What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Cryptography
- Computer security
- Computer network
Stefan Dziembowski mostly deals with Theoretical computer science, Cryptography, Computer security, Code word and Code.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Side channel attack and Secret sharing in addition to Theoretical computer science.
His Cryptographic implementations study in the realm of Cryptography interacts with subjects such as Leakage.
In general Computer security study, his work on Hash function and Adversary often relates to the realm of Digital currency, thereby connecting several areas of interest.
His Discrete mathematics study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Information leakage, Stream cipher and Bounded function.
His Trusted third party study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Construct and Secure multi-party computation.
His most cited work include:
- Leakage-Resilient Cryptography (466 citations)
- Secure Multiparty Computations on Bitcoin (251 citations)
- Efficient multiparty computations secure against an adaptive adversary (190 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Cryptography, Computer security, Adversary, Theoretical computer science and Discrete mathematics are his primary areas of study.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Random oracle and Bounded function.
The various areas that Stefan Dziembowski examines in his Computer security study include Computation and Protocol.
He has included themes like Cryptographic primitive, Information-theoretic security, Key and Malware in his Adversary study.
His studies examine the connections between Theoretical computer science and genetics, as well as such issues in Construct, with regards to Code and Code word.
His work in Discrete mathematics covers topics such as Function which are related to areas like Information leakage.
He most often published in these fields:
- Cryptography (50.50%)
- Computer security (43.56%)
- Adversary (32.67%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2015-2021)?
- Cryptography (50.50%)
- Computer security (43.56%)
- Cryptocurrency (12.87%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Stefan Dziembowski spends much of his time researching Cryptography, Computer security, Cryptocurrency, Blockchain and Construct.
His Cryptography research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Adversary, Theoretical computer science, Bounded function and Random oracle.
His work carried out in the field of Adversary brings together such families of science as Security analysis, Masking and Distributed computing.
His Theoretical computer science study incorporates themes from Tamper resistance, Binary logarithm, Code word, Parity-check matrix and Error detection and correction.
His research combines Protocol and Computer security.
His research in Construct intersects with topics in Trusted third party, Internet privacy and Trusted authority.
Between 2015 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- General State Channel Networks (77 citations)
- FairSwap: How To Fairly Exchange Digital Goods (73 citations)
- Perun: Virtual Payment Hubs over Cryptocurrencies (59 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Cryptography
- Computer security
- Computer network
His primary scientific interests are in Computer security, Cryptography, Cryptocurrency, Blockchain and Construct.
His Computer security study frequently involves adjacent topics like Internet privacy.
Stefan Dziembowski regularly ties together related areas like Random oracle in his Cryptography studies.
His studies deal with areas such as Computer network, Protocol, Smart contract and Provable security as well as Cryptocurrency.
His study connects Communication channel and Blockchain.
His study in Construct is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Trusted third party, Computation and Trusted authority.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
