World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
46
Citations
11975
World Ranking
4551
National Ranking
357

Stewart Frusher publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stewart Frusher sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 232 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Stewart Frusher D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stewart Frusher sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stewart Frusher is affiliated with the University of Tasmania in Australia, focusing on Environmental Science with a primary emphasis on marine and coastal research.

Their research spans multiple subfields including Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Global and Planetary Change, and Food Science. This multidisciplinary approach supports a comprehensive understanding of environmental systems, particularly those related to marine and fisheries contexts.

Key topics explored by Frusher include:

  • Marine and fisheries research
  • Coastal and Marine Management
  • Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
  • Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Ichthyology and Marine Biology
  • International Maritime Law Issues
  • Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability

The scientist has contributed to a selection of recent publications illustrating these themes. Notable papers include:

  • Ocean resource use: building the coastal blue economy, 2021, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
  • Food for all: designing sustainable and secure future seafood systems, 2021, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
  • Deep aspirations: towards a sustainable offshore Blue Economy, 2021, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
  • Responding to Climate Change: Participatory Evaluation of Adaptation Options for Key Marine Fisheries in Australia's South East, 2020, Frontiers in Marine Science
  • Integrating management of marine activities in Australia, 2023, Ocean & Coastal Management

Frusher frequently publishes in several academic venues, with multiple articles appearing in:

  • Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
  • Ecosystems
  • Environmental Biology of Fishes
  • Ocean & Coastal Management
  • Frontiers in Marine Science

Collaboration forms a significant aspect of their work. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Alistair J. Hobday
  • GT Pecl
  • Ingrid van Putten
  • Elizabeth A. Fulton
  • Sarah Jennings

Best Publications

  • Biodiversity redistribution under climate change: impacts on ecosystems and human well-being

    Gretta T. Pecl;Miguel B. Araújo;Miguel B. Araújo;Miguel B. Araújo;Johann D. Bell;Johann D. Bell;Julia Blanchard

  • Climate change cascades: Shifts in oceanography, species' ranges and subtidal marine community dynamics in eastern Tasmania

    Craig R. Johnson;Sam C. Banks;Neville S. Barrett;Fabienne Cazassus

  • Overfishing reduces resilience of kelp beds to climate-driven catastrophic phase shift.

    S. D. Ling;C. R. Johnson;S. D. Frusher;K. R. Ridgway

  • Statistical solutions for error and bias in global citizen science datasets

    Tomas J. Bird;Tomas J. Bird;Amanda E. Bates;Jonathan S. Lefcheck;Nicole A. Hill

  • Species traits and climate velocity explain geographic range shifts in an ocean‐warming hotspot

    Jennifer M. Sunday;Jennifer M. Sunday;Gretta T. Pecl;Stewart Frusher;Alistair J. Hobday

  • Keystone species and mangrove forest dynamics: the influence of burrowing by crabs on soil nutrient status and forest productivity

    Thomas J. Smith;Kevin G. Boto;Stewart D. Frusher;Raymond L. Giddins

  • Defining and observing stages of climate-mediated range shifts in marine systems

    Amanda E. Bates;Amanda E. Bates;Gretta T. Pecl;Stewart Frusher;Alistair J. Hobday

  • Managing consequences of climate-driven species redistribution requires integration of ecology, conservation and social science

    Timothy C. Bonebrake;Christopher J. Brown;Johann D. Bell;Johann D. Bell;Julia L. Blanchard

  • Reproductive potential of a marine ecosystem engineer at the edge of a newly expanded range

    Scott D. Ling;C. R. Johnson;S. Frusher;C. K. King

  • Rapid assessment of fisheries species sensitivity to climate change

    Gretta T. Pecl;Tim M. Ward;Zoë A. Doubleday;Steven Clarke

  • Non-lethal method to obtain stomach samples from a large marine predator and the use of DNA analysis to improve dietary information

    Adam Barnett;Adam Barnett;Kevin S. Redd;Stewart D. Frusher;John D. Stevens

  • Distribution and abundance of grapsid crabs (Grapsidae) in a mangrove estuary: effects of sediment characteristics, salinity tolerances, and osmoregulatory ability

    Stewart D. Frusher;Raymond L. Giddins;Thomas J. Smith

  • The short history of research in a marine climate change hotspot: from anecdote to adaptation in south-east Australia

    SD Frusher;AJ Hobday;SM Jennings;C Creighton

  • Estimating the size-transition matrix for Tasmanian rock lobster, Jasus edwardsii

    André E. Punt;Robert B. Kennedy;Stewart D. Frusher

  • Ocean resource use: building the coastal blue economy

    Narissa Bax;Camilla Novaglio;Camilla Novaglio;Kimberley H Maxwell;Koen Meyers

  • Rapid assessment of an ocean warming hotspot reveals ''high'' confidence in potential species' range extensions

    L.M. Robinson;D.C. Gledhill;N.A. Moltschaniwskyj;N.A. Moltschaniwskyj;A.J. Hobday

  • Ten tips for developing interdisciplinary socio-ecological researchers

    Rachel Kelly;Mary Mackay;Kirsty L. Nash;Christopher Cvitanovic;Christopher Cvitanovic

  • Communicating climate change: Climate change risk perceptions and rock lobster fishers, Tasmania

    Melissa Nursey-Bray;G.T. Pecl;S. Frusher;C. Gardner

  • Geographical variation in allozyme frequencies of populations of Penaeus monodon (Crustacea : Decapoda) in Australia

    J. A. H. Benzie;S. Frusher;E. Ballment

  • Measuring the vulnerability of marine social-ecological systems: A prerequisite for the identification of climate change adaptations

    Sarah J. Metcalf;Elizabeth I. van Putten;Stewart Frusher;Nadine A. Marshall

  • The east coast Tasmanian rock lobster fishery – vulnerability to climate change impacts and adaptation response options

    GT Pecl;SD Frusher;C Gardner;MG Haward

Frequent Co-Authors

Gretta T. Pecl
Gretta T. Pecl University of Tasmania
Alistair J. Hobday
Alistair J. Hobday Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Marcus Haward
Marcus Haward University of Tasmania
Elizabeth A. Fulton
Elizabeth A. Fulton Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Craig R. Johnson
Craig R. Johnson University of Tasmania
Jayson M. Semmens
Jayson M. Semmens University of Tasmania
Olivier Thébaud
Olivier Thébaud French Research Institute for Exploitation of the Sea
Graham J. Edgar
Graham J. Edgar University of Tasmania
Neville S. Barrett
Neville S. Barrett University of Tasmania
Éva E. Plagányi
Éva E. Plagányi Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your understanding of Ecology and Evolution can open the door to diverse career opportunities—not only in science, but also in fields that bridge healthcare, research, and education. For those interested in integrating biological sciences with a medical or healthcare career, online degree pathways make professional development more accessible than ever.

Nursing professionals, for instance, can explore flexible programs such as adn to np bridge options, which streamline the journey from an associate degree in nursing to becoming a nurse practitioner. If you don’t have a nursing background, online direct entry msn programs are tailored for non-nurses seeking advanced healthcare credentials.

For registered nurses considering bachelor’s completion, it’s important to choose the right institution. Comparing programs such as capella vs wgu rn to bsn can help you find a flexible learning format that suits your needs. Likewise, advancing from a BSN to master’s level can be more affordable than you think with reputable bsn to msn programs online.

These online options show how a foundation in biological sciences or healthcare can evolve into specialized, rewarding career pathways aligned with your interests in ecology, evolution, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Stewart Frusher

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles