options.

For those interested in specific locations, there are top-ranked psychology degree programs in Reno and a wide range of popular psychology programs in Seattle. Additionally, students looking at education in the South can explore popular psychology degrees in University, MS.

Graduates from these programs can pursue careers such as counseling, human resources, research, and clinical psychology. Many degrees can also serve as stepping stones toward specialized graduate programs or roles in healthcare, education, and social services. The flexibility of online learning means it’s easier than ever to balance further education with personal and professional commitments.

Best Scientists Citing William B. Barr

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles