World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
57
Citations
13744
World Ranking
2683
National Ranking
203

Anthony D.M. Smith publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony D.M. Smith sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 116 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Anthony D.M. Smith D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony D.M. Smith sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Anthony D.M. Smith is affiliated with CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research in Australia. Their research spans several topics within environmental science, with particular focus on ecology, wildlife conservation, and marine management.

The main fields of study represented in Smith's work include:

  • Environmental Science

The subfields of study they contribute to are:

  • Ecology
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Small Animals
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Smith's research topics cover a diverse range of themes such as:

  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Coastal and Marine Management
  • Marine and Fisheries Research
  • Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
  • Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
  • Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies

The scientist has published in several academic venues, including:

  • Frontiers in Marine Science
  • Biodiversity and Conservation
  • Polar Biology
  • Integrative Organismal Biology

Among their recent papers are:

  • "Sectoral Futures Are Conditional on Choices of Global and National Scenarios - Australian Marine Examples," 2020, Frontiers in Marine Science
  • "Why didn't the caribou (Rangifer tarandus groenlandicus) cross the winter road? The effect of industrial traffic on the road-crossing decisions of caribou," 2023, Biodiversity and Conservation
  • "Behavioral and physiological stress responses of barren-ground caribou (Rangifer tarandus groenlandicus) to industrial ice roads," 2023, Polar Biology
  • "The Physiological and Biochemical Response of Ribbed Mussels to Rising Temperatures: Benefits of Salt Marsh Cordgrass," 2024, Integrative Organismal Biology

Frequent co-authors that have collaborated with Smith include:

  • Chris J. Johnson
  • Fabio Boschetti
  • Cathy Bulman
  • Alistair J. Hobday
  • Elizabeth A. Fulton

Best Publications

  • Human behaviour: the key source of uncertainty in fisheries management

    Elizabeth A Fulton;Anthony D M Smith;David C Smith;Ingrid E van Putten

  • Impacts of Fishing Low-Trophic Level Species on Marine Ecosystems

    Anthony D. M. Smith;Christopher J. Brown;Christopher J. Brown;Catherine M. Bulman;Elizabeth A. Fulton

  • Lessons in modelling and management of marine ecosystems: the Atlantis experience

    Elizabeth A Fulton;Jason S Link;Isaac C Kaplan;Marie Savina-Rolland

  • Design of operational management strategies for achieving fishery ecosystem objectives

    Keith J. Sainsbury;André E. Punt;Anthony D. M. Smith

  • Ecological risk assessment for the effects of fishing

    A.J. Hobday;A.D.M. Smith;I.C. Stobutzki;C. Bulman

  • Population dynamics of fox rabies in Europe

    Roy M. Anderson;Helen C. Jackson;Robert M. May;Anthony M. Smith

  • Reconsidering the Consequences of Selective Fisheries

    S.M. Garcia;J. Kolding;J. Kolding;J. Rice;Marie-Joelle Rochet

  • Implementing effective fisheries-management systems – management strategy evaluation and the Australian partnership approach

    A. D. M. Smith;K. J. Sainsbury;R. A. Stevens

  • Which ecological indicators can robustly detect effects of fishing

    Elizabeth A. Fulton;Anthony D.M. Smith;André E. Punt

  • Scientific tools to support the practical implementation of ecosystem-based fisheries management

    A. D. M. Smith;E. J. Fulton;A. J. Hobday;D. C. Smith

  • Ecosystem-based fisheries management requires a change to the selective fishing philosophy.

    Shijie Zhou;Anthony D. M. Smith;André E. Punt;Anthony J. Richardson

  • Effect of complexity on marine ecosystem models

    Elizabeth A. Fulton;Anthony D. M. Smith;Craig R. Johnson

  • Multispecies fisheries management and conservation: tactical applications using models of intermediate complexity

    Éva E Plagányi;André E Punt;André E Punt;Richard Hillary;Elisabetta B Morello

  • An integrated approach is needed for ecosystem based fisheries management: insights from ecosystem-level management strategy evaluation.

    Elizabeth A. Fulton;Anthony D. M. Smith;David C. Smith;Penelope Johnson

  • Biogeochemical marine ecosystem models II: the effect of physiological detail on model performance

    Elizabeth A. Fulton;John S. Parslow;Anthony D.M. Smith;Craig R. Johnson

  • Ecological Risk Assessment for the Effects of Fishing: Methodology. Report R04/1072 for the Australian Fisheries Management Authority

    A. J. Hobday;A. D. M. Smith;H. Webb;R. Daley

  • Eco-Label Conveys Reliable Information on Fish Stock Health to Seafood Consumers

    Nicolás L. Gutiérrez;Sarah R. Valencia;Trevor A. Branch;David J. Agnew

  • Experience in implementing harvest strategies in Australia's south-eastern fisheries

    Anthony D.M. Smith;David C. Smith;Geoffrey N. Tuck;Neil Klaer

  • Jellyfication of marine ecosystems as a likely consequence of overfishing small pelagic fishes: Lessons from the Benguela

    Jean-Paul Roux;Carl D. van der Lingen;Mark J. Gibbons;Nadine E. Moroff

  • Harvest strategy evaluation for the eastern stock of gemfish (Rexea solandri)

    A. E. Punt;A. D. M. Smith

  • Biogeochemical marine ecosystem models I: IGBEM—a model of marine bay ecosystems

    Elizabeth A Fulton;Anthony D.M Smith;Craig R Johnson

Frequent Co-Authors

André E. Punt
André E. Punt University of Washington
Elizabeth A. Fulton
Elizabeth A. Fulton Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Alistair J. Hobday
Alistair J. Hobday Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Timothy E. Essington
Timothy E. Essington University of Washington
Olivier Thébaud
Olivier Thébaud French Research Institute for Exploitation of the Sea
Olaf P. Jensen
Olaf P. Jensen University of Wisconsin–Madison
James T. Thorson
James T. Thorson National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Stewart Frusher
Stewart Frusher University of Tasmania
Trevor A. Branch
Trevor A. Branch University of Washington
Ana M. Parma
Ana M. Parma National Scientific and Technical Research Council

External Links

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution opens doors to interdisciplinary career pathways—many intersecting with healthcare and science. If you're interested in environmental health, conservation medicine, or research roles, you might consider expanding your education with online nursing or healthcare programs.

For those interested in shifting to nursing, it's useful to know how to become a np (nurse practitioner) in the shortest time, especially if you already hold a related degree. Accelerated programs are available for students aiming to quickly advance from RN to BSN degrees; check out these rn to bsn 6 months programs.

If you’re an associate degree nurse aspiring for more responsibility, asn to fnp programs (ADN to Family Nurse Practitioner bridge programs) allow for a direct path to advanced practice. Meanwhile, non-nursing graduates can start a new healthcare career via online msn programs for non nurses.

With flexible online education, combining a background in Ecology and Evolution with healthcare or research credentials is now more achievable than ever. These emerging pathways help graduates make a difference in both the environment and community health.

Best Scientists Citing Anthony D.M. Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles