World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 64 2810 2663 354 339 197 12591

Philip Stanier publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Philip Stanier between 1983 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Philip Stanier published across 43 years, from 1983 to 2025, averaging 5.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2001. 1 of the 220 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1983 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2001. 1983: 2 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 4 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 20 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
1983 2025

220 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Philip Stanier: publications per year, 1983 to 2025
Year Publications
1983 2
1984 0
1985 1
1986 1
1987 4
1988 3
1989 1
1990 0
1991 3
1992 3
1993 2
1994 2
1995 2
1996 2
1997 5
1998 9
1999 9
2000 5
2001 20
2002 11
2003 8
2004 4
2005 6
2006 8
2007 7
2008 5
2009 8
2010 9
2011 6
2012 10
2013 7
2014 7
2015 9
2016 5
2017 6
2018 13
2019 8
2020 4
2021 4
2022 0
2023 0
2024 0
2025 1
Total 220
Download as CSV

Philip Stanier publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip Stanier sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 195–204 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 197 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173 197
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Philip Stanier D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip Stanier sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64–65 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172 64
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Gene
  • Mutation
  • Genetics

His primary areas of study are Genetics, Gene, Genomic imprinting, Neural tube and Mutation. His research in Candidate gene, Chromosome 7, Silver–Russell syndrome, Allele and Phenotype are components of Genetics. His Gene research incorporates elements of Computational biology and Cystic fibrosis.

Philip Stanier combines subjects such as Endocrinology, Internal medicine, Fetal membrane, Regulation of gene expression and Imprinting with his study of Genomic imprinting. His Craniorachischisis study, which is part of a larger body of work in Neural tube, is frequently linked to Neurulation, bridging the gap between disciplines. His Mutation study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Neural crest cell migration, TBX22 and Craniofacial.

His most cited work include:

  • Mutation of Celsr1 disrupts planar polarity of inner ear hair cells and causes severe neural tube defects in the mouse. (493 citations)
  • Neural tube defects: recent advances, unsolved questions, and controversies (344 citations)
  • Simple non-invasive method to obtain DNA for gene analysis. (285 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Genetics, Gene, Genomic imprinting, Mutation and Neural tube. His Genetics research focuses on Candidate gene, Locus, DNA methylation, Silver–Russell syndrome and Allele. His DNA methylation research incorporates themes from Regulation of gene expression, Methylation and Epigenetics.

His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Neural tube defect and Cell biology. His Genomic imprinting study incorporates themes from Gene duplication, Placenta and Imprinting. His work carried out in the field of Neural tube brings together such families of science as Spina bifida and Mutant.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Genetics (57.35%)
  • Gene (29.90%)
  • Genomic imprinting (21.08%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2012-2020)?

  • Genetics (57.35%)
  • Gene (29.90%)
  • Mutation (12.75%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Philip Stanier mostly deals with Genetics, Gene, Mutation, DNA methylation and Phenotype. Allele, Missense mutation, Neural tube, Autosomal recessive cerebellar ataxia and Candidate gene are the subjects of his Genetics studies. His Gene research includes elements of Microbiome, Ureaplasma, Mycoplasma and Cohort.

The study incorporates disciplines such as TBX22, Loss function and RNA splicing in addition to Mutation. The DNA methylation study combines topics in areas such as Chromosome, Methylation, Epigenetics and Genome. His studies in Phenotype integrate themes in fields like Cancer research, Zebrafish and Cell biology.

Between 2012 and 2020, his most popular works were:

  • Neural tube defects: recent advances, unsolved questions, and controversies (344 citations)
  • Multiple Congenital Melanocytic Nevi and Neurocutaneous Melanosis Are Caused by Postzygotic Mutations in Codon 61 of NRAS (178 citations)
  • Genetics of cleft lip and/or cleft palate: Association with other common anomalies (83 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Gene
  • Mutation
  • Genetics

His primary areas of investigation include Genetics, Mutation, Gene, Allele and DNA methylation. His Genetics research includes themes of Cerebellum and Cerebellar atrophy. His Mutation research is multidisciplinary, relying on both RNA splicing, Cutis laxa and Exon.

His work on Dwarfism as part of general Gene study is frequently linked to Phosphatidylserine, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of science. Philip Stanier has included themes like Gene mutation, SCRIB and Mutant, Genetic screen in his Allele study. His DNA methylation research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Methylation, Epigenetics and Heritability.

Best Publications

  • Mutation of Celsr1 disrupts planar polarity of inner ear hair cells and causes severe neural tube defects in the mouse.

    John A. Curtin;Elizabeth Quint;Vicky Tsipouri;Ruth M. Arkell

  • Genetics of cleft lip and palate: syndromic genes contribute to the incidence of non-syndromic clefts

    Philip Stanier;Gudrun E. Moore

  • Genetics of human neural tube defects

    Nicholas D.E. Greene;Philip Stanier;Andrew J. Copp

  • A candidate for the cystic fibrosis locus isolated by selection for methylation-free islands

    Xavier Estivill;Martin Farrall;Peter J. Scambler;Gillian M. Bell

  • Simple non-invasive method to obtain DNA for gene analysis.

    Nicholas Lench;Philip Stanier;Robert Williamson

  • Severe neural tube defects in the loop-tail mouse result from mutation of Lpp1, a novel gene involved in floor plate specification

    Jennifer N. Murdoch;Kit Doudney;Caroline Paternotte;Andrew J. Copp

  • Disruption of scribble (Scrb1) causes severe neural tube defects in the circletail mouse

    Jennifer N Murdoch;Deborah J Henderson;Kit Doudney;Carles Gaston-Massuet

  • The T-box transcription factor gene TBX22 is mutated in X-linked cleft palate and ankyloglossia.

    Claire Braybrook;Kit Doudney;Ana Carolina B. Marçano;Alfred Arnason

  • Multiple Congenital Melanocytic Nevi and Neurocutaneous Melanosis Are Caused by Postzygotic Mutations in Codon 61 of NRAS

    Veronica A Kinsler;Anna C Thomas;Miho Ishida;Neil W Bulstrode

  • Limited evolutionary conservation of imprinting in the human placenta

    D. Monk;P. Arnaud;S. Apostolidou;F. A. Hills

  • Mutations in lectin complement pathway genes COLEC11 and MASP1 cause 3MC syndrome

    Caroline Rooryck;Anna Diaz-Font;Daniel P S Osborn;Elyes Chabchoub

  • The genetic aetiology of Silver–Russell syndrome

    Sayeda Abu-Amero;David Monk;Jennifer Frost;Michael Preece

  • Mutations in the planar cell polarity genes CELSR1 and SCRIB are associated with the severe neural tube defect craniorachischisis

    Alexis Robinson;Sarah Escuin;Kit Doudney;Michel Vekemans

  • Conserved methylation imprints in the human and mouse GRB10 genes with divergent allelic expression suggests differential reading of the same mark

    Philippe Arnaud;David Monk;Megan Hitchins;Emma Gordon

  • TBX22 mutations are a frequent cause of cleft palate

    A C B Marçano;K Doudney;C Braybrook;R Squires

  • Elevated placental expression of the imprinted PHLDA2 gene is associated with low birth weight

    S. Apostolidou;S. Abu-Amero;K. O’Donoghue;J. Frost

  • Duplication of 7p11.2-p13, Including GRB10, in Silver-Russell Syndrome

    David Monk;David Monk;Emma L Wakeling;Emma L Wakeling;Virginia Proud;Megan Hitchins

  • Genetics of cleft lip and/or cleft palate: Association with other common anomalies

    Núria Setó-Salvia;Philip Stanier

  • The role and interaction of imprinted genes in human fetal growth

    Gudrun E. Moore;Miho Ishida;Charalambos Demetriou;Lara Al-Olabi

  • Maternal uniparental disomy 7 in Silver-Russell syndrome.

    M A Preece;S M Price;V Davies;L Clough

Frequent Co-Authors

Gudrun E. Moore
Gudrun E. Moore University College London
Andrew J. Copp
Andrew J. Copp University College London
Nicholas D. E. Greene
Nicholas D. E. Greene University College London
Neil J. Sebire
Neil J. Sebire Great Ormond Street Hospital
Eugene Healy
Eugene Healy University of Southampton
Nicholas J. Lench
Nicholas J. Lench University College London
John C. Whittaker
John C. Whittaker Grinnell College
Martin Farrall
Martin Farrall University of Oxford
Michael A. Patton
Michael A. Patton St George's, University of London
Gavin Kelsey
Gavin Kelsey Babraham Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring genetics opens doors to a variety of careers in healthcare and science. Many students combine genetics coursework with other in-demand certifications to boost employability and broaden their options. One popular path is to earn credentials in health IT. For example, understanding how much does it cost to become a medical billing and coding professional can help students evaluate affordable entry points into allied health.

Nursing remains a top choice for students interested in patient care. Reviewing the easiest nursing schools to get into may reveal flexible programs that complement a background in genetics or biology.

For those with an interest in leadership, enrolling in an online healthcare administration degree offers opportunities to transition into management and administrative roles. Prospective students can also search for health administration degrees online to find programs that fit their schedule and budget.

By exploring these diverse pathways, students can combine genetics with practical skills to build a dynamic and rewarding healthcare career.

Best Scientists Citing Philip Stanier

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles