World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 51 5360 5208 2454 2369 140 10000

Daniel Wichs publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Daniel Wichs between 2008 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Daniel Wichs published across 18 years, from 2008 to 2025, averaging 8.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2016. 16 of the 146 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2008 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2016. 2008: 2 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 6 publications
2008 2025

146 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Daniel Wichs: publications per year, 2008 to 2025
Year Publications
2008 2
2009 7
2010 5
2011 7
2012 4
2013 13
2014 9
2015 7
2016 15
2017 8
2018 11
2019 13
2020 8
2021 9
2022 5
2023 7
2024 10
2025 6
Total 146
Download as CSV

Daniel Wichs publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Wichs sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 132–141 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 140 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555 140
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Daniel Wichs D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Wichs sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543 51
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

Overview

Daniel Wichs is affiliated with Northeastern University in the United States and has a research focus centered around Computer Science, with a specific emphasis on Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, and Computational Theory and Mathematics. Their work spans various subfields including Computer Networks and Communications and Information Systems.

The primary topics addressed in Daniel Wichs's research include Cryptography and Data Security, Cryptographic Implementations and Security, and Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data. They have also contributed to areas concerning Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption, Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs, Coding theory and cryptography, and Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques.

Among recent publications, Daniel Wichs has co-authored multiple papers such as:

  • "Use Your Brain! Arithmetic 3PC for Any Modulus with Active Security" (2020), published by Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)
  • "Is There an Oblivious RAM Lower Bound for Online Reads?" (2021), appearing in the Journal of Cryptology
  • "A system capable of verifiably and privately screening global DNA synthesis" (2024), available through arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Adaptively Secure MPC with Sublinear Communication Complexity" (2023), also published in the Journal of Cryptology
  • "Efficient Maliciously Secure Oblivious Exponentiations" (2024), featured in IACR Communications in Cryptology

Frequent collaborators in their research include Willy Quach, Vinod Vaikuntanathan, Yevgeniy Dodis, Ethan Mook, and Hoeteck Wee.

Daniel Wichs frequently publishes in venues such as Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl), the Journal of Cryptology, IACR Communications in Cryptology, arXiv (Cornell University), and OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) from La Trobe University.

In recognition of professional achievements, Daniel Wichs was named a Fellow of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation in 2018.

Best Publications

  • Separating succinct non-interactive arguments from all falsifiable assumptions

    Craig Gentry;Daniel Wichs

  • Multiparty computation with low communication, computation and interaction via threshold FHE

    Gilad Asharov;Abhishek Jain;Adriana López-Alt;Eran Tromer

  • Proofs of Retrievability via Hardness Amplification

    Yevgeniy Dodis;Salil Vadhan;Daniel Wichs

  • Two Round Multiparty Computation via Multi-key FHE

    Pratyay Mukherjee;Daniel Wichs

  • Leakage-Resilient Public-Key Cryptography in the Bounded-Retrieval Model.

    Joël Alwen;Yevgeniy Dodis;Daniel Wichs

  • Detection of algebraic manipulation with applications to robust secret sharing and fuzzy extractors

    Ronald Cramer;Yevgeniy Dodis;Serge Fehr;Carles Padró

  • Dynamic Proofs of Retrievability Via Oblivious RAM

    David Cash;Alptekin Küpçü;Daniel Wichs

  • Cryptography against Continuous Memory Attacks

    Yevgeniy Dodis;Kristiyan Haralambiev;Adriana Lopez-Alt;Daniel Wichs

  • Leveled Fully Homomorphic Signatures from Standard Lattices

    Sergey Gorbunov;Vinod Vaikuntanathan;Daniel Wichs

  • Non-Malleable Codes

    Stefan Dziembowski;Krzysztof Pietrzak;Daniel Wichs

  • Public-Key encryption in the bounded-retrieval model

    Joël Alwen;Yevgeniy Dodis;Moni Naor;Gil Segev

  • Optimizing ORAM and Using It Efficiently for Secure Computation

    Craig Gentry;Kenny A. Goldman;Shai Halevi;Charanjit Julta

  • Efficient Public-Key Cryptography in the Presence of Key Leakage.

    Yevgeniy Dodis;Kristiyan Haralambiev;Adriana López-Alt;Daniel Wichs

  • Learning with Rounding, Revisited

    Joël Alwen;Stephan Krenn;Krzysztof Pietrzak;Daniel Wichs

  • Onion ORAM: A Constant Bandwidth Blowup Oblivious RAM

    Srinivas Devadas;Marten van Dijk;Christopher W. Fletcher;Ling Ren

  • Fully Homomorphic Message Authenticators

    Rosario Gennaro;Daniel Wichs

  • Fiat-Shamir: from practice to theory

    Ran Canetti;Yilei Chen;Justin Holmgren;Alex Lombardi

  • Non-malleable extractors and symmetric key cryptography from weak secrets

    Yevgeniy Dodis;Daniel Wichs

  • Security analysis of pseudo-random number generators with input: /dev/random is not robust

    Yevgeniy Dodis;David Pointcheval;Sylvain Ruhault;Damien Vergniaud

  • Obfuscating Compute-and-Compare Programs under LWE

    Daniel Wichs;Giorgos Zirdelis

  • Multiparty Computation with Low Communication, Computation and Interaction via Threshold FHE.

    Gilad Asharov;Abhishek Jain;Daniel Wichs

Frequent Co-Authors

Yevgeniy Dodis
Yevgeniy Dodis New York University
Krzysztof Pietrzak
Krzysztof Pietrzak Institute of Science and Technology Austria
Craig Gentry
Craig Gentry TripleBlind
Shai Halevi
Shai Halevi Amazon (United States)
Hoeteck Wee
Hoeteck Wee École Normale Supérieure
Brent Waters
Brent Waters The University of Texas at Austin
Mariana Raykova
Mariana Raykova Google (United States)
Sanjam Garg
Sanjam Garg University of California, Berkeley
Stefan Dziembowski
Stefan Dziembowski University of Warsaw

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring your education options in Computer Science doesn’t stop at traditional bachelor’s degrees. Many students opt for advanced studies to deepen expertise or pivot careers. Pursuing an affordable graduate school program online can open doors to specialized IT roles and leadership positions—while helping to control tuition costs.

If you’re interested in leadership in tech-driven organizations, the best online doctorate in organizational leadership programs can offer the advanced skills needed to drive change and manage technology teams at the highest level.

For students who want to quickly build credentials and job-ready skills, earning an associate degree in 6 months online is an accessible pathway—ideal for those looking to enter the workforce sooner or gain foundational knowledge before transferring to a 4-year program.

Finally, educators and those aiming to advance within academia often pursue the cheapest online edd programs no gre, which offer specialized training in educational technology and policy—without the hurdle of standardized test requirements.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel Wichs

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles