World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Economics and Finance

D-Index
40
Citations
6254
World Ranking
2314
National Ranking
60

Tom Kompas publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tom Kompas sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 1 scientists 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42 publications 521+

This scientist: 230 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

Tom Kompas D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tom Kompas sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tom Kompas is affiliated with the University of Melbourne in Australia. Their research spans multiple disciplines within environmental and biological sciences, focusing predominantly on environmental science and agricultural and biological sciences.

Their work includes notable contributions in several subfields such as economics and econometrics, global and planetary change, ecology, modeling and simulation, and ecology, evolution, behavior, and systematics.

Kompas's research primarily addresses topics including COVID-19 epidemiological studies, forest insect ecology and management, economic and environmental valuation, COVID-19 pandemic impacts, animal disease management and epidemiology, climate change policy and economics, and data-driven disease surveillance.

The scientist has published extensively across a variety of venues. Frequent publication venues include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), SSRN Electronic Journal, Scientific Reports, and Ecological Applications.

Tom Kompas is a frequent collaborator with several researchers, including R. Quentin Grafton, Long Chu, Pham Van Ha, Hoa Thi Minh Nguyen, and James Camac.

Recent papers by Tom Kompas include:

  • Global impacts of heat and water stress on food production and severe food insecurity, 2024, Scientific Reports
  • Assessing the coastal protection services of natural mangrove forests and artificial rock revetments, 2022, Ecosystem Services
  • Pluralistic discounting recognizing different capital contributions: An example estimating the net present value of global ecosystem services, 2021, Ecological Economics
  • Integrated perspective on translating biophysical to economic impacts of climate change, 2021, Nature Climate Change
  • Robust estimates of the true (population) infection rate for COVID-19: a backcasting approach, 2020, Royal Society Open Science

Best Publications

  • Incentive-based approaches to sustainable fisheries

    R. Quentin Grafton;Ragnar Arnason;Trond Bjørndal;David Campbell

  • Economics of overexploitation revisited.

    R. Q. Grafton;T. Kompas;R. W. Hilborn

  • Determinants of residential water consumption: Evidence and analysis from a 10-country household survey

    R Quentin Grafton;Michael Ward;Hang To;Thomas Kompas

  • The Effects of Climate Change on GDP by Country and the Global Economic Gains From Complying With the Paris Climate Accord

    Tom Kompas;Tom Kompas;Van Ha Pham;Tuong Nhu Che

  • On implementing maximum economic yield in commercial fisheries

    C. M. Dichmont;S. Pascoe;T. Kompas;A. E. Punt

  • Realizing resilience for decision-making

    R. Quentin Grafton;Luc Doyen;Christophe Béné;Edoardo Borgomeo

  • Substitution between biofuels and fossil fuels: is there a green paradox?

    R Quentin Grafton;Thomas Kompas;Ngo Van Long

  • Technical efficiency effects of input controls: evidence from Australia's banana prawn fishery

    Thomas Kompas;Tuong Nhu Che;Quentin Grafton

  • On the Fixed-Effects Vector Decomposition

    Trevor Breusch;Michael B. Ward;Hoa Thi Minh Nguyen;Tom Kompas

  • Uncertainty and the active adaptive management of marine reserves

    R. Quentin Grafton;Tom Kompas;Tom Kompas

  • Beyond biological performance measures in management strategy evaluation: Bringing in economics and the effects of trawling on the benthos

    C.M. Dichmont;A. Deng;A.E. Punt;A.E. Punt;N. Ellis

  • Technology choice and efficiency on Australian dairy farms

    Thomas Kompas;Tuong Nhu Che

  • Institutions matter: The case of Vietnam

    Thi Bich Tran;R. Quentin Grafton;Tom Kompas;Tom Kompas

  • Economics for Fisheries Management

    R Quentin Grafton;James E Kirkley;Thomas Kompas;Dale Squires

  • Marine reserves with ecological uncertainty.

    R Quentin Grafton;Thomas Kompas;Thomas Kompas;David Lindenmayer

  • Optimal dynamic water allocation: Irrigation extractions and environmental tradeoffs in the Murray River, Australia

    R. Quentin Grafton;Hoang Long Chu;Michael Stewardson;Tom Kompas

  • Benchmarking for fisheries governance

    R Quentin Grafton;Thomas Kompas;Thomas Kompas;Richard McLoughlin;Nick Rayns

  • Positioning Fisheries in a Changing World

    R. Quentin Grafton;Ray Hilborn;Lori Ridgeway;Dale Squires

  • Firm Efficiency in a Transitional Economy: Evidence from Vietnam

    Thi Bich Tran;R. Quentin Grafton;Tom Kompas;Tom Kompas

  • Maximizing profits and conserving stocks in the Australian Northern Prawn Fishery

    Tom Kompas;Cathy M. Dichmont;André E. Punt;A. Deng

  • Productivity, Net Returns, and Efficiency: Land and Market Reform in Vietnamese Rice Production

    Tom Kompas;Tuong Nhu Che;Hoa Thi Minh Nguyen;Ha Quang Nguyen

  • Determinants of Residential Water Consumption: Evidence and Analysis from a Ten-Country Household Survey

    R. Quentin Grafton;Tom Kompas;Michael B. Ward;Hang To

Frequent Co-Authors

R. Quentin Grafton
R. Quentin Grafton Australian National University
Sean Pascoe
Sean Pascoe Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Ngo Van Long
Ngo Van Long McGill University
Ray Hilborn
Ray Hilborn University of Washington
André E. Punt
André E. Punt University of Washington
Dale Squires
Dale Squires University of California, San Diego
Adrian Kay
Adrian Kay Australian National University
Harry Campbell
Harry Campbell University of Edinburgh
Brendan A. Wintle
Brendan A. Wintle University of Melbourne
Mark A. Matthews
Mark A. Matthews University of California, Davis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education opens up diverse career options for students interested in Economics and Finance. Choosing a project management major is a valuable pathway for those who enjoy strategic planning and leading teams, complementing financial know-how with strong organizational skills.

If you're looking for a quicker entry into the workforce, consider fast online degrees that pay well, which can give you a head start in high-demand finance fields. For greater career advancement, the best accelerated MBA programs allow busy professionals to earn a prestigious qualification in less time and with flexible study options.

For students seeking highly practical and specific skills, the best bookkeeping certification online can pave the way to specialized roles in accounting and finance. With so many paths available, online learning makes it easier than ever to tailor your education for your ideal economics or finance career.

Best Scientists Citing Tom Kompas

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles