World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
42
Citations
11438
World Ranking
6383
National Ranking
405

Janusz Bialek publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janusz Bialek sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 194 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Janusz Bialek D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janusz Bialek sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2011 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to transmission pricing and power system dynamics

Overview

Janusz Bialek is affiliated with Imperial College London in the United Kingdom and has a body of work primarily in the field of engineering with a focus on electrical and electronic engineering. Their research spans several subfields including control and systems engineering, safety, risk, reliability and quality, management science and operations research, and economics and econometrics.

The researcher's publications are concentrated around topics such as optimal power flow distribution, microgrid control and optimization, smart grid energy management, islanding detection in power systems, power system optimization and stability, power system reliability and maintenance, and building energy and comfort optimization.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Janusz Bialek include:

  • What does the GB power outage on 9 August 2019 tell us about the current state of decarbonised power systems? (2020, Energy Policy)
  • Review of Cooperative Game Theory applications in power system expansion planning (2021, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews)
  • Comparative analysis of services from soft open points using cost-benefit analysis (2023, Applied Energy)
  • Optimising Building-to-Building and Building-for-Grid Services Under Uncertainty: A Robust Rolling Horizon Approach (2021, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid)
  • Enabling Power System Transformation Globally: A System Operator Research Agenda for Bulk Power System Issues (2021, IEEE Power and Energy Magazine)

Frequent co-authors of Janusz Bialek include Matthew Deakin, Phil Taylor, Wenlong Ming, David Pozo, and Ilias Sarantakos.

They have published repeatedly in venues such as IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Electric Power Systems Research, arXiv, Energy Policy, and Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

Janusz Bialek was named an IEEE Fellow in 2011 for contributions to transmission pricing and power system dynamics.

Best Publications

  • Power system dynamics : stability and control

    Jan Machowski;Janusz W. Bialek;J. R. Bumby

  • Tracing the flow of electricity

    J. Bialek

  • Power system dynamics and stability

    Jan machowski;janusz w. bialek;james r. bumby

  • Topological generation and load distribution factors for supplement charge allocation in transmission open access

    J. Bialek

  • Smart Operation of Smart Grid: Risk-Limiting Dispatch

    P P Varaiya;F F Wu;J W Bialek

  • Hierarchical Spectral Clustering of Power Grids

    Rubén J. Sánchez-García;Max Fennelly;Seán Norris;Nick Wright

  • Approximate model of European interconnected system as a benchmark system to study effects of cross-border trades

    Qiong Zhou;J.W. Bialek

  • Allocation of transmission supplementary charge to real and reactive loads

    J. Bialek

  • Generation curtailment to manage voltage constraints in distribution networks

    Q. Zhou;Janusz Bialek

  • Benchmarking and Validation of Cascading Failure Analysis Tools

    Janusz Bialek;Emanuele Ciapessoni;Diego Cirio;Eduardo Cotilla-Sanchez

  • Renewable electric energy integration: Quantifying the value of design of markets for international transmission capacity

    Karsten Neuhoff;Julian Barquin;Janusz W. Bialek;Rodney Boyd

  • Proportional sharing assumption in tracing methodology

    J.W. Bialek;P.A. Kattuman

  • Optimal power flow as a tool for fault level-constrained network capacity analysis

    P.N. Vovos;G.P. Harrison;A.R. Wallace;J.W. Bialek

  • Opportunity Cost Bidding by Wind Generators in Forward Markets: Analytical Results

    C. J. Dent;J. W. Bialek;B. F. Hobbs

  • Supervisory Control of a Wind Farm

    Z. Lubosny;J.W. Bialek

  • Direct incorporation of fault level constraints in optimal power flow as a tool for network capacity analysis

    P.N. Vovos;J.W. Bialek

  • Decentralized stability-enhancing control of synchronous generator

    J. Machowski;S. Robak;J.W. Bialek;J.R. Bumby

  • Excitation control system for use with synchronous generators

    J. Machowski;J.W. Bialek;S. Robak;J.R. Bumby

  • What does the GB power outage on 9 August 2019 tell us about the current state of decarbonised power systems

    Janusz Bialek;Janusz Bialek

  • Why has it happened again? Comparison between the UCTE blackout in 2006 and the blackouts of 2003

    J.W. Bialek

  • Identification of source-sink connections in transmission networks

    J. Bialek

Frequent Co-Authors

Gareth Harrison
Gareth Harrison University of Edinburgh
Benjamin F. Hobbs
Benjamin F. Hobbs Johns Hopkins University
Andrew Keane
Andrew Keane University College Dublin
Luis F. Ochoa
Luis F. Ochoa University of Melbourne
Scott Backhaus
Scott Backhaus Los Alamos National Laboratory
Mark O'Malley
Mark O'Malley Imperial College London
Felix F. Wu
Felix F. Wu University of Hong Kong
Steven H. Low
Steven H. Low California Institute of Technology
Weerakorn Ongsakul
Weerakorn Ongsakul Asian Institute of Technology
Pravin Varaiya
Pravin Varaiya University of California, Berkeley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Janusz Bialek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles