World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Ireland
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
64
Citations
18186
World Ranking
2577
National Ranking
148

Bashar Nuseibeh publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bashar Nuseibeh sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 370 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Bashar Nuseibeh D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bashar Nuseibeh sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Ireland Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Computer Science in Ireland Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Ireland Leader Award
  • 2017 - Member of Academia Europaea

Overview

Bashar Nuseibeh is a researcher affiliated with the University of Limerick in Ireland. Their primary field of study is computer science, with a strong focus on information systems, sociology and political science, artificial intelligence, control and systems engineering, and human-computer interaction.

The scientist has contributed to several main research topics including privacy, security, and data protection; COVID-19 digital contact tracing; information and cyber security; advanced malware detection techniques; mobile health and mHealth applications; smart grid security and resilience; and risk and safety analysis.

Frequent publication venues for Bashar Nuseibeh include arXiv (Cornell University), ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -), Frontiers in Psychology, and the Journal of Responsible Technology.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Bashar Nuseibeh show engagement with public health, digital contact tracing, and security topics. These include:

  • "A national survey of attitudes to COVID-19 digital contact tracing in the Republic of Ireland," 2020, Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -)
  • "Best Practice Guidance for Digital Contact Tracing Apps: A Cross-disciplinary Review of the Literature," 2021, JMIR mhealth and uhealth
  • "Loneliness in older people and COVID-19: Applying the social identity approach to digital intervention design," 2022, Computers in Human Behavior Reports
  • "Sentiment analysis of user feedback on the HSE's Covid-19 contact tracing app," 2021, Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -)
  • "The Case for Adaptive Security Interventions," 2021, ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology

Among frequent co-authors, Bashar Nuseibeh has collaborated extensively with Mark Levine, Arosha K. Bandara, Blaine Price, Amel Bennaceur, and Liliana Pasquale.

Bashar Nuseibeh has been recognized as a Member of Academia Europaea since 2017.

Best Publications

  • Requirements engineering: a roadmap

    Bashar Nuseibeh;Steve Easterbrook

  • VIEWPOINTS: A FRAMEWORK FOR INTEGRATING MULTIPLE PERSPECTIVES IN SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT

    Anthony Finkelstein;Jeff Kramer;Bashar Nuseibeh;L. Finkelstein

  • A framework for expressing the relationships between multiple views in requirements specification

    B. Nuseibeh;J. Kramer;A. Finkelstein

  • Inconsistency handling in multiperspective specifications

    A.C.W. Finkelstein;D. Gabbay;A. Hunter;J. Kramer

  • Weaving together requirements and architectures

    B. Nuseibeh

  • Security Requirements Engineering: A Framework for Representation and Analysis

    C.B. Haley;R. Laney;J.D. Moffett;B. Nuseibeh

  • Software process modelling and technology

    Anthony Finkelsteiin;Jeff Kramer;Bashar Nuseibeh

  • Using ViewPoints for inconsistency management

    Steve M. Easterbrook;Bashar Nuseibeh

  • Managing inconsistent specifications: reasoning, analysis, and action

    Anthony Hunter;Bashar Nuseibeh

  • Leveraging inconsistency in software development

    B. Nuseibeh;S. Easterbrook;A. Russo

  • Making inconsistency respectable in software development

    Bashar Nuseibeh;Steve M. Easterbrook;Alessandra Russo

  • Hypermedia Support for Argumentation-Based Rationale

    Simon J. Buckingham Shum;Albert M. Selvin;Maarten Sierhuis;Jeff Conklin

  • Relating software requirements and architectures using problem frames

    J.G. Hall;M. Jackson;R.C. Laney;B. Nuseibeh

  • Characterizing Architecturally Significant Requirements

    Lianping Chen;Muhammad Ali Babar;B. Nuseibeh

  • A framework for security requirements engineering

    Charles B. Haley;Jonathan D. Moffett;Robin Laney;Bashar Nuseibeh

  • Identifying Nocuous Ambiguities in Natural Language Requirements

    Francis Chantree;Bashar Nuseibeh;Anne de Roeck;Alistair Willis

  • COORDINATING DISTRIBUTED VIEWPOINTS - THE ANATOMY OF A CONSISTENCY CHECK

    Steve Easterbrook;Anthony Finkelstein;Jeff Kramer;Bashar Nuseibeh

  • Analysing anaphoric ambiguity in natural language requirements

    Hui Yang;Anne de Roeck;Vincenzo Gervasi;Alistair Willis

  • Expressing the relationships between multiple views in requirements specification

    Bashar Nuseibeh;Jeff Kramer;Anthony Finkelsteiin

  • Hypermedia support for argumentation-based rationale: 15 years on from gIBIS and QOC

    Simon Buckingham Shum;A.M. Selvin;Maarten Sierhuis;Jeffrey Conklin

  • Inconsistency handling in multi-perspective specifications

    A Finkelstein;D Gabbay;A Hunter;J Kramer

Frequent Co-Authors

Yijun Yu
Yijun Yu The Open University
Jeff Kramer
Jeff Kramer Imperial College London
Anthony Finkelstein
Anthony Finkelstein University College London
Steve Easterbrook
Steve Easterbrook University of Toronto
Helen Sharp
Helen Sharp The Open University
Adam Joinson
Adam Joinson University of Bath
Yvonne Rogers
Yvonne Rogers University College London
Jan Jürjens
Jan Jürjens University of Koblenz and Landau
Carlo Ghezzi
Carlo Ghezzi Polytechnic University of Milan
Charith Perera
Charith Perera Cardiff University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education in computer science opens the door to many related fields. Many students consider programs like a physics degree online to deepen their problem-solving and analytical skills, which remain in high demand across the tech sector.

Data science offers a rapidly growing career path, driven by big data and analytics. For those looking to control tuition costs, an affordable data science degree can provide a smart entry into this lucrative market.

Engineering-minded students may pursue an online electrical engineering degree ranking to compare top programs. This can help focus your studies on cutting-edge skills vital for sectors like robotics, IoT, and hardware design.

Additionally, short-term certifications present great opportunities for career advancement. Consider reviewing certifications for jobs that are both accessible and highly valued by employers, whether as a career boost or a fast track into new tech roles.

Best Scientists Citing Bashar Nuseibeh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles